{"title":"国际联合教育项目发展中竞争者的定义与评价","authors":"Ting Zhu","doi":"10.32347/2412-9933.2022.51.122-129","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"The article is devoted to the problems of defining and evaluating competitors\n within the framework of competitive benchmarking projects in education. Various\n approaches to defining the definitions of \"benchmarking\" and \"partner benchmarking\" in\n domestic scientific practice have been studied. The content field of the specified\n definitions was clarified by formulating the author's definitions of \"benchmarking\" and\n \"partner benchmarking in education\". Peculiarities of partner benchmarking in education,\n which are determined by the differences between the educational process and the business\n processes of industrial enterprises and commercial organizations, have been studied.\n Partnership benchmarking in education requires a more creative approach, its algorithms\n should be more flexible and less standardized than those used in benchmarking\n partnership projects of business entities. In the research process, it was demonstrated\n that certain partner benchmarking tools used by commercial companies can, with certain\n adaptations, be used in partner benchmarking projects in education. In particular, this\n applies to such a tool as the identification of reference leaders by individual\n positions in the survey process. It is substantiated that it is more expedient to use\n process-oriented benchmarking in education given the fact that the key object of partner\n benchmarking in education is the educational process and educational practices that are\n its components.","PeriodicalId":321731,"journal":{"name":"Management of Development of Complex Systems","volume":"27 1","pages":"0"},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"2022-10-07","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":"{\"title\":\"DEFINITION AND EVALUATION OF COMPETITORS IN THE DEVELOPMENT OF INTERNATIONAL JOINT\\n EDUCATIONAL PROJECTS\",\"authors\":\"Ting Zhu\",\"doi\":\"10.32347/2412-9933.2022.51.122-129\",\"DOIUrl\":null,\"url\":null,\"abstract\":\"The article is devoted to the problems of defining and evaluating competitors\\n within the framework of competitive benchmarking projects in education. Various\\n approaches to defining the definitions of \\\"benchmarking\\\" and \\\"partner benchmarking\\\" in\\n domestic scientific practice have been studied. The content field of the specified\\n definitions was clarified by formulating the author's definitions of \\\"benchmarking\\\" and\\n \\\"partner benchmarking in education\\\". Peculiarities of partner benchmarking in education,\\n which are determined by the differences between the educational process and the business\\n processes of industrial enterprises and commercial organizations, have been studied.\\n Partnership benchmarking in education requires a more creative approach, its algorithms\\n should be more flexible and less standardized than those used in benchmarking\\n partnership projects of business entities. In the research process, it was demonstrated\\n that certain partner benchmarking tools used by commercial companies can, with certain\\n adaptations, be used in partner benchmarking projects in education. In particular, this\\n applies to such a tool as the identification of reference leaders by individual\\n positions in the survey process. It is substantiated that it is more expedient to use\\n process-oriented benchmarking in education given the fact that the key object of partner\\n benchmarking in education is the educational process and educational practices that are\\n its components.\",\"PeriodicalId\":321731,\"journal\":{\"name\":\"Management of Development of Complex Systems\",\"volume\":\"27 1\",\"pages\":\"0\"},\"PeriodicalIF\":0.0000,\"publicationDate\":\"2022-10-07\",\"publicationTypes\":\"Journal Article\",\"fieldsOfStudy\":null,\"isOpenAccess\":false,\"openAccessPdf\":\"\",\"citationCount\":\"0\",\"resultStr\":null,\"platform\":\"Semanticscholar\",\"paperid\":null,\"PeriodicalName\":\"Management of Development of Complex Systems\",\"FirstCategoryId\":\"1085\",\"ListUrlMain\":\"https://doi.org/10.32347/2412-9933.2022.51.122-129\",\"RegionNum\":0,\"RegionCategory\":null,\"ArticlePicture\":[],\"TitleCN\":null,\"AbstractTextCN\":null,\"PMCID\":null,\"EPubDate\":\"\",\"PubModel\":\"\",\"JCR\":\"\",\"JCRName\":\"\",\"Score\":null,\"Total\":0}","platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Management of Development of Complex Systems","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.32347/2412-9933.2022.51.122-129","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"","JCRName":"","Score":null,"Total":0}
DEFINITION AND EVALUATION OF COMPETITORS IN THE DEVELOPMENT OF INTERNATIONAL JOINT
EDUCATIONAL PROJECTS
The article is devoted to the problems of defining and evaluating competitors
within the framework of competitive benchmarking projects in education. Various
approaches to defining the definitions of "benchmarking" and "partner benchmarking" in
domestic scientific practice have been studied. The content field of the specified
definitions was clarified by formulating the author's definitions of "benchmarking" and
"partner benchmarking in education". Peculiarities of partner benchmarking in education,
which are determined by the differences between the educational process and the business
processes of industrial enterprises and commercial organizations, have been studied.
Partnership benchmarking in education requires a more creative approach, its algorithms
should be more flexible and less standardized than those used in benchmarking
partnership projects of business entities. In the research process, it was demonstrated
that certain partner benchmarking tools used by commercial companies can, with certain
adaptations, be used in partner benchmarking projects in education. In particular, this
applies to such a tool as the identification of reference leaders by individual
positions in the survey process. It is substantiated that it is more expedient to use
process-oriented benchmarking in education given the fact that the key object of partner
benchmarking in education is the educational process and educational practices that are
its components.