尼日尔三角洲高产油田充能阴影区钻探:从x井获得的经验

Ogunlana Ayodeji, Akingbade Kolawole, Falade Oladipo, Obilaja Olusegun, Chima Chikezie, H. Farran, Jenakumo Timipere, Orakwue Anita
{"title":"尼日尔三角洲高产油田充能阴影区钻探:从x井获得的经验","authors":"Ogunlana Ayodeji, Akingbade Kolawole, Falade Oladipo, Obilaja Olusegun, Chima Chikezie, H. Farran, Jenakumo Timipere, Orakwue Anita","doi":"10.2118/217127-ms","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"\n Three decades on, a brownfield still springs surprises in the Deepwater Niger Delta. An Exploration well, Well-X was recently drilled targeting an amplitude-supported opportunity within a prolific geological interval in a Deepwater field. The well discovered excellent reservoir of 78 feet thick sand with 100% net-to-gross and 32% porosity, but turned out wet, with no evidence of hydrocarbon. The post well evaluation indicate that the excellent reservoir properties contributed to the false-positive amplitude anomaly that is typically attributed to a direct-hydrocarbon indicator in prospective reservoirs.\n A post-mortem was conducted to understand which element of the petroleum system failed resulting in the wet well outcome. Access to hydrocarbon charge and trap integrity were re-assessed as two possible geological failure mechanisms. Results of the investigation and preponderance of available evidence indicated that lack of charge access was the most likely reason for failure as there was no trace of thermogenic hydrocarbons in the entire stratigraphic interval drilled. The post-mortem also revealed that deep-seated faults extending into the charge kitchen act as major hydrocarbon migration conduits into target reservoirs within the field. Unfortunately, Well-X target reservoir was not connected to any of such faults and is located in what is now considered a ‘Charge-shadow’ zone of the field. A Fluid Inclusion Study (FIS) required to validate the charge theory is currently being embarked upon.\n A key learning from this well outcome is that access to charge is not ubiquitous, even in prolific fields or basins. A good understanding and clear definition of plausible migration pathways are critical to exploration success.","PeriodicalId":407977,"journal":{"name":"Day 3 Wed, August 02, 2023","volume":"27 1","pages":"0"},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"2023-07-30","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":"{\"title\":\"Drilling into a Charge Shadow Zone of a Prolific Niger Delta Field: Learnings from Well-X\",\"authors\":\"Ogunlana Ayodeji, Akingbade Kolawole, Falade Oladipo, Obilaja Olusegun, Chima Chikezie, H. Farran, Jenakumo Timipere, Orakwue Anita\",\"doi\":\"10.2118/217127-ms\",\"DOIUrl\":null,\"url\":null,\"abstract\":\"\\n Three decades on, a brownfield still springs surprises in the Deepwater Niger Delta. An Exploration well, Well-X was recently drilled targeting an amplitude-supported opportunity within a prolific geological interval in a Deepwater field. The well discovered excellent reservoir of 78 feet thick sand with 100% net-to-gross and 32% porosity, but turned out wet, with no evidence of hydrocarbon. The post well evaluation indicate that the excellent reservoir properties contributed to the false-positive amplitude anomaly that is typically attributed to a direct-hydrocarbon indicator in prospective reservoirs.\\n A post-mortem was conducted to understand which element of the petroleum system failed resulting in the wet well outcome. Access to hydrocarbon charge and trap integrity were re-assessed as two possible geological failure mechanisms. Results of the investigation and preponderance of available evidence indicated that lack of charge access was the most likely reason for failure as there was no trace of thermogenic hydrocarbons in the entire stratigraphic interval drilled. The post-mortem also revealed that deep-seated faults extending into the charge kitchen act as major hydrocarbon migration conduits into target reservoirs within the field. Unfortunately, Well-X target reservoir was not connected to any of such faults and is located in what is now considered a ‘Charge-shadow’ zone of the field. A Fluid Inclusion Study (FIS) required to validate the charge theory is currently being embarked upon.\\n A key learning from this well outcome is that access to charge is not ubiquitous, even in prolific fields or basins. A good understanding and clear definition of plausible migration pathways are critical to exploration success.\",\"PeriodicalId\":407977,\"journal\":{\"name\":\"Day 3 Wed, August 02, 2023\",\"volume\":\"27 1\",\"pages\":\"0\"},\"PeriodicalIF\":0.0000,\"publicationDate\":\"2023-07-30\",\"publicationTypes\":\"Journal Article\",\"fieldsOfStudy\":null,\"isOpenAccess\":false,\"openAccessPdf\":\"\",\"citationCount\":\"0\",\"resultStr\":null,\"platform\":\"Semanticscholar\",\"paperid\":null,\"PeriodicalName\":\"Day 3 Wed, August 02, 2023\",\"FirstCategoryId\":\"1085\",\"ListUrlMain\":\"https://doi.org/10.2118/217127-ms\",\"RegionNum\":0,\"RegionCategory\":null,\"ArticlePicture\":[],\"TitleCN\":null,\"AbstractTextCN\":null,\"PMCID\":null,\"EPubDate\":\"\",\"PubModel\":\"\",\"JCR\":\"\",\"JCRName\":\"\",\"Score\":null,\"Total\":0}","platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Day 3 Wed, August 02, 2023","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.2118/217127-ms","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"","JCRName":"","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

摘要

30年过去了,在尼日尔深水三角洲,一片棕地仍然给人们带来惊喜。最近,在深水油田一个多产的地质层段内钻了一口探井well - x,目标是一个幅度支持的机会。该井发现了78英尺厚的优质砂层,净总比为100%,孔隙度为32%,但结果是湿的,没有碳氢化合物的证据。井后评价表明,优异的储层性质导致了假阳性振幅异常,这通常归因于潜在储层的直接油气指示。进行了事后分析,以了解是石油系统的哪个元件失效导致了湿井结果。油气充注通道和圈闭完整性被重新评价为两种可能的地质破坏机制。调查结果和大量现有证据表明,缺乏电荷通道是失败的最可能原因,因为在整个地层段中没有发现热生烃的痕迹。事后分析还显示,延伸至充注灶的深层断裂是油气进入油田目标储层的主要运移通道。不幸的是,Well-X的目标储层没有连接到任何这样的断层,并且位于现在被认为是油田的“电荷阴影”区。目前正在进行一项验证电荷理论所需的流体包裹体研究(FIS)。从这口井的结果中得到的一个关键教训是,即使在高产油田或盆地,也不是无处不在。对合理迁移路径的充分理解和明确定义是勘探成功的关键。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
Drilling into a Charge Shadow Zone of a Prolific Niger Delta Field: Learnings from Well-X
Three decades on, a brownfield still springs surprises in the Deepwater Niger Delta. An Exploration well, Well-X was recently drilled targeting an amplitude-supported opportunity within a prolific geological interval in a Deepwater field. The well discovered excellent reservoir of 78 feet thick sand with 100% net-to-gross and 32% porosity, but turned out wet, with no evidence of hydrocarbon. The post well evaluation indicate that the excellent reservoir properties contributed to the false-positive amplitude anomaly that is typically attributed to a direct-hydrocarbon indicator in prospective reservoirs. A post-mortem was conducted to understand which element of the petroleum system failed resulting in the wet well outcome. Access to hydrocarbon charge and trap integrity were re-assessed as two possible geological failure mechanisms. Results of the investigation and preponderance of available evidence indicated that lack of charge access was the most likely reason for failure as there was no trace of thermogenic hydrocarbons in the entire stratigraphic interval drilled. The post-mortem also revealed that deep-seated faults extending into the charge kitchen act as major hydrocarbon migration conduits into target reservoirs within the field. Unfortunately, Well-X target reservoir was not connected to any of such faults and is located in what is now considered a ‘Charge-shadow’ zone of the field. A Fluid Inclusion Study (FIS) required to validate the charge theory is currently being embarked upon. A key learning from this well outcome is that access to charge is not ubiquitous, even in prolific fields or basins. A good understanding and clear definition of plausible migration pathways are critical to exploration success.
求助全文
通过发布文献求助,成功后即可免费获取论文全文。 去求助
来源期刊
自引率
0.00%
发文量
0
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术官方微信