大学教室家具的人体测量学评价

Ahamed Altaboli, Hana Aliskandarani, Ala Alshaikhi, Hager Alahmar, Ruwida Muttardi
{"title":"大学教室家具的人体测量学评价","authors":"Ahamed Altaboli, Hana Aliskandarani, Ala Alshaikhi, Hager Alahmar, Ruwida Muttardi","doi":"10.54941/ahfe1003040","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"The objective of this study is to evaluate four types of university classroom furniture. The methods of evaluation included the individual comparisons equations method and the percentile values method; both are anthropometric methods. The third method is a questionnaire-based subjective evaluation method aiming at studying students’ satisfaction. The evaluated furniture dimensions were seat height, seat depth, seat width, backrest height, desk height and underneath desk height. The measured anthropometric dimensions were stature, hip breadth, elbow rest height, shoulder height, knee height, popliteal height and buttock-popliteal length. They were collected from 80 students (half males, aged between 20 to 39 years). The individual comparisons method showed relatively lower percentages of match between the furniture dimensions and student anthropometry. While, the percentile values method showed relatively high percentages of accommodation. Results of the questionnaire showed that the majority of students were satisfied with their preferred designs.","PeriodicalId":130337,"journal":{"name":"Physical Ergonomics and Human Factors","volume":"10 1","pages":"0"},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"1900-01-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":"{\"title\":\"Anthropometric Evaluation of University Classroom Furniture\",\"authors\":\"Ahamed Altaboli, Hana Aliskandarani, Ala Alshaikhi, Hager Alahmar, Ruwida Muttardi\",\"doi\":\"10.54941/ahfe1003040\",\"DOIUrl\":null,\"url\":null,\"abstract\":\"The objective of this study is to evaluate four types of university classroom furniture. The methods of evaluation included the individual comparisons equations method and the percentile values method; both are anthropometric methods. The third method is a questionnaire-based subjective evaluation method aiming at studying students’ satisfaction. The evaluated furniture dimensions were seat height, seat depth, seat width, backrest height, desk height and underneath desk height. The measured anthropometric dimensions were stature, hip breadth, elbow rest height, shoulder height, knee height, popliteal height and buttock-popliteal length. They were collected from 80 students (half males, aged between 20 to 39 years). The individual comparisons method showed relatively lower percentages of match between the furniture dimensions and student anthropometry. While, the percentile values method showed relatively high percentages of accommodation. Results of the questionnaire showed that the majority of students were satisfied with their preferred designs.\",\"PeriodicalId\":130337,\"journal\":{\"name\":\"Physical Ergonomics and Human Factors\",\"volume\":\"10 1\",\"pages\":\"0\"},\"PeriodicalIF\":0.0000,\"publicationDate\":\"1900-01-01\",\"publicationTypes\":\"Journal Article\",\"fieldsOfStudy\":null,\"isOpenAccess\":false,\"openAccessPdf\":\"\",\"citationCount\":\"0\",\"resultStr\":null,\"platform\":\"Semanticscholar\",\"paperid\":null,\"PeriodicalName\":\"Physical Ergonomics and Human Factors\",\"FirstCategoryId\":\"1085\",\"ListUrlMain\":\"https://doi.org/10.54941/ahfe1003040\",\"RegionNum\":0,\"RegionCategory\":null,\"ArticlePicture\":[],\"TitleCN\":null,\"AbstractTextCN\":null,\"PMCID\":null,\"EPubDate\":\"\",\"PubModel\":\"\",\"JCR\":\"\",\"JCRName\":\"\",\"Score\":null,\"Total\":0}","platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Physical Ergonomics and Human Factors","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.54941/ahfe1003040","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"","JCRName":"","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

摘要

本研究的目的是评估四种类型的大学教室家具。评价方法包括个体比较方程法和百分位数法;两者都是人体测量学方法。第三种方法是基于问卷的主观评价法,旨在研究学生的满意度。评估的家具尺寸包括座椅高度、座椅深度、座椅宽度、靠背高度、办公桌高度和桌下高度。测量的人体测量指标为身高、臀宽、肘托高度、肩高、膝高、腘窝高度和臀-腘窝长度。他们是从80名学生中收集的(一半是男性,年龄在20到39岁之间)。个体比较法显示,家具尺寸与学生人体测量之间的匹配百分比相对较低。而百分位值法显示出相对较高的通融率。问卷调查结果显示,大多数学生对自己的首选设计感到满意。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
Anthropometric Evaluation of University Classroom Furniture
The objective of this study is to evaluate four types of university classroom furniture. The methods of evaluation included the individual comparisons equations method and the percentile values method; both are anthropometric methods. The third method is a questionnaire-based subjective evaluation method aiming at studying students’ satisfaction. The evaluated furniture dimensions were seat height, seat depth, seat width, backrest height, desk height and underneath desk height. The measured anthropometric dimensions were stature, hip breadth, elbow rest height, shoulder height, knee height, popliteal height and buttock-popliteal length. They were collected from 80 students (half males, aged between 20 to 39 years). The individual comparisons method showed relatively lower percentages of match between the furniture dimensions and student anthropometry. While, the percentile values method showed relatively high percentages of accommodation. Results of the questionnaire showed that the majority of students were satisfied with their preferred designs.
求助全文
通过发布文献求助,成功后即可免费获取论文全文。 去求助
来源期刊
自引率
0.00%
发文量
0
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:604180095
Book学术官方微信