肩胛上神经阻滞和水扩术治疗肩周炎的功能结果比较的随机对照研究

Suyash Singhania, Pravin Bande, Rajiv V. Kulkarni, Sagar Wajekar, Tejal Kothmire, M. Singh
{"title":"肩胛上神经阻滞和水扩术治疗肩周炎的功能结果比较的随机对照研究","authors":"Suyash Singhania, Pravin Bande, Rajiv V. Kulkarni, Sagar Wajekar, Tejal Kothmire, M. Singh","doi":"10.37515/ortho.8231.4305","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"Background: Frozen shoulder or adhesive capsulitis (AC) is a common musculoskeletal disease which imposes significant morbidity and affects the quality of life. The present study was done to compare the effectiveness of the suprascapular nerve block (SSNB) under ultrasound guidance and hydrodistension in the management of AC. Materials and Methods: This prospective randomized control study was conducted in 60 patients visiting the Department of Orthopaedic Surgery, BARC Hospital, Mumbai, with AC not improving with physiotherapy. Patients were divided into Group A (n = 30) who received SSNB under ultrasound guidance in addition to physiotherapy and Group B (n = 30) who underwent hydrodistension of shoulder in addition to physiotherapy. Values for the ROM, Quick DASH score, and visual analog scale (VAS) score were obtained for each patient at the baseline and at 4, 8, and 12 weeks. Results: Female preponderance was observed in both the groups and overall 22% werediabetics. The difference in improvement in flexion, abduction, external rotation, and internal rotation from baseline to 12 weeks, 4 to 8 weeks, 4 to 12 weeks, and 8 to 12 weeks was higher in hydrodistension group as compared to SSNB group (p < 0.05). The decrease in the VAS and Quick DASH scores from baseline to 12 weeks was higher in hydrodistension group as compared to SSNB group (p < 0.05). Conclusion: Both SSNB and hydrodistension are useful in the management of AC. However, hydrodistension displayed better outcome as compared to SSNB in improving the functional outcome of patients.","PeriodicalId":252930,"journal":{"name":"Hong Kong Journal of Orthopaedic Research","volume":"215 1","pages":"0"},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"2021-12-30","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":"{\"title\":\"Randomized control study comparing the functional outcome of suprascapular nerve block and hydrodistension in the treatment of frozen shoulder\",\"authors\":\"Suyash Singhania, Pravin Bande, Rajiv V. Kulkarni, Sagar Wajekar, Tejal Kothmire, M. Singh\",\"doi\":\"10.37515/ortho.8231.4305\",\"DOIUrl\":null,\"url\":null,\"abstract\":\"Background: Frozen shoulder or adhesive capsulitis (AC) is a common musculoskeletal disease which imposes significant morbidity and affects the quality of life. The present study was done to compare the effectiveness of the suprascapular nerve block (SSNB) under ultrasound guidance and hydrodistension in the management of AC. Materials and Methods: This prospective randomized control study was conducted in 60 patients visiting the Department of Orthopaedic Surgery, BARC Hospital, Mumbai, with AC not improving with physiotherapy. Patients were divided into Group A (n = 30) who received SSNB under ultrasound guidance in addition to physiotherapy and Group B (n = 30) who underwent hydrodistension of shoulder in addition to physiotherapy. Values for the ROM, Quick DASH score, and visual analog scale (VAS) score were obtained for each patient at the baseline and at 4, 8, and 12 weeks. Results: Female preponderance was observed in both the groups and overall 22% werediabetics. The difference in improvement in flexion, abduction, external rotation, and internal rotation from baseline to 12 weeks, 4 to 8 weeks, 4 to 12 weeks, and 8 to 12 weeks was higher in hydrodistension group as compared to SSNB group (p < 0.05). The decrease in the VAS and Quick DASH scores from baseline to 12 weeks was higher in hydrodistension group as compared to SSNB group (p < 0.05). Conclusion: Both SSNB and hydrodistension are useful in the management of AC. However, hydrodistension displayed better outcome as compared to SSNB in improving the functional outcome of patients.\",\"PeriodicalId\":252930,\"journal\":{\"name\":\"Hong Kong Journal of Orthopaedic Research\",\"volume\":\"215 1\",\"pages\":\"0\"},\"PeriodicalIF\":0.0000,\"publicationDate\":\"2021-12-30\",\"publicationTypes\":\"Journal Article\",\"fieldsOfStudy\":null,\"isOpenAccess\":false,\"openAccessPdf\":\"\",\"citationCount\":\"0\",\"resultStr\":null,\"platform\":\"Semanticscholar\",\"paperid\":null,\"PeriodicalName\":\"Hong Kong Journal of Orthopaedic Research\",\"FirstCategoryId\":\"1085\",\"ListUrlMain\":\"https://doi.org/10.37515/ortho.8231.4305\",\"RegionNum\":0,\"RegionCategory\":null,\"ArticlePicture\":[],\"TitleCN\":null,\"AbstractTextCN\":null,\"PMCID\":null,\"EPubDate\":\"\",\"PubModel\":\"\",\"JCR\":\"\",\"JCRName\":\"\",\"Score\":null,\"Total\":0}","platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Hong Kong Journal of Orthopaedic Research","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.37515/ortho.8231.4305","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"","JCRName":"","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

摘要

背景:冻肩或粘连性囊炎(AC)是一种常见的肌肉骨骼疾病,发病率高,影响生活质量。本研究旨在比较超声引导下肩胛上神经阻滞(SSNB)和水扩术治疗AC的疗效。材料与方法:本前瞻性随机对照研究纳入60例在孟买BARC医院骨科就诊的AC未经物理治疗改善的患者。将患者分为A组(n = 30)和B组(n = 30), A组在超声引导下进行SSNB治疗,B组在物理治疗的基础上进行肩关节水肿治疗。分别在基线、4周、8周和12周获得每位患者的ROM、Quick DASH评分和视觉模拟评分(VAS)。结果:在两组中均观察到女性优势,总体22%为糖尿病患者。从基线到12周、4至8周、4至12周和8至12周,水膨胀组屈曲、外展、外旋和内旋改善的差异高于SSNB组(p < 0.05)。从基线到12周,水扩组VAS和Quick DASH评分的下降幅度高于SSNB组(p < 0.05)。结论:SSNB和水扩术在AC的治疗中都是有用的。然而,与SSNB相比,水扩术在改善患者的功能结局方面表现出更好的结果。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
Randomized control study comparing the functional outcome of suprascapular nerve block and hydrodistension in the treatment of frozen shoulder
Background: Frozen shoulder or adhesive capsulitis (AC) is a common musculoskeletal disease which imposes significant morbidity and affects the quality of life. The present study was done to compare the effectiveness of the suprascapular nerve block (SSNB) under ultrasound guidance and hydrodistension in the management of AC. Materials and Methods: This prospective randomized control study was conducted in 60 patients visiting the Department of Orthopaedic Surgery, BARC Hospital, Mumbai, with AC not improving with physiotherapy. Patients were divided into Group A (n = 30) who received SSNB under ultrasound guidance in addition to physiotherapy and Group B (n = 30) who underwent hydrodistension of shoulder in addition to physiotherapy. Values for the ROM, Quick DASH score, and visual analog scale (VAS) score were obtained for each patient at the baseline and at 4, 8, and 12 weeks. Results: Female preponderance was observed in both the groups and overall 22% werediabetics. The difference in improvement in flexion, abduction, external rotation, and internal rotation from baseline to 12 weeks, 4 to 8 weeks, 4 to 12 weeks, and 8 to 12 weeks was higher in hydrodistension group as compared to SSNB group (p < 0.05). The decrease in the VAS and Quick DASH scores from baseline to 12 weeks was higher in hydrodistension group as compared to SSNB group (p < 0.05). Conclusion: Both SSNB and hydrodistension are useful in the management of AC. However, hydrodistension displayed better outcome as compared to SSNB in improving the functional outcome of patients.
求助全文
通过发布文献求助,成功后即可免费获取论文全文。 去求助
来源期刊
自引率
0.00%
发文量
0
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:604180095
Book学术官方微信