从FMTV到WATERS: ECRTS首次验证挑战的经验教训(特邀论文)

S. Altmeyer, É. André, Silvano Dal-Zilio, Loïc Fejoz, M. G. Harbour, S. Graf, J. Javier Gutiérrez, R. Henia, Didier Le Botlan, G. Lipari, J. L. M. Pasaje, N. Navet, Sophie Quinton, J. Rivas, Youcheng Sun
{"title":"从FMTV到WATERS: ECRTS首次验证挑战的经验教训(特邀论文)","authors":"S. Altmeyer, É. André, Silvano Dal-Zilio, Loïc Fejoz, M. G. Harbour, S. Graf, J. Javier Gutiérrez, R. Henia, Didier Le Botlan, G. Lipari, J. L. M. Pasaje, N. Navet, Sophie Quinton, J. Rivas, Youcheng Sun","doi":"10.4230/LIPIcs.ECRTS.2023.19","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"We present here the main features and lessons learned from the first edition of what has now become the ECRTS industrial challenge, together with the final description of the challenge and a comparative overview of the proposed solutions. This verification challenge, proposed by Thales, was first discussed in 2014 as part of a dedicated workshop (FMTV, a satellite event of the FM 2014 conference), and solutions were discussed for the first time at the WATERS 2015 workshop. The use case for the verification challenge is an aerial video tracking system. A specificity of this system lies in the fact that periods are constant but known with a limited precision only. The first part of the challenge focuses on the video frame processing system. It consists in computing maximum values of the end-to-end latency of the frames sent by the camera to the display, for two different buffer sizes, and then the minimum duration between two consecutive frame losses. The second challenge is about computing end-to-end latencies on the tracking and camera control for two different values of jitter. Solutions based on five different tools – Fiacre/Tina, CPAL (simulation and analysis), IMITATOR , Uppaal and MAST – were submitted for discussion at WATERS 2015. While none of these solutions provided a full answer to the challenge, a combination of several of them did allow to draw some conclusions.","PeriodicalId":191379,"journal":{"name":"Euromicro Conference on Real-Time Systems","volume":"69 1","pages":"0"},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"1900-01-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":"{\"title\":\"From FMTV to WATERS: Lessons Learned from the First Verification Challenge at ECRTS (Invited Paper)\",\"authors\":\"S. Altmeyer, É. André, Silvano Dal-Zilio, Loïc Fejoz, M. G. Harbour, S. Graf, J. Javier Gutiérrez, R. Henia, Didier Le Botlan, G. Lipari, J. L. M. Pasaje, N. Navet, Sophie Quinton, J. Rivas, Youcheng Sun\",\"doi\":\"10.4230/LIPIcs.ECRTS.2023.19\",\"DOIUrl\":null,\"url\":null,\"abstract\":\"We present here the main features and lessons learned from the first edition of what has now become the ECRTS industrial challenge, together with the final description of the challenge and a comparative overview of the proposed solutions. This verification challenge, proposed by Thales, was first discussed in 2014 as part of a dedicated workshop (FMTV, a satellite event of the FM 2014 conference), and solutions were discussed for the first time at the WATERS 2015 workshop. The use case for the verification challenge is an aerial video tracking system. A specificity of this system lies in the fact that periods are constant but known with a limited precision only. The first part of the challenge focuses on the video frame processing system. It consists in computing maximum values of the end-to-end latency of the frames sent by the camera to the display, for two different buffer sizes, and then the minimum duration between two consecutive frame losses. The second challenge is about computing end-to-end latencies on the tracking and camera control for two different values of jitter. Solutions based on five different tools – Fiacre/Tina, CPAL (simulation and analysis), IMITATOR , Uppaal and MAST – were submitted for discussion at WATERS 2015. While none of these solutions provided a full answer to the challenge, a combination of several of them did allow to draw some conclusions.\",\"PeriodicalId\":191379,\"journal\":{\"name\":\"Euromicro Conference on Real-Time Systems\",\"volume\":\"69 1\",\"pages\":\"0\"},\"PeriodicalIF\":0.0000,\"publicationDate\":\"1900-01-01\",\"publicationTypes\":\"Journal Article\",\"fieldsOfStudy\":null,\"isOpenAccess\":false,\"openAccessPdf\":\"\",\"citationCount\":\"0\",\"resultStr\":null,\"platform\":\"Semanticscholar\",\"paperid\":null,\"PeriodicalName\":\"Euromicro Conference on Real-Time Systems\",\"FirstCategoryId\":\"1085\",\"ListUrlMain\":\"https://doi.org/10.4230/LIPIcs.ECRTS.2023.19\",\"RegionNum\":0,\"RegionCategory\":null,\"ArticlePicture\":[],\"TitleCN\":null,\"AbstractTextCN\":null,\"PMCID\":null,\"EPubDate\":\"\",\"PubModel\":\"\",\"JCR\":\"\",\"JCRName\":\"\",\"Score\":null,\"Total\":0}","platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Euromicro Conference on Real-Time Systems","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.4230/LIPIcs.ECRTS.2023.19","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"","JCRName":"","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

摘要

在这里,我们将介绍第一版的主要特点和从现在已成为ECRTS工业挑战的经验教训,以及对挑战的最终描述和所建议解决方案的比较概述。这一验证挑战由泰雷兹公司提出,并于2014年作为专门研讨会(FMTV, 2014年FM会议的卫星活动)的一部分进行了首次讨论,并在2015年WATERS研讨会上首次讨论了解决方案。验证挑战的用例是空中视频跟踪系统。这个系统的一个特点在于周期是恒定的,但只有有限的精度。挑战的第一部分侧重于视频帧处理系统。它包括计算相机发送到显示器的帧的端到端延迟的最大值,对于两个不同的缓冲区大小,然后是两个连续帧丢失之间的最小持续时间。第二个挑战是计算两种不同抖动值的跟踪和相机控制的端到端延迟。基于Fiacre/Tina、CPAL(仿真与分析)、IMITATOR、Uppaal和MAST这五种不同工具的解决方案在2015年WATERS大会上提交讨论。虽然这些解决方案都不能完全解决这一挑战,但将其中几个解决方案结合起来确实可以得出一些结论。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
From FMTV to WATERS: Lessons Learned from the First Verification Challenge at ECRTS (Invited Paper)
We present here the main features and lessons learned from the first edition of what has now become the ECRTS industrial challenge, together with the final description of the challenge and a comparative overview of the proposed solutions. This verification challenge, proposed by Thales, was first discussed in 2014 as part of a dedicated workshop (FMTV, a satellite event of the FM 2014 conference), and solutions were discussed for the first time at the WATERS 2015 workshop. The use case for the verification challenge is an aerial video tracking system. A specificity of this system lies in the fact that periods are constant but known with a limited precision only. The first part of the challenge focuses on the video frame processing system. It consists in computing maximum values of the end-to-end latency of the frames sent by the camera to the display, for two different buffer sizes, and then the minimum duration between two consecutive frame losses. The second challenge is about computing end-to-end latencies on the tracking and camera control for two different values of jitter. Solutions based on five different tools – Fiacre/Tina, CPAL (simulation and analysis), IMITATOR , Uppaal and MAST – were submitted for discussion at WATERS 2015. While none of these solutions provided a full answer to the challenge, a combination of several of them did allow to draw some conclusions.
求助全文
通过发布文献求助,成功后即可免费获取论文全文。 去求助
来源期刊
自引率
0.00%
发文量
0
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术官方微信