(الاختيارات الفقهية للسيد محمد حسين فضل الله -الغناء أنموذجا -دراسة مقارنة) ظاهر محسن عبد الله

The opinions of Muslim jurists on the issue of singing conflicted, to the extent that they did not agree on defining the subject of prohibition. And is the customary custom, whether it is the custom of the people or the custom of the female legislator, and the female legislator are the jurists, and the fuqaha’ according to the people of the language, and the summary of these opinions is to assign the concept of singing to the custom like any other concept from the jurisprudential point of view, for it is every sound that agrees with the custom by being singing, regardless of any other characteristic. It, and what comes from non-humans, may come from the use of stringed and wind instruments and others, which is music, and it may come from animals like the chirping of birds. It is not devoid of metaphors, for what is important in singing is the human voice and music. Someone might say or it comes to one of us that music is not singing. Rather, we understand from another window that most music is singing if it is associated with a human voice, and there is no doubt that its association with the human voice has become a real part of it. , And the custom considers that there is a qualitative homogeneity between the two individuals, whether singing or music associated with a singing human voice, and the result is that music is music in both cases, even if it is stripped of human singing, and therefore the singing prohibited in the narratives that we will present later is what was performed in the homes of the rich and the princes And what was accompanied by prostitution and promiscuity and drinking alcohol. Keywords: singing - music - evidence of inviolability -evidence of permissibility.