基于仿真的真实驾驶员行为反事实因果发现

Rhys Howard, L. Kunze
{"title":"基于仿真的真实驾驶员行为反事实因果发现","authors":"Rhys Howard, L. Kunze","doi":"10.1109/IV55152.2023.10186705","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"Being able to reason about how one’s behaviour can affect the behaviour of others is a core skill required of intelligent driving agents. Despite this, the state of the art struggles to meet the need of agents to discover causal links between themselves and others. Observational approaches struggle because of the non-stationarity of causal links in dynamic environments, and the sparsity of causal interactions while requiring the approaches to work in an online fashion. Meanwhile interventional approaches are impractical as a vehicle cannot experiment with its actions on a public road. To counter the issue of non-stationarity we reformulate the problem in terms of extracted events, while the previously mentioned restriction upon interventions can be overcome with the use of counterfactual simulation. We present three variants of the proposed counterfactual causal discovery method and evaluate these against state of the art observational temporal causal discovery methods across 3396 causal scenes extracted from a real world driving dataset. We find that the proposed method significantly outperforms the state of the art on the proposed task quantitatively and can offer additional insights by comparing the outcome of an alternate series of decisions in a way that observational and interventional approaches cannot.","PeriodicalId":195148,"journal":{"name":"2023 IEEE Intelligent Vehicles Symposium (IV)","volume":"46 1","pages":"0"},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"2023-06-04","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":"{\"title\":\"Simulation-Based Counterfactual Causal Discovery on Real World Driver Behaviour\",\"authors\":\"Rhys Howard, L. Kunze\",\"doi\":\"10.1109/IV55152.2023.10186705\",\"DOIUrl\":null,\"url\":null,\"abstract\":\"Being able to reason about how one’s behaviour can affect the behaviour of others is a core skill required of intelligent driving agents. Despite this, the state of the art struggles to meet the need of agents to discover causal links between themselves and others. Observational approaches struggle because of the non-stationarity of causal links in dynamic environments, and the sparsity of causal interactions while requiring the approaches to work in an online fashion. Meanwhile interventional approaches are impractical as a vehicle cannot experiment with its actions on a public road. To counter the issue of non-stationarity we reformulate the problem in terms of extracted events, while the previously mentioned restriction upon interventions can be overcome with the use of counterfactual simulation. We present three variants of the proposed counterfactual causal discovery method and evaluate these against state of the art observational temporal causal discovery methods across 3396 causal scenes extracted from a real world driving dataset. We find that the proposed method significantly outperforms the state of the art on the proposed task quantitatively and can offer additional insights by comparing the outcome of an alternate series of decisions in a way that observational and interventional approaches cannot.\",\"PeriodicalId\":195148,\"journal\":{\"name\":\"2023 IEEE Intelligent Vehicles Symposium (IV)\",\"volume\":\"46 1\",\"pages\":\"0\"},\"PeriodicalIF\":0.0000,\"publicationDate\":\"2023-06-04\",\"publicationTypes\":\"Journal Article\",\"fieldsOfStudy\":null,\"isOpenAccess\":false,\"openAccessPdf\":\"\",\"citationCount\":\"0\",\"resultStr\":null,\"platform\":\"Semanticscholar\",\"paperid\":null,\"PeriodicalName\":\"2023 IEEE Intelligent Vehicles Symposium (IV)\",\"FirstCategoryId\":\"1085\",\"ListUrlMain\":\"https://doi.org/10.1109/IV55152.2023.10186705\",\"RegionNum\":0,\"RegionCategory\":null,\"ArticlePicture\":[],\"TitleCN\":null,\"AbstractTextCN\":null,\"PMCID\":null,\"EPubDate\":\"\",\"PubModel\":\"\",\"JCR\":\"\",\"JCRName\":\"\",\"Score\":null,\"Total\":0}","platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"2023 IEEE Intelligent Vehicles Symposium (IV)","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1109/IV55152.2023.10186705","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"","JCRName":"","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

摘要

能够推理出一个人的行为如何影响他人的行为是智能驾驶代理所需要的核心技能。尽管如此,目前的技术仍在努力满足智能体发现自身与他人之间因果关系的需求。由于动态环境中因果关系的非平稳性,以及因果相互作用的稀疏性,观察方法很难在在线方式下工作。同时,由于车辆无法在公共道路上试验其行为,因此干预方法是不切实际的。为了解决非平稳性问题,我们根据提取的事件重新制定问题,而前面提到的干预限制可以通过使用反事实模拟来克服。我们提出了所提出的反事实因果发现方法的三种变体,并对从真实世界驾驶数据集中提取的3396个因果场景的最先进的观测时间因果发现方法进行了评估。我们发现,所提出的方法在定量上明显优于所提出任务的最新技术,并且可以通过比较一系列替代决策的结果来提供额外的见解,这是观察和干预方法无法做到的。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
Simulation-Based Counterfactual Causal Discovery on Real World Driver Behaviour
Being able to reason about how one’s behaviour can affect the behaviour of others is a core skill required of intelligent driving agents. Despite this, the state of the art struggles to meet the need of agents to discover causal links between themselves and others. Observational approaches struggle because of the non-stationarity of causal links in dynamic environments, and the sparsity of causal interactions while requiring the approaches to work in an online fashion. Meanwhile interventional approaches are impractical as a vehicle cannot experiment with its actions on a public road. To counter the issue of non-stationarity we reformulate the problem in terms of extracted events, while the previously mentioned restriction upon interventions can be overcome with the use of counterfactual simulation. We present three variants of the proposed counterfactual causal discovery method and evaluate these against state of the art observational temporal causal discovery methods across 3396 causal scenes extracted from a real world driving dataset. We find that the proposed method significantly outperforms the state of the art on the proposed task quantitatively and can offer additional insights by comparing the outcome of an alternate series of decisions in a way that observational and interventional approaches cannot.
求助全文
通过发布文献求助,成功后即可免费获取论文全文。 去求助
来源期刊
自引率
0.00%
发文量
0
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:604180095
Book学术官方微信