Patrick Kyeremeh, Nixon Saba Adzifome, Emmanuel Amoah
{"title":"在职数学教师的差异化教学知识","authors":"Patrick Kyeremeh, Nixon Saba Adzifome, Emmanuel Amoah","doi":"10.23917/jramathedu.v7i2.16863","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"This study sought to investigate in-service mathematics teachers’ knowledge of differentiated instruction in junior high schools in Tano South Municipality of Ghana. The study adopted an explanatory sequential mixed method design. We employed a sample of 50 JHS mathematics teachers comprised 41 general in-service teachers and 9 special in-service teachersin the quantitative study through proportionate stratified sampling technique. In the qualitative phase, 6 JHS mathematics teachers comprising 4 general in-service teachers and 2 special in-service teachers were purposively selected and interviewed. In line with the design adopted, the quantitative data obtained through questionnaire was first collected and analysed. This was followed by the qualitative data obtained through semi-structured interviews. The quantitative data were analysed using both descriptive statistical tools (such as frequency counts, percentages, mean, standard deviation and average per item rating), and inferential statistical tool (independent samples t-test). Qualitative data used inductive content analysis. Among the findings, we found no statistically significant difference in the knowledge scores on differentiated instruction for general in-service teachers and special in-service teachers (t = -0.80, df = 48, p 0.05). We therefore recommend teacher education institutions to review their mathematics curriculum to reflect the use of differentiated instructional approaches among mathematics teachers.","PeriodicalId":360385,"journal":{"name":"JRAMathEdu (Journal of Research and Advances in Mathematics Education)","volume":"51 1","pages":"0"},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"2022-04-23","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":"{\"title\":\"In-service mathematics teachers’ knowledge of differentiated instruction\",\"authors\":\"Patrick Kyeremeh, Nixon Saba Adzifome, Emmanuel Amoah\",\"doi\":\"10.23917/jramathedu.v7i2.16863\",\"DOIUrl\":null,\"url\":null,\"abstract\":\"This study sought to investigate in-service mathematics teachers’ knowledge of differentiated instruction in junior high schools in Tano South Municipality of Ghana. The study adopted an explanatory sequential mixed method design. We employed a sample of 50 JHS mathematics teachers comprised 41 general in-service teachers and 9 special in-service teachersin the quantitative study through proportionate stratified sampling technique. In the qualitative phase, 6 JHS mathematics teachers comprising 4 general in-service teachers and 2 special in-service teachers were purposively selected and interviewed. In line with the design adopted, the quantitative data obtained through questionnaire was first collected and analysed. This was followed by the qualitative data obtained through semi-structured interviews. The quantitative data were analysed using both descriptive statistical tools (such as frequency counts, percentages, mean, standard deviation and average per item rating), and inferential statistical tool (independent samples t-test). Qualitative data used inductive content analysis. Among the findings, we found no statistically significant difference in the knowledge scores on differentiated instruction for general in-service teachers and special in-service teachers (t = -0.80, df = 48, p 0.05). We therefore recommend teacher education institutions to review their mathematics curriculum to reflect the use of differentiated instructional approaches among mathematics teachers.\",\"PeriodicalId\":360385,\"journal\":{\"name\":\"JRAMathEdu (Journal of Research and Advances in Mathematics Education)\",\"volume\":\"51 1\",\"pages\":\"0\"},\"PeriodicalIF\":0.0000,\"publicationDate\":\"2022-04-23\",\"publicationTypes\":\"Journal Article\",\"fieldsOfStudy\":null,\"isOpenAccess\":false,\"openAccessPdf\":\"\",\"citationCount\":\"0\",\"resultStr\":null,\"platform\":\"Semanticscholar\",\"paperid\":null,\"PeriodicalName\":\"JRAMathEdu (Journal of Research and Advances in Mathematics Education)\",\"FirstCategoryId\":\"1085\",\"ListUrlMain\":\"https://doi.org/10.23917/jramathedu.v7i2.16863\",\"RegionNum\":0,\"RegionCategory\":null,\"ArticlePicture\":[],\"TitleCN\":null,\"AbstractTextCN\":null,\"PMCID\":null,\"EPubDate\":\"\",\"PubModel\":\"\",\"JCR\":\"\",\"JCRName\":\"\",\"Score\":null,\"Total\":0}","platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"JRAMathEdu (Journal of Research and Advances in Mathematics Education)","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.23917/jramathedu.v7i2.16863","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"","JCRName":"","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0
摘要
本研究旨在调查加纳塔诺南市初中数学在职教师的差异化教学知识。本研究采用解释序贯混合法设计。采用比例分层抽样的方法,对50名初中数学教师进行定量研究,其中普通在职教师41名,特殊在职教师9名。在定性阶段,有目的地选取6名JHS数学教师进行访谈,其中一般在职教师4名,特殊在职教师2名。根据采用的设计,首先对通过问卷调查获得的定量数据进行收集和分析。其次是通过半结构化访谈获得的定性数据。定量数据分析使用描述性统计工具(如频率计数、百分比、平均值、标准差和平均每项评分)和推断性统计工具(独立样本t检验)。定性数据采用归纳内容分析。其中,普通在职教师与特殊在职教师的差异化教学知识得分差异无统计学意义(t = -0.80, df = 48, p 0.05)。因此,我们建议教师教育机构审查其数学课程,以反映数学教师使用差异化教学方法。
In-service mathematics teachers’ knowledge of differentiated instruction
This study sought to investigate in-service mathematics teachers’ knowledge of differentiated instruction in junior high schools in Tano South Municipality of Ghana. The study adopted an explanatory sequential mixed method design. We employed a sample of 50 JHS mathematics teachers comprised 41 general in-service teachers and 9 special in-service teachersin the quantitative study through proportionate stratified sampling technique. In the qualitative phase, 6 JHS mathematics teachers comprising 4 general in-service teachers and 2 special in-service teachers were purposively selected and interviewed. In line with the design adopted, the quantitative data obtained through questionnaire was first collected and analysed. This was followed by the qualitative data obtained through semi-structured interviews. The quantitative data were analysed using both descriptive statistical tools (such as frequency counts, percentages, mean, standard deviation and average per item rating), and inferential statistical tool (independent samples t-test). Qualitative data used inductive content analysis. Among the findings, we found no statistically significant difference in the knowledge scores on differentiated instruction for general in-service teachers and special in-service teachers (t = -0.80, df = 48, p 0.05). We therefore recommend teacher education institutions to review their mathematics curriculum to reflect the use of differentiated instructional approaches among mathematics teachers.