优先考虑电池管理系统功能以降低风险

S. Purushothaman
{"title":"优先考虑电池管理系统功能以降低风险","authors":"S. Purushothaman","doi":"10.1109/IAS.2019.8911964","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"This paper provides the results of a study undertaken to better understand the Battery Management System (BMS) architectures and develop a minimum set of BMS safety functionalities to minimize the loss exposure in large energy storage systems (ESSs). A scenario-based FMEA (failure modes and effects analysis) was utilized in this study. Various failure scenarios were evaluated based on functions to be performed by the BMS. The failure scenario propagation is described in stages. Each stage could have multiple BMS functions (operational and safety) active. As the failure initiates and propagates, the scenario progresses to the next stage, eventually resulting in the outcome. The criticality of each BMS safety function was calculated by ranking the function based on the stage in which it was activated in each scenario. The ranking process was repeated for all scenarios and the overall rank was determined by the sum of ranks across all scenarios. It was found that the BMS function responsible for preparing the system for fire suppression (e.g., close all openings and seal vents) when fire is detected is the most critical. The second most critical function was found to be a complete system trip when a cell is detected to have entered a thermal runaway condition. The other safety functions in order of priority are pack switch fail-to-trip, inverter/charger fail-to-trip and cell temperature isolating trip functions. A distributed architecture has been found to be more suitable for large multi-cell applications like utility based ESSs.","PeriodicalId":376719,"journal":{"name":"2019 IEEE Industry Applications Society Annual Meeting","volume":"26 1","pages":"0"},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"2019-09-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"1","resultStr":"{\"title\":\"Prioritizing Battery Management System Functionalities for Risk Mitigation\",\"authors\":\"S. Purushothaman\",\"doi\":\"10.1109/IAS.2019.8911964\",\"DOIUrl\":null,\"url\":null,\"abstract\":\"This paper provides the results of a study undertaken to better understand the Battery Management System (BMS) architectures and develop a minimum set of BMS safety functionalities to minimize the loss exposure in large energy storage systems (ESSs). A scenario-based FMEA (failure modes and effects analysis) was utilized in this study. Various failure scenarios were evaluated based on functions to be performed by the BMS. The failure scenario propagation is described in stages. Each stage could have multiple BMS functions (operational and safety) active. As the failure initiates and propagates, the scenario progresses to the next stage, eventually resulting in the outcome. The criticality of each BMS safety function was calculated by ranking the function based on the stage in which it was activated in each scenario. The ranking process was repeated for all scenarios and the overall rank was determined by the sum of ranks across all scenarios. It was found that the BMS function responsible for preparing the system for fire suppression (e.g., close all openings and seal vents) when fire is detected is the most critical. The second most critical function was found to be a complete system trip when a cell is detected to have entered a thermal runaway condition. The other safety functions in order of priority are pack switch fail-to-trip, inverter/charger fail-to-trip and cell temperature isolating trip functions. A distributed architecture has been found to be more suitable for large multi-cell applications like utility based ESSs.\",\"PeriodicalId\":376719,\"journal\":{\"name\":\"2019 IEEE Industry Applications Society Annual Meeting\",\"volume\":\"26 1\",\"pages\":\"0\"},\"PeriodicalIF\":0.0000,\"publicationDate\":\"2019-09-01\",\"publicationTypes\":\"Journal Article\",\"fieldsOfStudy\":null,\"isOpenAccess\":false,\"openAccessPdf\":\"\",\"citationCount\":\"1\",\"resultStr\":null,\"platform\":\"Semanticscholar\",\"paperid\":null,\"PeriodicalName\":\"2019 IEEE Industry Applications Society Annual Meeting\",\"FirstCategoryId\":\"1085\",\"ListUrlMain\":\"https://doi.org/10.1109/IAS.2019.8911964\",\"RegionNum\":0,\"RegionCategory\":null,\"ArticlePicture\":[],\"TitleCN\":null,\"AbstractTextCN\":null,\"PMCID\":null,\"EPubDate\":\"\",\"PubModel\":\"\",\"JCR\":\"\",\"JCRName\":\"\",\"Score\":null,\"Total\":0}","platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"2019 IEEE Industry Applications Society Annual Meeting","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1109/IAS.2019.8911964","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"","JCRName":"","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 1

摘要

本文提供了一项研究的结果,该研究旨在更好地理解电池管理系统(BMS)架构,并开发一套最小的BMS安全功能,以最大限度地减少大型储能系统(ess)中的损耗。本研究采用基于场景的失效模式和影响分析(FMEA)。根据BMS将要执行的功能对各种故障场景进行评估。故障场景传播是分阶段描述的。每个阶段都可以激活多个BMS功能(操作和安全)。随着故障的启动和传播,场景进展到下一个阶段,最终产生结果。每个BMS安全功能的临界程度是根据其在每个场景中激活的阶段对功能进行排序来计算的。对所有场景重复排名过程,总体排名由所有场景的排名总和决定。研究发现,当发现火灾时,负责准备灭火系统的BMS功能(例如,关闭所有开口和密封通风口)是最关键的。第二个最关键的功能是当检测到电池进入热失控状态时,系统完全脱扣。其他安全功能按优先顺序依次是分组开关故障跳闸,逆变器/充电器故障跳闸和电池温度隔离跳闸功能。人们发现分布式架构更适合大型多单元应用程序,比如基于实用程序的ess。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
Prioritizing Battery Management System Functionalities for Risk Mitigation
This paper provides the results of a study undertaken to better understand the Battery Management System (BMS) architectures and develop a minimum set of BMS safety functionalities to minimize the loss exposure in large energy storage systems (ESSs). A scenario-based FMEA (failure modes and effects analysis) was utilized in this study. Various failure scenarios were evaluated based on functions to be performed by the BMS. The failure scenario propagation is described in stages. Each stage could have multiple BMS functions (operational and safety) active. As the failure initiates and propagates, the scenario progresses to the next stage, eventually resulting in the outcome. The criticality of each BMS safety function was calculated by ranking the function based on the stage in which it was activated in each scenario. The ranking process was repeated for all scenarios and the overall rank was determined by the sum of ranks across all scenarios. It was found that the BMS function responsible for preparing the system for fire suppression (e.g., close all openings and seal vents) when fire is detected is the most critical. The second most critical function was found to be a complete system trip when a cell is detected to have entered a thermal runaway condition. The other safety functions in order of priority are pack switch fail-to-trip, inverter/charger fail-to-trip and cell temperature isolating trip functions. A distributed architecture has been found to be more suitable for large multi-cell applications like utility based ESSs.
求助全文
通过发布文献求助,成功后即可免费获取论文全文。 去求助
来源期刊
自引率
0.00%
发文量
0
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:604180095
Book学术官方微信