Oliver Hahn, Steffen Lemke, Athanasios Mazarakis, Isabella Peters
{"title":"哪些视觉元素使文本显得科学?实证分析","authors":"Oliver Hahn, Steffen Lemke, Athanasios Mazarakis, Isabella Peters","doi":"10.1145/3404983.3410014","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"Finding the articles relevant to a problem requires readers to assess texts prior to profound reading. Such an assessment of potential relevance can be based on meta-information. For example, a scientific article's visual elements and layout might make it distinguishable from pseudo- or unscientific texts. In order to investigate which visual properties let a text appear scientific we conducted an experiment. Results indicate that mathematical formulas, diagrams or tables in a two-column layout generate a scientific impression. Properties that might not conform to typical scientific conventions, e.g., photos in combination with a one-column layout, are perceived as less scientific by the majority of respondents.","PeriodicalId":298769,"journal":{"name":"Proceedings of Mensch und Computer 2020","volume":"9 1","pages":"0"},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"2020-09-04","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"1","resultStr":"{\"title\":\"Which visual elements make texts appear scientific?: an empirical analysis\",\"authors\":\"Oliver Hahn, Steffen Lemke, Athanasios Mazarakis, Isabella Peters\",\"doi\":\"10.1145/3404983.3410014\",\"DOIUrl\":null,\"url\":null,\"abstract\":\"Finding the articles relevant to a problem requires readers to assess texts prior to profound reading. Such an assessment of potential relevance can be based on meta-information. For example, a scientific article's visual elements and layout might make it distinguishable from pseudo- or unscientific texts. In order to investigate which visual properties let a text appear scientific we conducted an experiment. Results indicate that mathematical formulas, diagrams or tables in a two-column layout generate a scientific impression. Properties that might not conform to typical scientific conventions, e.g., photos in combination with a one-column layout, are perceived as less scientific by the majority of respondents.\",\"PeriodicalId\":298769,\"journal\":{\"name\":\"Proceedings of Mensch und Computer 2020\",\"volume\":\"9 1\",\"pages\":\"0\"},\"PeriodicalIF\":0.0000,\"publicationDate\":\"2020-09-04\",\"publicationTypes\":\"Journal Article\",\"fieldsOfStudy\":null,\"isOpenAccess\":false,\"openAccessPdf\":\"\",\"citationCount\":\"1\",\"resultStr\":null,\"platform\":\"Semanticscholar\",\"paperid\":null,\"PeriodicalName\":\"Proceedings of Mensch und Computer 2020\",\"FirstCategoryId\":\"1085\",\"ListUrlMain\":\"https://doi.org/10.1145/3404983.3410014\",\"RegionNum\":0,\"RegionCategory\":null,\"ArticlePicture\":[],\"TitleCN\":null,\"AbstractTextCN\":null,\"PMCID\":null,\"EPubDate\":\"\",\"PubModel\":\"\",\"JCR\":\"\",\"JCRName\":\"\",\"Score\":null,\"Total\":0}","platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Proceedings of Mensch und Computer 2020","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1145/3404983.3410014","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"","JCRName":"","Score":null,"Total":0}
Which visual elements make texts appear scientific?: an empirical analysis
Finding the articles relevant to a problem requires readers to assess texts prior to profound reading. Such an assessment of potential relevance can be based on meta-information. For example, a scientific article's visual elements and layout might make it distinguishable from pseudo- or unscientific texts. In order to investigate which visual properties let a text appear scientific we conducted an experiment. Results indicate that mathematical formulas, diagrams or tables in a two-column layout generate a scientific impression. Properties that might not conform to typical scientific conventions, e.g., photos in combination with a one-column layout, are perceived as less scientific by the majority of respondents.