C. Knoess, R. Boellaard, M. Lenox, S. Vollmar, M. Casey, G. Fluegge, A. Lammertsma, K. Wienhard, W. Heiss
{"title":"高分辨率研究层析成像仪(HRRT)相互作用深度(DOI)的评价——带和不带DOI的扫描仪之间的比较","authors":"C. Knoess, R. Boellaard, M. Lenox, S. Vollmar, M. Casey, G. Fluegge, A. Lammertsma, K. Wienhard, W. Heiss","doi":"10.1109/NSSMIC.2002.1239593","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"The High Resolution Research Tomograph (HRRT) is the first clinical LSO scanner with depth of interaction (DOI) capability. At the moment two HRRT's exist: one is located at the Max-Planck-Institute in Cologne and is equipped with two 7.5 mm thick crystal layers and DOI (HRRT-D); the second HRRT is located at the VUme in Amsterdam with a single crystal layer (HRRT-S). This constellation allows evaluation of scanner characteristics with and without DOI. The effects of DOI on resolution, sensitivity, scatter fraction (SF) and noise equivalent count (NEC) rates were studied. These characteristics were measured according to the NEMA NU2-1994 or 2001 standards. Emission scans were acquired in 64 bit list mode. For HRRT-D emission data were sorted into files with coincidences between the layers nearest to the center of the scanner only and into files with all layer combinations providing DOI. Resolution data were analyzed with different data compressions (span 3 and 9) and for FORE+2D-HOSP and 3D-OSEM. Different scatter fractions between both scanners were observed for lower level discriminator values (lids) of higher energy. NEC rates were about 3 times higher for HRRT-D. Best resolution values of 2.0 mm FWHM at 0 cm radial offset from the center and 2.5 mm FWHM at 10 cm radial offset were found using span 3 and 3D-OSEM for HRRT-S. Equal values were found for HRRT-D using DOI. For span 9 data and FORE+2D-HOSP the axial resolution decreased at off center locations to 4 mm FWHM or more. The higher NECR of HRRT-D compared with HRRT-S is explained by the higher sensitivity, obtained with the additional crystal layer. Differences in scatter fractions might be explained by the difference in crystal energy spectra of both scanners. Comparison of resolution data of both scanners showed that high spatial resolution was preserved with DOI.","PeriodicalId":385259,"journal":{"name":"2002 IEEE Nuclear Science Symposium Conference Record","volume":"57 1","pages":"0"},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"2002-12-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"16","resultStr":"{\"title\":\"Evaluation of the depth of interaction (DOI) for the High Resolution Research Tomograph (HRRT) - a comparison between scanners with and without DOI\",\"authors\":\"C. Knoess, R. Boellaard, M. Lenox, S. Vollmar, M. Casey, G. Fluegge, A. Lammertsma, K. Wienhard, W. Heiss\",\"doi\":\"10.1109/NSSMIC.2002.1239593\",\"DOIUrl\":null,\"url\":null,\"abstract\":\"The High Resolution Research Tomograph (HRRT) is the first clinical LSO scanner with depth of interaction (DOI) capability. At the moment two HRRT's exist: one is located at the Max-Planck-Institute in Cologne and is equipped with two 7.5 mm thick crystal layers and DOI (HRRT-D); the second HRRT is located at the VUme in Amsterdam with a single crystal layer (HRRT-S). This constellation allows evaluation of scanner characteristics with and without DOI. The effects of DOI on resolution, sensitivity, scatter fraction (SF) and noise equivalent count (NEC) rates were studied. These characteristics were measured according to the NEMA NU2-1994 or 2001 standards. Emission scans were acquired in 64 bit list mode. For HRRT-D emission data were sorted into files with coincidences between the layers nearest to the center of the scanner only and into files with all layer combinations providing DOI. Resolution data were analyzed with different data compressions (span 3 and 9) and for FORE+2D-HOSP and 3D-OSEM. Different scatter fractions between both scanners were observed for lower level discriminator values (lids) of higher energy. NEC rates were about 3 times higher for HRRT-D. Best resolution values of 2.0 mm FWHM at 0 cm radial offset from the center and 2.5 mm FWHM at 10 cm radial offset were found using span 3 and 3D-OSEM for HRRT-S. Equal values were found for HRRT-D using DOI. For span 9 data and FORE+2D-HOSP the axial resolution decreased at off center locations to 4 mm FWHM or more. The higher NECR of HRRT-D compared with HRRT-S is explained by the higher sensitivity, obtained with the additional crystal layer. Differences in scatter fractions might be explained by the difference in crystal energy spectra of both scanners. Comparison of resolution data of both scanners showed that high spatial resolution was preserved with DOI.\",\"PeriodicalId\":385259,\"journal\":{\"name\":\"2002 IEEE Nuclear Science Symposium Conference Record\",\"volume\":\"57 1\",\"pages\":\"0\"},\"PeriodicalIF\":0.0000,\"publicationDate\":\"2002-12-01\",\"publicationTypes\":\"Journal Article\",\"fieldsOfStudy\":null,\"isOpenAccess\":false,\"openAccessPdf\":\"\",\"citationCount\":\"16\",\"resultStr\":null,\"platform\":\"Semanticscholar\",\"paperid\":null,\"PeriodicalName\":\"2002 IEEE Nuclear Science Symposium Conference Record\",\"FirstCategoryId\":\"1085\",\"ListUrlMain\":\"https://doi.org/10.1109/NSSMIC.2002.1239593\",\"RegionNum\":0,\"RegionCategory\":null,\"ArticlePicture\":[],\"TitleCN\":null,\"AbstractTextCN\":null,\"PMCID\":null,\"EPubDate\":\"\",\"PubModel\":\"\",\"JCR\":\"\",\"JCRName\":\"\",\"Score\":null,\"Total\":0}","platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"2002 IEEE Nuclear Science Symposium Conference Record","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1109/NSSMIC.2002.1239593","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"","JCRName":"","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 16
摘要
高分辨率研究层析成像仪(HRRT)是第一个具有相互作用深度(DOI)能力的临床LSO扫描仪。目前存在两个HRRT:一个位于科隆的马克斯普朗克研究所,配备两个7.5毫米厚的晶体层和DOI (HRRT- d);第二个HRRT位于阿姆斯特丹的VUme,具有单晶层(HRRT- s)。这个星座允许有和没有DOI的扫描仪特性的评估。研究了DOI对分辨率、灵敏度、散射分数(SF)和噪声等效计数(NEC)率的影响。这些特性是根据NEMA NU2-1994或2001标准测量的。发射扫描是在64位列表模式下获得的。对于HRRT-D发射数据,仅将最靠近扫描仪中心的层之间的重合文件分类,并将所有层组合提供DOI的文件分类。对不同数据压缩(跨度3和9)以及FORE+2D-HOSP和3D-OSEM的分辨率数据进行分析。对于较低能级的鉴别器值(盖子),两种扫描仪之间的散射分数不同。HRRT-D组的NEC发生率约为HRRT-D组的3倍。利用span 3和3D-OSEM, HRRT-S的最佳分辨率值为距离中心0 cm径向偏移处2.0 mm FWHM和距离中心10 cm径向偏移处2.5 mm FWHM。使用DOI, HRRT-D的值相等。对于跨度9和FORE+2D-HOSP数据,轴向分辨率在偏离中心位置下降到4mm FWHM或更高。与HRRT-S相比,HRRT-D的NECR更高,这是由于额外的晶体层获得了更高的灵敏度。散射分数的差异可以用两种扫描仪的晶体能谱的差异来解释。两种扫描器的分辨率数据对比表明,在DOI下保持了较高的空间分辨率。
Evaluation of the depth of interaction (DOI) for the High Resolution Research Tomograph (HRRT) - a comparison between scanners with and without DOI
The High Resolution Research Tomograph (HRRT) is the first clinical LSO scanner with depth of interaction (DOI) capability. At the moment two HRRT's exist: one is located at the Max-Planck-Institute in Cologne and is equipped with two 7.5 mm thick crystal layers and DOI (HRRT-D); the second HRRT is located at the VUme in Amsterdam with a single crystal layer (HRRT-S). This constellation allows evaluation of scanner characteristics with and without DOI. The effects of DOI on resolution, sensitivity, scatter fraction (SF) and noise equivalent count (NEC) rates were studied. These characteristics were measured according to the NEMA NU2-1994 or 2001 standards. Emission scans were acquired in 64 bit list mode. For HRRT-D emission data were sorted into files with coincidences between the layers nearest to the center of the scanner only and into files with all layer combinations providing DOI. Resolution data were analyzed with different data compressions (span 3 and 9) and for FORE+2D-HOSP and 3D-OSEM. Different scatter fractions between both scanners were observed for lower level discriminator values (lids) of higher energy. NEC rates were about 3 times higher for HRRT-D. Best resolution values of 2.0 mm FWHM at 0 cm radial offset from the center and 2.5 mm FWHM at 10 cm radial offset were found using span 3 and 3D-OSEM for HRRT-S. Equal values were found for HRRT-D using DOI. For span 9 data and FORE+2D-HOSP the axial resolution decreased at off center locations to 4 mm FWHM or more. The higher NECR of HRRT-D compared with HRRT-S is explained by the higher sensitivity, obtained with the additional crystal layer. Differences in scatter fractions might be explained by the difference in crystal energy spectra of both scanners. Comparison of resolution data of both scanners showed that high spatial resolution was preserved with DOI.