普桑的绘画笔记

A. Blunt
{"title":"普桑的绘画笔记","authors":"A. Blunt","doi":"10.2307/750002","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"At the end of his life of Poussin, Bellori prints a number of comments on painting which he claims to have seen in Poussin's writing when they were in the library of Cardinal Massimi. The latter showed them to Pierre le Maire, who apparently handed them on to Bellori.' These notes are important to students of Poussin, as they contain a more considered statement of an approach towards painting than any to be found in the artist's letters. Up to the present critics have always accepted them as original writings of Poussin and have treated them with corresponding respect. But it is the purpose of the present article to show that they are rather notes made by Poussin on his reading. This being the case, we are still entitled to regard them as relevant to the artist's views, but we must use them with circumspection. Poussin no doubt often copied down passages which agreed with his own opinion, but he may also have noted other sections in order to refute them. Without further evidence, therefore, it is only safe to assume that the notes deal with subjects which interested Poussin, not that they necessarily express his own views on these subjects. We know from various sources that Poussin intended to write a book in which he would have expressed his theories about the arts, but that he never came to the point of composing it. On the other hand he certainly made notes for it, to which he refers in a letter written in 1650 : \"J'ai aussi cru de faire mieux de ne pas laisser voir le jour aux avertissemens que je commences a ourdir sur le fait de la peinture.\" ' Bellori's account of the matter is more explicit : \"Ebbe egli sempre in animo di compilare un libro di Pittura, annotando varie materie, e ricordi secondo leggeva, o contemplava da se stesso con fine di ordinarli, quando per l'eth non avesse piii potuto operare col pennello.\"3 Sandrart, who knew Poussin when he was in Rome between 1627 and 1635, confirms this description of the artist's methods: \"Er war sonsten auch von gutem Discurss, und hatte stets ein Biichlein, worein er alles n6thige, so wol mit dem Umriss als auch Buchstaben aufgezeichnet, bey sich.\"' Poussin, therefore, was in the habit during his life in Rome of jotting down on paper his own ideas on painting and also notes on what he read. On the other hand he never embarked on the composition of the book which he intended to write, presumably because he found that he was still able to paint, though with some difficulty, till the last days of his life. After his death some of his friends thought that he had left behind writings on the arts, and Chantelou wrote to make enquiries on this subject of Poussin's brother-in-law, Jean Dughet, who replied that the artist had only left certain extracts which Dughet had made for him from the works of Matheo Zaccolini and Witelo on optics and perspective. Fdlibien, who quotes this letter, comes to the following conclusion : \"Vous","PeriodicalId":410128,"journal":{"name":"Journal of the Warburg Institute","volume":"217 1","pages":"0"},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"1938-04-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"3","resultStr":"{\"title\":\"Poussin's Notes on Painting\",\"authors\":\"A. Blunt\",\"doi\":\"10.2307/750002\",\"DOIUrl\":null,\"url\":null,\"abstract\":\"At the end of his life of Poussin, Bellori prints a number of comments on painting which he claims to have seen in Poussin's writing when they were in the library of Cardinal Massimi. The latter showed them to Pierre le Maire, who apparently handed them on to Bellori.' These notes are important to students of Poussin, as they contain a more considered statement of an approach towards painting than any to be found in the artist's letters. Up to the present critics have always accepted them as original writings of Poussin and have treated them with corresponding respect. But it is the purpose of the present article to show that they are rather notes made by Poussin on his reading. This being the case, we are still entitled to regard them as relevant to the artist's views, but we must use them with circumspection. Poussin no doubt often copied down passages which agreed with his own opinion, but he may also have noted other sections in order to refute them. Without further evidence, therefore, it is only safe to assume that the notes deal with subjects which interested Poussin, not that they necessarily express his own views on these subjects. We know from various sources that Poussin intended to write a book in which he would have expressed his theories about the arts, but that he never came to the point of composing it. On the other hand he certainly made notes for it, to which he refers in a letter written in 1650 : \\\"J'ai aussi cru de faire mieux de ne pas laisser voir le jour aux avertissemens que je commences a ourdir sur le fait de la peinture.\\\" ' Bellori's account of the matter is more explicit : \\\"Ebbe egli sempre in animo di compilare un libro di Pittura, annotando varie materie, e ricordi secondo leggeva, o contemplava da se stesso con fine di ordinarli, quando per l'eth non avesse piii potuto operare col pennello.\\\"3 Sandrart, who knew Poussin when he was in Rome between 1627 and 1635, confirms this description of the artist's methods: \\\"Er war sonsten auch von gutem Discurss, und hatte stets ein Biichlein, worein er alles n6thige, so wol mit dem Umriss als auch Buchstaben aufgezeichnet, bey sich.\\\"' Poussin, therefore, was in the habit during his life in Rome of jotting down on paper his own ideas on painting and also notes on what he read. On the other hand he never embarked on the composition of the book which he intended to write, presumably because he found that he was still able to paint, though with some difficulty, till the last days of his life. After his death some of his friends thought that he had left behind writings on the arts, and Chantelou wrote to make enquiries on this subject of Poussin's brother-in-law, Jean Dughet, who replied that the artist had only left certain extracts which Dughet had made for him from the works of Matheo Zaccolini and Witelo on optics and perspective. Fdlibien, who quotes this letter, comes to the following conclusion : \\\"Vous\",\"PeriodicalId\":410128,\"journal\":{\"name\":\"Journal of the Warburg Institute\",\"volume\":\"217 1\",\"pages\":\"0\"},\"PeriodicalIF\":0.0000,\"publicationDate\":\"1938-04-01\",\"publicationTypes\":\"Journal Article\",\"fieldsOfStudy\":null,\"isOpenAccess\":false,\"openAccessPdf\":\"\",\"citationCount\":\"3\",\"resultStr\":null,\"platform\":\"Semanticscholar\",\"paperid\":null,\"PeriodicalName\":\"Journal of the Warburg Institute\",\"FirstCategoryId\":\"1085\",\"ListUrlMain\":\"https://doi.org/10.2307/750002\",\"RegionNum\":0,\"RegionCategory\":null,\"ArticlePicture\":[],\"TitleCN\":null,\"AbstractTextCN\":null,\"PMCID\":null,\"EPubDate\":\"\",\"PubModel\":\"\",\"JCR\":\"\",\"JCRName\":\"\",\"Score\":null,\"Total\":0}","platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Journal of the Warburg Institute","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.2307/750002","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"","JCRName":"","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 3

摘要

在普桑生命的最后,贝洛里出版了一些关于绘画的评论,他声称在普桑的写作中看到了这些评论,当时他们在红衣主教马西米的图书馆里。后者把它们拿给皮埃尔看,皮埃尔显然把它们交给了贝洛里。”这些笔记对普桑的学生很重要,因为它们包含了比任何艺术家信件中发现的更深思熟虑的绘画方法声明。到目前为止,批评家们一直认为它们是普桑的原创作品,并给予相应的尊重。但这篇文章的目的是要说明它们是普桑在阅读时所作的笔记。在这种情况下,我们仍然有权认为它们与艺术家的观点有关,但我们必须谨慎地使用它们。毫无疑问,普桑经常抄下与他自己观点一致的段落,但他也可能注意到其他部分,以便反驳它们。因此,在没有进一步证据的情况下,我们只能假设这些笔记涉及的是普桑感兴趣的主题,而不一定是他自己对这些主题的看法。我们从各种来源得知,普桑打算写一本书,在书中他将表达他对艺术的理论,但他从来没有想到要把它写出来。另一方面,他当然也为此做了笔记,他在1650年写的一封信中提到:“J'ai aussi cru de faire miux de ne pas laisser voir our aux adessens que ences a ourdir sur le fait de la peinture”。贝洛里对这件事的描述更为明确:“ebe egli sempre in animo di compilare unlibro di Pittura, annotando different material, e ricordi secondo leggeva, o contemplava da se stesso confine di ararli, quando per l'eth non avesse piii potuto operare col penello。”1627年至1635年间,当普桑在罗马时,桑德拉特认识了他,他证实了对这位艺术家的方法的描述:“Er war sonsten auch von gutem discurse, und hatte stets in Biichlein,在所有的地方都工作,所以他们的Umriss als auch Buchstaben aufgezeichnet, bey sich。”因此,在罗马生活期间,普桑有一种习惯,就是在纸上记下自己对绘画的看法,也记下自己读过的东西。另一方面,他从来没有着手写他打算写的书,大概是因为他发现他仍然能够画,虽然有些困难,直到他生命的最后几天。他死后,他的一些朋友认为他留下了一些关于艺术的著作,尚特罗写信向普桑的姐夫让·杜杰询问这个问题,杜杰回答说,普桑只留下了杜杰为他从马提奥·扎克洛尼和维特洛关于光学和透视的作品中摘录的一些片段。Fdlibien引用了这封信,得出如下结论:“各位
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
Poussin's Notes on Painting
At the end of his life of Poussin, Bellori prints a number of comments on painting which he claims to have seen in Poussin's writing when they were in the library of Cardinal Massimi. The latter showed them to Pierre le Maire, who apparently handed them on to Bellori.' These notes are important to students of Poussin, as they contain a more considered statement of an approach towards painting than any to be found in the artist's letters. Up to the present critics have always accepted them as original writings of Poussin and have treated them with corresponding respect. But it is the purpose of the present article to show that they are rather notes made by Poussin on his reading. This being the case, we are still entitled to regard them as relevant to the artist's views, but we must use them with circumspection. Poussin no doubt often copied down passages which agreed with his own opinion, but he may also have noted other sections in order to refute them. Without further evidence, therefore, it is only safe to assume that the notes deal with subjects which interested Poussin, not that they necessarily express his own views on these subjects. We know from various sources that Poussin intended to write a book in which he would have expressed his theories about the arts, but that he never came to the point of composing it. On the other hand he certainly made notes for it, to which he refers in a letter written in 1650 : "J'ai aussi cru de faire mieux de ne pas laisser voir le jour aux avertissemens que je commences a ourdir sur le fait de la peinture." ' Bellori's account of the matter is more explicit : "Ebbe egli sempre in animo di compilare un libro di Pittura, annotando varie materie, e ricordi secondo leggeva, o contemplava da se stesso con fine di ordinarli, quando per l'eth non avesse piii potuto operare col pennello."3 Sandrart, who knew Poussin when he was in Rome between 1627 and 1635, confirms this description of the artist's methods: "Er war sonsten auch von gutem Discurss, und hatte stets ein Biichlein, worein er alles n6thige, so wol mit dem Umriss als auch Buchstaben aufgezeichnet, bey sich."' Poussin, therefore, was in the habit during his life in Rome of jotting down on paper his own ideas on painting and also notes on what he read. On the other hand he never embarked on the composition of the book which he intended to write, presumably because he found that he was still able to paint, though with some difficulty, till the last days of his life. After his death some of his friends thought that he had left behind writings on the arts, and Chantelou wrote to make enquiries on this subject of Poussin's brother-in-law, Jean Dughet, who replied that the artist had only left certain extracts which Dughet had made for him from the works of Matheo Zaccolini and Witelo on optics and perspective. Fdlibien, who quotes this letter, comes to the following conclusion : "Vous
求助全文
通过发布文献求助,成功后即可免费获取论文全文。 去求助
来源期刊
自引率
0.00%
发文量
0
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术官方微信