性别、年龄与专业:1953 - 2003年德国政治学家学术生涯的影响因素

Michèle Knodt, Peter Kotzian
{"title":"性别、年龄与专业:1953 - 2003年德国政治学家学术生涯的影响因素","authors":"Michèle Knodt, Peter Kotzian","doi":"10.2174/1874945300902010054","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"Using academic careers, this paper will contribute to the empirical sociology of professions. Until recently, academic careers in Germany were highly regulated, following a predefined pattern of three steps. Contrasting with these regulations, there are numerous informal hypotheses and beliefs in the academic community about factors for success. This paper analyzes their actual impact. We find both a substantial variation and a substantial role for chance. Variation in the duration of a step is highest in the habilitation step. While there is much unexplained variation in how the Ph.D. step is executed, the two steps following are more influenced by few factors. In particular, the length of the final step - the waiting period for a professorship - is beyond the control of the individual and highly determined by the cyclical supply of vacant professorships with a fitting profile. While we cannot comment on the decision of women to leave academia, an effect of gender occurs only in the first of the three steps of a typical career, presumably due to the decision to have a child.","PeriodicalId":285033,"journal":{"name":"The Open Social Science Journal","volume":"2 1","pages":"0"},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"2009-04-30","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"1","resultStr":"{\"title\":\"Gender, Age and Specialization: Factors in Academic Careers of Political Scientists in Germany 1953 - 2003\",\"authors\":\"Michèle Knodt, Peter Kotzian\",\"doi\":\"10.2174/1874945300902010054\",\"DOIUrl\":null,\"url\":null,\"abstract\":\"Using academic careers, this paper will contribute to the empirical sociology of professions. Until recently, academic careers in Germany were highly regulated, following a predefined pattern of three steps. Contrasting with these regulations, there are numerous informal hypotheses and beliefs in the academic community about factors for success. This paper analyzes their actual impact. We find both a substantial variation and a substantial role for chance. Variation in the duration of a step is highest in the habilitation step. While there is much unexplained variation in how the Ph.D. step is executed, the two steps following are more influenced by few factors. In particular, the length of the final step - the waiting period for a professorship - is beyond the control of the individual and highly determined by the cyclical supply of vacant professorships with a fitting profile. While we cannot comment on the decision of women to leave academia, an effect of gender occurs only in the first of the three steps of a typical career, presumably due to the decision to have a child.\",\"PeriodicalId\":285033,\"journal\":{\"name\":\"The Open Social Science Journal\",\"volume\":\"2 1\",\"pages\":\"0\"},\"PeriodicalIF\":0.0000,\"publicationDate\":\"2009-04-30\",\"publicationTypes\":\"Journal Article\",\"fieldsOfStudy\":null,\"isOpenAccess\":false,\"openAccessPdf\":\"\",\"citationCount\":\"1\",\"resultStr\":null,\"platform\":\"Semanticscholar\",\"paperid\":null,\"PeriodicalName\":\"The Open Social Science Journal\",\"FirstCategoryId\":\"1085\",\"ListUrlMain\":\"https://doi.org/10.2174/1874945300902010054\",\"RegionNum\":0,\"RegionCategory\":null,\"ArticlePicture\":[],\"TitleCN\":null,\"AbstractTextCN\":null,\"PMCID\":null,\"EPubDate\":\"\",\"PubModel\":\"\",\"JCR\":\"\",\"JCRName\":\"\",\"Score\":null,\"Total\":0}","platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"The Open Social Science Journal","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.2174/1874945300902010054","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"","JCRName":"","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 1

摘要

运用学术生涯,本文将有助于职业的实证社会学。直到最近,德国的学术生涯都受到高度监管,遵循着预先确定的三步模式。与这些规定形成对比的是,学术界有许多关于成功因素的非正式假设和信念。本文分析了它们的实际影响。我们发现有很大的变化,也有很大的偶然性。在一个步骤的持续时间的变化是最高的在适应步骤。虽然博士学位步骤的执行方式有很多无法解释的变化,但接下来的两个步骤更多地受到少数因素的影响。特别是,最后一步——教授职位的等待期——的长度超出了个人的控制范围,在很大程度上取决于具有合适履历的空缺教授职位的周期性供应。虽然我们不能评论女性离开学术界的决定,但性别的影响只发生在典型职业生涯的三个步骤中的第一步,大概是由于生孩子的决定。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
Gender, Age and Specialization: Factors in Academic Careers of Political Scientists in Germany 1953 - 2003
Using academic careers, this paper will contribute to the empirical sociology of professions. Until recently, academic careers in Germany were highly regulated, following a predefined pattern of three steps. Contrasting with these regulations, there are numerous informal hypotheses and beliefs in the academic community about factors for success. This paper analyzes their actual impact. We find both a substantial variation and a substantial role for chance. Variation in the duration of a step is highest in the habilitation step. While there is much unexplained variation in how the Ph.D. step is executed, the two steps following are more influenced by few factors. In particular, the length of the final step - the waiting period for a professorship - is beyond the control of the individual and highly determined by the cyclical supply of vacant professorships with a fitting profile. While we cannot comment on the decision of women to leave academia, an effect of gender occurs only in the first of the three steps of a typical career, presumably due to the decision to have a child.
求助全文
通过发布文献求助,成功后即可免费获取论文全文。 去求助
来源期刊
自引率
0.00%
发文量
0
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:604180095
Book学术官方微信