{"title":"[透析中测定尿酸清除率的浓度测量误差引起的计算误差:模拟研究]。","authors":"B Jäger, K E Biebler, G Kraatz","doi":"","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><p>Three calculation methods to estimation of the total clearance of dialysis patients are evaluated. The basis of calculation are concentration values of urea in blood versus dialysate. The variation coefficient of the measurement errors is 5 percent. The error formation in three estimation formulas is examined. The formula [formula: see text] is most suitable, if as evaluation criteria the variation coefficient of the estimation error are used. The parameters like dialysate flow, blood flow, ultrafiltration rate and dialysate volume are of relative value.</p>","PeriodicalId":76863,"journal":{"name":"Zeitschrift fur Urologie und Nephrologie","volume":"83 11","pages":"603-8"},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"1990-11-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":"{\"title\":\"[A concentration measuring error-induced calculation error in determining uric acid clearance in dialysis: a simulation study].\",\"authors\":\"B Jäger, K E Biebler, G Kraatz\",\"doi\":\"\",\"DOIUrl\":null,\"url\":null,\"abstract\":\"<p><p>Three calculation methods to estimation of the total clearance of dialysis patients are evaluated. The basis of calculation are concentration values of urea in blood versus dialysate. The variation coefficient of the measurement errors is 5 percent. The error formation in three estimation formulas is examined. The formula [formula: see text] is most suitable, if as evaluation criteria the variation coefficient of the estimation error are used. The parameters like dialysate flow, blood flow, ultrafiltration rate and dialysate volume are of relative value.</p>\",\"PeriodicalId\":76863,\"journal\":{\"name\":\"Zeitschrift fur Urologie und Nephrologie\",\"volume\":\"83 11\",\"pages\":\"603-8\"},\"PeriodicalIF\":0.0000,\"publicationDate\":\"1990-11-01\",\"publicationTypes\":\"Journal Article\",\"fieldsOfStudy\":null,\"isOpenAccess\":false,\"openAccessPdf\":\"\",\"citationCount\":\"0\",\"resultStr\":null,\"platform\":\"Semanticscholar\",\"paperid\":null,\"PeriodicalName\":\"Zeitschrift fur Urologie und Nephrologie\",\"FirstCategoryId\":\"1085\",\"ListUrlMain\":\"\",\"RegionNum\":0,\"RegionCategory\":null,\"ArticlePicture\":[],\"TitleCN\":null,\"AbstractTextCN\":null,\"PMCID\":null,\"EPubDate\":\"\",\"PubModel\":\"\",\"JCR\":\"\",\"JCRName\":\"\",\"Score\":null,\"Total\":0}","platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Zeitschrift fur Urologie und Nephrologie","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"","JCRName":"","Score":null,"Total":0}
[A concentration measuring error-induced calculation error in determining uric acid clearance in dialysis: a simulation study].
Three calculation methods to estimation of the total clearance of dialysis patients are evaluated. The basis of calculation are concentration values of urea in blood versus dialysate. The variation coefficient of the measurement errors is 5 percent. The error formation in three estimation formulas is examined. The formula [formula: see text] is most suitable, if as evaluation criteria the variation coefficient of the estimation error are used. The parameters like dialysate flow, blood flow, ultrafiltration rate and dialysate volume are of relative value.
求助内容：
应助结果提醒方式：
京公网安备 11010802042870号
