«记忆战争»:隐喻与概念之间

O. Golovashina
{"title":"«记忆战争»:隐喻与概念之间","authors":"O. Golovashina","doi":"10.15826/tetm.2021.1.006","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"The article is devoted to the study of the semantic field of \"memory wars\", identification of prerequisites and models of conceptualization of this concept, substantiation of the possibility of using the metaphor \"memorial wars\" as a concept. The theoretical and methodological basis of the research involves reference to the works of M. Foucault, R. Kozellek, M. Halbwachs, as well as to cognitive theories of metaphors (D. Lakoff, M. Johnson, A. P. Chudinov). Analysis of existing models for studying the history of concepts, analysis of specific social and discursive factors allowed us to trace the conceptualization of \"memory wars\" and to state the appearance of the corresponding scientific category, but additional theoretical work is needed to distinguish related concepts, as well as a clearer distinction between the metaphor \"memory wars\" and the corresponding scientific category.","PeriodicalId":269039,"journal":{"name":"Tempus et Memoria","volume":"34 1","pages":"0"},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"1900-01-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"2","resultStr":"{\"title\":\"«Memory Wars»: between Metaphor and Concept\",\"authors\":\"O. Golovashina\",\"doi\":\"10.15826/tetm.2021.1.006\",\"DOIUrl\":null,\"url\":null,\"abstract\":\"The article is devoted to the study of the semantic field of \\\"memory wars\\\", identification of prerequisites and models of conceptualization of this concept, substantiation of the possibility of using the metaphor \\\"memorial wars\\\" as a concept. The theoretical and methodological basis of the research involves reference to the works of M. Foucault, R. Kozellek, M. Halbwachs, as well as to cognitive theories of metaphors (D. Lakoff, M. Johnson, A. P. Chudinov). Analysis of existing models for studying the history of concepts, analysis of specific social and discursive factors allowed us to trace the conceptualization of \\\"memory wars\\\" and to state the appearance of the corresponding scientific category, but additional theoretical work is needed to distinguish related concepts, as well as a clearer distinction between the metaphor \\\"memory wars\\\" and the corresponding scientific category.\",\"PeriodicalId\":269039,\"journal\":{\"name\":\"Tempus et Memoria\",\"volume\":\"34 1\",\"pages\":\"0\"},\"PeriodicalIF\":0.0000,\"publicationDate\":\"1900-01-01\",\"publicationTypes\":\"Journal Article\",\"fieldsOfStudy\":null,\"isOpenAccess\":false,\"openAccessPdf\":\"\",\"citationCount\":\"2\",\"resultStr\":null,\"platform\":\"Semanticscholar\",\"paperid\":null,\"PeriodicalName\":\"Tempus et Memoria\",\"FirstCategoryId\":\"1085\",\"ListUrlMain\":\"https://doi.org/10.15826/tetm.2021.1.006\",\"RegionNum\":0,\"RegionCategory\":null,\"ArticlePicture\":[],\"TitleCN\":null,\"AbstractTextCN\":null,\"PMCID\":null,\"EPubDate\":\"\",\"PubModel\":\"\",\"JCR\":\"\",\"JCRName\":\"\",\"Score\":null,\"Total\":0}","platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Tempus et Memoria","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.15826/tetm.2021.1.006","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"","JCRName":"","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 2

摘要

本文研究了“记忆战争”的语义场,确定了“记忆战争”概念化的前提和模式,论证了“记忆战争”隐喻作为概念的可能性。该研究的理论和方法基础包括参考M.福柯、R. Kozellek、M. Halbwachs的著作,以及隐喻的认知理论(D. Lakoff、M. Johnson、A. P. Chudinov)。分析现有的概念史研究模型,分析具体的社会和话语因素,使我们能够追溯“记忆战争”的概念化,并陈述相应的科学范畴的出现,但需要额外的理论工作来区分相关的概念,以及更清晰地区分隐喻“记忆战争”和相应的科学范畴。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
«Memory Wars»: between Metaphor and Concept
The article is devoted to the study of the semantic field of "memory wars", identification of prerequisites and models of conceptualization of this concept, substantiation of the possibility of using the metaphor "memorial wars" as a concept. The theoretical and methodological basis of the research involves reference to the works of M. Foucault, R. Kozellek, M. Halbwachs, as well as to cognitive theories of metaphors (D. Lakoff, M. Johnson, A. P. Chudinov). Analysis of existing models for studying the history of concepts, analysis of specific social and discursive factors allowed us to trace the conceptualization of "memory wars" and to state the appearance of the corresponding scientific category, but additional theoretical work is needed to distinguish related concepts, as well as a clearer distinction between the metaphor "memory wars" and the corresponding scientific category.
求助全文
通过发布文献求助,成功后即可免费获取论文全文。 去求助
来源期刊
自引率
0.00%
发文量
0
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术官方微信