{"title":"用随机森林法分类红斑鳞状皮肤病","authors":"Ashutosh Kumar Singh, Dwaiypayan Mukhopadhyay","doi":"10.47363/jdmrs/2023(4)143","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"Machine Learning (ML) methods have found wide applications in dermatology (Chan et al., 2020) [1]. Thomsen, Iversen, Titlestad & Winther (2020) reviewed 2175 publications and found that the most common usage of ML methods was in the binary classification of malignant melanoma from images [2]. Adamson and Smith have a word of advice about usage of ML methods in diagnosis of skin diseases that inclusivity must be kept in mind for classification results to be accurate [3]. Steele et al. searched PubMed, Embase, and CENTRAL, and found that the performance of ML methods was variable, and overall accuracy measure was not a good measure for sub-group accuracy [4].","PeriodicalId":203275,"journal":{"name":"Journal of Dermatology Research Reviews & Reports","volume":"2 4","pages":"0"},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"2023-02-28","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":"{\"title\":\"Classification of Erythematosquamous Dermatosis by the Method of Random Forest\",\"authors\":\"Ashutosh Kumar Singh, Dwaiypayan Mukhopadhyay\",\"doi\":\"10.47363/jdmrs/2023(4)143\",\"DOIUrl\":null,\"url\":null,\"abstract\":\"Machine Learning (ML) methods have found wide applications in dermatology (Chan et al., 2020) [1]. Thomsen, Iversen, Titlestad & Winther (2020) reviewed 2175 publications and found that the most common usage of ML methods was in the binary classification of malignant melanoma from images [2]. Adamson and Smith have a word of advice about usage of ML methods in diagnosis of skin diseases that inclusivity must be kept in mind for classification results to be accurate [3]. Steele et al. searched PubMed, Embase, and CENTRAL, and found that the performance of ML methods was variable, and overall accuracy measure was not a good measure for sub-group accuracy [4].\",\"PeriodicalId\":203275,\"journal\":{\"name\":\"Journal of Dermatology Research Reviews & Reports\",\"volume\":\"2 4\",\"pages\":\"0\"},\"PeriodicalIF\":0.0000,\"publicationDate\":\"2023-02-28\",\"publicationTypes\":\"Journal Article\",\"fieldsOfStudy\":null,\"isOpenAccess\":false,\"openAccessPdf\":\"\",\"citationCount\":\"0\",\"resultStr\":null,\"platform\":\"Semanticscholar\",\"paperid\":null,\"PeriodicalName\":\"Journal of Dermatology Research Reviews & Reports\",\"FirstCategoryId\":\"1085\",\"ListUrlMain\":\"https://doi.org/10.47363/jdmrs/2023(4)143\",\"RegionNum\":0,\"RegionCategory\":null,\"ArticlePicture\":[],\"TitleCN\":null,\"AbstractTextCN\":null,\"PMCID\":null,\"EPubDate\":\"\",\"PubModel\":\"\",\"JCR\":\"\",\"JCRName\":\"\",\"Score\":null,\"Total\":0}","platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Journal of Dermatology Research Reviews & Reports","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.47363/jdmrs/2023(4)143","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"","JCRName":"","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0
摘要
机器学习(ML)方法在皮肤病学中得到了广泛应用(Chan et al., 2020)[1]。Thomsen, Iversen, Titlestad & Winther(2020)回顾了2175篇出版物,发现ML方法最常见的用途是从图像中对恶性黑色素瘤进行二值分类[2]。Adamson和Smith对机器学习方法在皮肤病诊断中的应用提出了一个建议,即必须牢记包容性,才能使分类结果准确[3]。Steele等人检索了PubMed、Embase和CENTRAL,发现ML方法的性能是可变的,总体准确度度量并不是子组准确度的良好度量[4]。
Classification of Erythematosquamous Dermatosis by the Method of Random Forest
Machine Learning (ML) methods have found wide applications in dermatology (Chan et al., 2020) [1]. Thomsen, Iversen, Titlestad & Winther (2020) reviewed 2175 publications and found that the most common usage of ML methods was in the binary classification of malignant melanoma from images [2]. Adamson and Smith have a word of advice about usage of ML methods in diagnosis of skin diseases that inclusivity must be kept in mind for classification results to be accurate [3]. Steele et al. searched PubMed, Embase, and CENTRAL, and found that the performance of ML methods was variable, and overall accuracy measure was not a good measure for sub-group accuracy [4].