国际联合教育项目发展中竞争者的定义与评价

Ting Zhu
{"title":"国际联合教育项目发展中竞争者的定义与评价","authors":"Ting Zhu","doi":"10.32347/2412-9933.2022.51.122-129","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"The article is devoted to the problems of defining and evaluating competitors\n within the framework of competitive benchmarking projects in education. Various\n approaches to defining the definitions of \"benchmarking\" and \"partner benchmarking\" in\n domestic scientific practice have been studied. The content field of the specified\n definitions was clarified by formulating the author's definitions of \"benchmarking\" and\n \"partner benchmarking in education\". Peculiarities of partner benchmarking in education,\n which are determined by the differences between the educational process and the business\n processes of industrial enterprises and commercial organizations, have been studied.\n Partnership benchmarking in education requires a more creative approach, its algorithms\n should be more flexible and less standardized than those used in benchmarking\n partnership projects of business entities. In the research process, it was demonstrated\n that certain partner benchmarking tools used by commercial companies can, with certain\n adaptations, be used in partner benchmarking projects in education. In particular, this\n applies to such a tool as the identification of reference leaders by individual\n positions in the survey process. It is substantiated that it is more expedient to use\n process-oriented benchmarking in education given the fact that the key object of partner\n benchmarking in education is the educational process and educational practices that are\n its components.","PeriodicalId":321731,"journal":{"name":"Management of Development of Complex Systems","volume":"27 1","pages":"0"},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"2022-10-07","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":"{\"title\":\"DEFINITION AND EVALUATION OF COMPETITORS IN THE DEVELOPMENT OF INTERNATIONAL JOINT\\n EDUCATIONAL PROJECTS\",\"authors\":\"Ting Zhu\",\"doi\":\"10.32347/2412-9933.2022.51.122-129\",\"DOIUrl\":null,\"url\":null,\"abstract\":\"The article is devoted to the problems of defining and evaluating competitors\\n within the framework of competitive benchmarking projects in education. Various\\n approaches to defining the definitions of \\\"benchmarking\\\" and \\\"partner benchmarking\\\" in\\n domestic scientific practice have been studied. The content field of the specified\\n definitions was clarified by formulating the author's definitions of \\\"benchmarking\\\" and\\n \\\"partner benchmarking in education\\\". Peculiarities of partner benchmarking in education,\\n which are determined by the differences between the educational process and the business\\n processes of industrial enterprises and commercial organizations, have been studied.\\n Partnership benchmarking in education requires a more creative approach, its algorithms\\n should be more flexible and less standardized than those used in benchmarking\\n partnership projects of business entities. In the research process, it was demonstrated\\n that certain partner benchmarking tools used by commercial companies can, with certain\\n adaptations, be used in partner benchmarking projects in education. In particular, this\\n applies to such a tool as the identification of reference leaders by individual\\n positions in the survey process. It is substantiated that it is more expedient to use\\n process-oriented benchmarking in education given the fact that the key object of partner\\n benchmarking in education is the educational process and educational practices that are\\n its components.\",\"PeriodicalId\":321731,\"journal\":{\"name\":\"Management of Development of Complex Systems\",\"volume\":\"27 1\",\"pages\":\"0\"},\"PeriodicalIF\":0.0000,\"publicationDate\":\"2022-10-07\",\"publicationTypes\":\"Journal Article\",\"fieldsOfStudy\":null,\"isOpenAccess\":false,\"openAccessPdf\":\"\",\"citationCount\":\"0\",\"resultStr\":null,\"platform\":\"Semanticscholar\",\"paperid\":null,\"PeriodicalName\":\"Management of Development of Complex Systems\",\"FirstCategoryId\":\"1085\",\"ListUrlMain\":\"https://doi.org/10.32347/2412-9933.2022.51.122-129\",\"RegionNum\":0,\"RegionCategory\":null,\"ArticlePicture\":[],\"TitleCN\":null,\"AbstractTextCN\":null,\"PMCID\":null,\"EPubDate\":\"\",\"PubModel\":\"\",\"JCR\":\"\",\"JCRName\":\"\",\"Score\":null,\"Total\":0}","platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Management of Development of Complex Systems","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.32347/2412-9933.2022.51.122-129","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"","JCRName":"","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

摘要

本文致力于在教育竞争基准项目的框架内定义和评估竞争对手的问题。在国内科学实践中,对“标杆管理”和“合作伙伴标杆管理”定义的各种方法进行了研究。通过阐述作者对“标杆管理”和“教育合作伙伴标杆管理”的定义,明确了指定定义的内容领域。研究了合作伙伴对标在教育中的特殊性,这种特殊性是由教育过程与工业企业和商业组织的业务过程的差异所决定的。教育领域的伙伴关系对标需要一种更具创造性的方法,其算法应该比商业实体的伙伴关系对标项目更加灵活,而不是标准化。在研究过程中,证明了商业公司使用的某些合作伙伴基准工具,经过一定的调整,可以用于教育领域的合作伙伴基准项目。这尤其适用于这样一种工具,即在调查过程中根据个人职位识别参考领导者。事实证明,在教育中使用以过程为导向的标杆管理更为有利,因为教育中伙伴标杆管理的主要对象是作为其组成部分的教育过程和教育实践。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
DEFINITION AND EVALUATION OF COMPETITORS IN THE DEVELOPMENT OF INTERNATIONAL JOINT EDUCATIONAL PROJECTS
The article is devoted to the problems of defining and evaluating competitors within the framework of competitive benchmarking projects in education. Various approaches to defining the definitions of "benchmarking" and "partner benchmarking" in domestic scientific practice have been studied. The content field of the specified definitions was clarified by formulating the author's definitions of "benchmarking" and "partner benchmarking in education". Peculiarities of partner benchmarking in education, which are determined by the differences between the educational process and the business processes of industrial enterprises and commercial organizations, have been studied. Partnership benchmarking in education requires a more creative approach, its algorithms should be more flexible and less standardized than those used in benchmarking partnership projects of business entities. In the research process, it was demonstrated that certain partner benchmarking tools used by commercial companies can, with certain adaptations, be used in partner benchmarking projects in education. In particular, this applies to such a tool as the identification of reference leaders by individual positions in the survey process. It is substantiated that it is more expedient to use process-oriented benchmarking in education given the fact that the key object of partner benchmarking in education is the educational process and educational practices that are its components.
求助全文
通过发布文献求助,成功后即可免费获取论文全文。 去求助
来源期刊
自引率
0.00%
发文量
0
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:604180095
Book学术官方微信