《公约》损害可预见性标准研究

H. Cho, Min-Sook Kim
{"title":"《公约》损害可预见性标准研究","authors":"H. Cho, Min-Sook Kim","doi":"10.16980/jitc.19.3.202306.231","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"Purpose – This research aims to provide standards for the judgment of “foreseeability” in the general principle of compensation for damages in Art. 74 of CISG. Design/Methodology/Approach – This research analyzes the legal interpretation of CISG’s provisions related to damage (Art.74~Art.77) and related precedents. Findings – The results revealed the “principle of rationality” as a criterion for judging the “foreseeability” of Art.74 of CISG. Research Implications – From a practical point of view, it is difficult to predict the outcome of disputes in a situation where there is no standard for “foreseeability” as to the extent of damages from the point of view of the party liable under CISG. Therefore, it can be said that the appropriate criteria for “foreseeability” are essential. This paper presents the “principle of rationality” as a standard for. The rationality principles were extracted from the following three provisions of Art.74, namely Art.75~Art.77. These criteria are that the item of recoverable loss must be reasonable, and the amount of recoverable damage must be reasonable. This research is meaningful in presenting standards of damages to trade transaction practitioners.","PeriodicalId":166989,"journal":{"name":"Korea International Trade Research Institute","volume":"24 1","pages":"0"},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"2023-06-30","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":"{\"title\":\"A Study on the Standards for the Foreseeability of Damage in CISG\",\"authors\":\"H. Cho, Min-Sook Kim\",\"doi\":\"10.16980/jitc.19.3.202306.231\",\"DOIUrl\":null,\"url\":null,\"abstract\":\"Purpose – This research aims to provide standards for the judgment of “foreseeability” in the general principle of compensation for damages in Art. 74 of CISG. Design/Methodology/Approach – This research analyzes the legal interpretation of CISG’s provisions related to damage (Art.74~Art.77) and related precedents. Findings – The results revealed the “principle of rationality” as a criterion for judging the “foreseeability” of Art.74 of CISG. Research Implications – From a practical point of view, it is difficult to predict the outcome of disputes in a situation where there is no standard for “foreseeability” as to the extent of damages from the point of view of the party liable under CISG. Therefore, it can be said that the appropriate criteria for “foreseeability” are essential. This paper presents the “principle of rationality” as a standard for. The rationality principles were extracted from the following three provisions of Art.74, namely Art.75~Art.77. These criteria are that the item of recoverable loss must be reasonable, and the amount of recoverable damage must be reasonable. This research is meaningful in presenting standards of damages to trade transaction practitioners.\",\"PeriodicalId\":166989,\"journal\":{\"name\":\"Korea International Trade Research Institute\",\"volume\":\"24 1\",\"pages\":\"0\"},\"PeriodicalIF\":0.0000,\"publicationDate\":\"2023-06-30\",\"publicationTypes\":\"Journal Article\",\"fieldsOfStudy\":null,\"isOpenAccess\":false,\"openAccessPdf\":\"\",\"citationCount\":\"0\",\"resultStr\":null,\"platform\":\"Semanticscholar\",\"paperid\":null,\"PeriodicalName\":\"Korea International Trade Research Institute\",\"FirstCategoryId\":\"1085\",\"ListUrlMain\":\"https://doi.org/10.16980/jitc.19.3.202306.231\",\"RegionNum\":0,\"RegionCategory\":null,\"ArticlePicture\":[],\"TitleCN\":null,\"AbstractTextCN\":null,\"PMCID\":null,\"EPubDate\":\"\",\"PubModel\":\"\",\"JCR\":\"\",\"JCRName\":\"\",\"Score\":null,\"Total\":0}","platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Korea International Trade Research Institute","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.16980/jitc.19.3.202306.231","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"","JCRName":"","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

摘要

目的:本研究旨在为《公约》第74条损害赔偿一般原则中“可预见性”的判断提供标准。设计/方法/途径-本研究分析了CISG有关损害条款(第74条至第77条)的法律解释和相关判例。调查结果-结果显示,“合理性原则”是判断《销售公约》第74条“可预见性”的标准。研究意义-从实际的角度来看,在没有“可预见”标准的情况下,从《销售公约》规定的赔偿责任方的角度来看,很难预测纠纷的结果。因此,可以说“可预见性”的适当标准是必不可少的。本文提出了“合理性原则”作为一种标准。合理性原则是从第74条中提炼出来的,即第75条~第77条。这些标准是可恢复损失的项目必须合理,可恢复损害的数额必须合理。本研究对贸易交易从业者提出损害赔偿标准具有重要意义。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
A Study on the Standards for the Foreseeability of Damage in CISG
Purpose – This research aims to provide standards for the judgment of “foreseeability” in the general principle of compensation for damages in Art. 74 of CISG. Design/Methodology/Approach – This research analyzes the legal interpretation of CISG’s provisions related to damage (Art.74~Art.77) and related precedents. Findings – The results revealed the “principle of rationality” as a criterion for judging the “foreseeability” of Art.74 of CISG. Research Implications – From a practical point of view, it is difficult to predict the outcome of disputes in a situation where there is no standard for “foreseeability” as to the extent of damages from the point of view of the party liable under CISG. Therefore, it can be said that the appropriate criteria for “foreseeability” are essential. This paper presents the “principle of rationality” as a standard for. The rationality principles were extracted from the following three provisions of Art.74, namely Art.75~Art.77. These criteria are that the item of recoverable loss must be reasonable, and the amount of recoverable damage must be reasonable. This research is meaningful in presenting standards of damages to trade transaction practitioners.
求助全文
通过发布文献求助,成功后即可免费获取论文全文。 去求助
来源期刊
自引率
0.00%
发文量
0
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:604180095
Book学术官方微信