{"title":"«记忆战争»:隐喻与概念之间","authors":"O. Golovashina","doi":"10.15826/tetm.2021.1.006","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"The article is devoted to the study of the semantic field of \"memory wars\", identification of prerequisites and models of conceptualization of this concept, substantiation of the possibility of using the metaphor \"memorial wars\" as a concept. The theoretical and methodological basis of the research involves reference to the works of M. Foucault, R. Kozellek, M. Halbwachs, as well as to cognitive theories of metaphors (D. Lakoff, M. Johnson, A. P. Chudinov). Analysis of existing models for studying the history of concepts, analysis of specific social and discursive factors allowed us to trace the conceptualization of \"memory wars\" and to state the appearance of the corresponding scientific category, but additional theoretical work is needed to distinguish related concepts, as well as a clearer distinction between the metaphor \"memory wars\" and the corresponding scientific category.","PeriodicalId":269039,"journal":{"name":"Tempus et Memoria","volume":"34 1","pages":"0"},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"1900-01-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"2","resultStr":"{\"title\":\"«Memory Wars»: between Metaphor and Concept\",\"authors\":\"O. Golovashina\",\"doi\":\"10.15826/tetm.2021.1.006\",\"DOIUrl\":null,\"url\":null,\"abstract\":\"The article is devoted to the study of the semantic field of \\\"memory wars\\\", identification of prerequisites and models of conceptualization of this concept, substantiation of the possibility of using the metaphor \\\"memorial wars\\\" as a concept. The theoretical and methodological basis of the research involves reference to the works of M. Foucault, R. Kozellek, M. Halbwachs, as well as to cognitive theories of metaphors (D. Lakoff, M. Johnson, A. P. Chudinov). Analysis of existing models for studying the history of concepts, analysis of specific social and discursive factors allowed us to trace the conceptualization of \\\"memory wars\\\" and to state the appearance of the corresponding scientific category, but additional theoretical work is needed to distinguish related concepts, as well as a clearer distinction between the metaphor \\\"memory wars\\\" and the corresponding scientific category.\",\"PeriodicalId\":269039,\"journal\":{\"name\":\"Tempus et Memoria\",\"volume\":\"34 1\",\"pages\":\"0\"},\"PeriodicalIF\":0.0000,\"publicationDate\":\"1900-01-01\",\"publicationTypes\":\"Journal Article\",\"fieldsOfStudy\":null,\"isOpenAccess\":false,\"openAccessPdf\":\"\",\"citationCount\":\"2\",\"resultStr\":null,\"platform\":\"Semanticscholar\",\"paperid\":null,\"PeriodicalName\":\"Tempus et Memoria\",\"FirstCategoryId\":\"1085\",\"ListUrlMain\":\"https://doi.org/10.15826/tetm.2021.1.006\",\"RegionNum\":0,\"RegionCategory\":null,\"ArticlePicture\":[],\"TitleCN\":null,\"AbstractTextCN\":null,\"PMCID\":null,\"EPubDate\":\"\",\"PubModel\":\"\",\"JCR\":\"\",\"JCRName\":\"\",\"Score\":null,\"Total\":0}","platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Tempus et Memoria","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.15826/tetm.2021.1.006","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"","JCRName":"","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 2
摘要
本文研究了“记忆战争”的语义场,确定了“记忆战争”概念化的前提和模式,论证了“记忆战争”隐喻作为概念的可能性。该研究的理论和方法基础包括参考M.福柯、R. Kozellek、M. Halbwachs的著作,以及隐喻的认知理论(D. Lakoff、M. Johnson、A. P. Chudinov)。分析现有的概念史研究模型,分析具体的社会和话语因素,使我们能够追溯“记忆战争”的概念化,并陈述相应的科学范畴的出现,但需要额外的理论工作来区分相关的概念,以及更清晰地区分隐喻“记忆战争”和相应的科学范畴。
The article is devoted to the study of the semantic field of "memory wars", identification of prerequisites and models of conceptualization of this concept, substantiation of the possibility of using the metaphor "memorial wars" as a concept. The theoretical and methodological basis of the research involves reference to the works of M. Foucault, R. Kozellek, M. Halbwachs, as well as to cognitive theories of metaphors (D. Lakoff, M. Johnson, A. P. Chudinov). Analysis of existing models for studying the history of concepts, analysis of specific social and discursive factors allowed us to trace the conceptualization of "memory wars" and to state the appearance of the corresponding scientific category, but additional theoretical work is needed to distinguish related concepts, as well as a clearer distinction between the metaphor "memory wars" and the corresponding scientific category.