{"title":"1992- 1999年波兰不平等演变的注释:巴拉萨-萨缪尔森效应的分析注释","authors":"L. Podkaminer","doi":"10.1093/CJE/27.5.755","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"A Note on the Evolution of Inequality in Poland, 1992-99 (reprinted from Cambridge Journal of Economics, Vol. 27, No. 5, 2003, pp. 755-768, by permission of Cambridge Political Economy Society) Income inequality in Poland, after falling over the period 1993-96, rose significantly from 1997 onwards, as indicated by analyses of household budget surveys, national accounts data on functional income distribution and data on the dispersion of wages. Farmers and the unemployed were the main losers. While the overall position of wage-earners improved, wage inequality increased sharply in the second half of the 1990s. Employers and the self-employed fared quite well. This coincided with fiscal policy changes which substantially slowed down progression in income taxes. Over the period 1993-96, growth was high and balanced. Subsequently, growth slowed down, giving rise to serious fiscal and external deficits. Analytical Notes on the Balassa-Samuelson Effect (reprinted from Banca Nazionale del Lavoro Quarterly Review, No. 226, 2003, pp. 207-221, by permission of Banca Nazionale del Lavoro) On closer examination, it transpires that the intuition underlying the Balassa-Samuelson Effect (BSE) is wrong even in idealized models with highly restrictive features, the BSE need not obtain at all. A proper analysis of conventional models customarily believed to yield the BSE rigorously, in the form of an equation, indicates that changes in the relative prices of non-tradable goods may be totally unrelated to changes in relative productivity levels. In more realistic models (i.e. those tat do not postulate constant returns to scale or allow for intermediate inputs) there is even less room for determinate results supporting the BSE.","PeriodicalId":153726,"journal":{"name":"wiiw Research Reports","volume":"194 1","pages":"0"},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"2003-09-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"14","resultStr":"{\"title\":\"A Note on the Evolution of Inequality in Poland, 1992-99 Analytical Notes on the Balassa-Samuelson Effect\",\"authors\":\"L. Podkaminer\",\"doi\":\"10.1093/CJE/27.5.755\",\"DOIUrl\":null,\"url\":null,\"abstract\":\"A Note on the Evolution of Inequality in Poland, 1992-99 (reprinted from Cambridge Journal of Economics, Vol. 27, No. 5, 2003, pp. 755-768, by permission of Cambridge Political Economy Society) Income inequality in Poland, after falling over the period 1993-96, rose significantly from 1997 onwards, as indicated by analyses of household budget surveys, national accounts data on functional income distribution and data on the dispersion of wages. Farmers and the unemployed were the main losers. While the overall position of wage-earners improved, wage inequality increased sharply in the second half of the 1990s. Employers and the self-employed fared quite well. This coincided with fiscal policy changes which substantially slowed down progression in income taxes. Over the period 1993-96, growth was high and balanced. Subsequently, growth slowed down, giving rise to serious fiscal and external deficits. Analytical Notes on the Balassa-Samuelson Effect (reprinted from Banca Nazionale del Lavoro Quarterly Review, No. 226, 2003, pp. 207-221, by permission of Banca Nazionale del Lavoro) On closer examination, it transpires that the intuition underlying the Balassa-Samuelson Effect (BSE) is wrong even in idealized models with highly restrictive features, the BSE need not obtain at all. A proper analysis of conventional models customarily believed to yield the BSE rigorously, in the form of an equation, indicates that changes in the relative prices of non-tradable goods may be totally unrelated to changes in relative productivity levels. In more realistic models (i.e. those tat do not postulate constant returns to scale or allow for intermediate inputs) there is even less room for determinate results supporting the BSE.\",\"PeriodicalId\":153726,\"journal\":{\"name\":\"wiiw Research Reports\",\"volume\":\"194 1\",\"pages\":\"0\"},\"PeriodicalIF\":0.0000,\"publicationDate\":\"2003-09-01\",\"publicationTypes\":\"Journal Article\",\"fieldsOfStudy\":null,\"isOpenAccess\":false,\"openAccessPdf\":\"\",\"citationCount\":\"14\",\"resultStr\":null,\"platform\":\"Semanticscholar\",\"paperid\":null,\"PeriodicalName\":\"wiiw Research Reports\",\"FirstCategoryId\":\"1085\",\"ListUrlMain\":\"https://doi.org/10.1093/CJE/27.5.755\",\"RegionNum\":0,\"RegionCategory\":null,\"ArticlePicture\":[],\"TitleCN\":null,\"AbstractTextCN\":null,\"PMCID\":null,\"EPubDate\":\"\",\"PubModel\":\"\",\"JCR\":\"\",\"JCRName\":\"\",\"Score\":null,\"Total\":0}","platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"wiiw Research Reports","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1093/CJE/27.5.755","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"","JCRName":"","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 14
摘要
《关于1992-99年波兰不平等演变的注释》(经剑桥政治经济学会许可,转载自《剑桥经济学杂志》,第27卷,第5期,2003年,第755-768页)波兰的收入不平等在1993-96年期间下降后,从1997年起显著上升,这一点可以从家庭预算调查、国民账户数据和功能性收入分配数据以及工资分散数据的分析中看出。农民和失业者是主要的输家。虽然工资收入者的总体地位有所改善,但工资不平等在20世纪90年代后半期急剧加剧。雇主和个体经营者的表现相当不错。与此同时,财政政策的变化大大减缓了所得税的增长。1993- 1996年期间,增长高而平衡。随后,增长放缓,导致严重的财政和外部赤字。巴拉萨-萨缪尔森效应分析笔记(转载自Banca Nazionale del Lavoro季度评论,2003年第226期,第207-221页,经Banca Nazionale del Lavoro许可)仔细检查,发现即使在具有高度限制性特征的理想化模型中,巴拉萨-萨缪尔森效应(BSE)的直觉也是错误的,BSE根本不需要获得。对传统模型的适当分析表明,非贸易商品相对价格的变化可能与相对生产率水平的变化完全无关。传统模型通常以方程的形式被认为严格地产生了疯牛病。在更现实的模型中(即那些不假设按比例获得恒定回报或允许中间投入的模型),支持疯牛病的确定结果的空间甚至更小。
A Note on the Evolution of Inequality in Poland, 1992-99 Analytical Notes on the Balassa-Samuelson Effect
A Note on the Evolution of Inequality in Poland, 1992-99 (reprinted from Cambridge Journal of Economics, Vol. 27, No. 5, 2003, pp. 755-768, by permission of Cambridge Political Economy Society) Income inequality in Poland, after falling over the period 1993-96, rose significantly from 1997 onwards, as indicated by analyses of household budget surveys, national accounts data on functional income distribution and data on the dispersion of wages. Farmers and the unemployed were the main losers. While the overall position of wage-earners improved, wage inequality increased sharply in the second half of the 1990s. Employers and the self-employed fared quite well. This coincided with fiscal policy changes which substantially slowed down progression in income taxes. Over the period 1993-96, growth was high and balanced. Subsequently, growth slowed down, giving rise to serious fiscal and external deficits. Analytical Notes on the Balassa-Samuelson Effect (reprinted from Banca Nazionale del Lavoro Quarterly Review, No. 226, 2003, pp. 207-221, by permission of Banca Nazionale del Lavoro) On closer examination, it transpires that the intuition underlying the Balassa-Samuelson Effect (BSE) is wrong even in idealized models with highly restrictive features, the BSE need not obtain at all. A proper analysis of conventional models customarily believed to yield the BSE rigorously, in the form of an equation, indicates that changes in the relative prices of non-tradable goods may be totally unrelated to changes in relative productivity levels. In more realistic models (i.e. those tat do not postulate constant returns to scale or allow for intermediate inputs) there is even less room for determinate results supporting the BSE.