经典方法与土壤质量指标评价土壤质量。

I. Vasiliniuc
{"title":"经典方法与土壤质量指标评价土壤质量。","authors":"I. Vasiliniuc","doi":"10.15551/FPPZT.V13I1.507","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"The purpose of the paper has been of elaborating an index of soil quality,\n that would take into account only the intrinsic soil parameters, and reducing the complexity of the soil\n evaluation systems used at the moment. The purpose of such an index is to offer useful information,\n in short time and with reduced costs. A second aspect was that of comparing such an index with the classic\n method of terrain evaluation used in Romania, and see if there is any correlation among the two systems.\n The conclusions show that because of taking into consideration different parameters, the two methods have\n different areas of applicability. The classic method is recommended for terrain evaluation, while the soil\n quality index can be used as a quick tool to evaluate soil quality and the changes that might occur following\n different management practices.","PeriodicalId":202276,"journal":{"name":"Soil Forming Factors and Processes from the Temperate Zone","volume":"19 1","pages":"0"},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"1900-01-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":"{\"title\":\"Classic method vs. soil quality index in evaluating soil quality.\",\"authors\":\"I. Vasiliniuc\",\"doi\":\"10.15551/FPPZT.V13I1.507\",\"DOIUrl\":null,\"url\":null,\"abstract\":\"The purpose of the paper has been of elaborating an index of soil quality,\\n that would take into account only the intrinsic soil parameters, and reducing the complexity of the soil\\n evaluation systems used at the moment. The purpose of such an index is to offer useful information,\\n in short time and with reduced costs. A second aspect was that of comparing such an index with the classic\\n method of terrain evaluation used in Romania, and see if there is any correlation among the two systems.\\n The conclusions show that because of taking into consideration different parameters, the two methods have\\n different areas of applicability. The classic method is recommended for terrain evaluation, while the soil\\n quality index can be used as a quick tool to evaluate soil quality and the changes that might occur following\\n different management practices.\",\"PeriodicalId\":202276,\"journal\":{\"name\":\"Soil Forming Factors and Processes from the Temperate Zone\",\"volume\":\"19 1\",\"pages\":\"0\"},\"PeriodicalIF\":0.0000,\"publicationDate\":\"1900-01-01\",\"publicationTypes\":\"Journal Article\",\"fieldsOfStudy\":null,\"isOpenAccess\":false,\"openAccessPdf\":\"\",\"citationCount\":\"0\",\"resultStr\":null,\"platform\":\"Semanticscholar\",\"paperid\":null,\"PeriodicalName\":\"Soil Forming Factors and Processes from the Temperate Zone\",\"FirstCategoryId\":\"1085\",\"ListUrlMain\":\"https://doi.org/10.15551/FPPZT.V13I1.507\",\"RegionNum\":0,\"RegionCategory\":null,\"ArticlePicture\":[],\"TitleCN\":null,\"AbstractTextCN\":null,\"PMCID\":null,\"EPubDate\":\"\",\"PubModel\":\"\",\"JCR\":\"\",\"JCRName\":\"\",\"Score\":null,\"Total\":0}","platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Soil Forming Factors and Processes from the Temperate Zone","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.15551/FPPZT.V13I1.507","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"","JCRName":"","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

摘要

本文的目的是制定一个土壤质量指数,该指数将只考虑土壤的内在参数,并减少目前使用的土壤评价系统的复杂性。这种索引的目的是在短时间内以较低的成本提供有用的信息。第二个方面是将这种指数与罗马尼亚使用的经典地形评价方法进行比较,看看这两个系统之间是否有任何关联。结果表明,由于考虑的参数不同,两种方法的适用范围不同。建议采用经典方法进行地形评价,而土壤质量指数可以作为快速评价土壤质量和不同管理措施可能发生的变化的工具。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
Classic method vs. soil quality index in evaluating soil quality.
The purpose of the paper has been of elaborating an index of soil quality, that would take into account only the intrinsic soil parameters, and reducing the complexity of the soil evaluation systems used at the moment. The purpose of such an index is to offer useful information, in short time and with reduced costs. A second aspect was that of comparing such an index with the classic method of terrain evaluation used in Romania, and see if there is any correlation among the two systems. The conclusions show that because of taking into consideration different parameters, the two methods have different areas of applicability. The classic method is recommended for terrain evaluation, while the soil quality index can be used as a quick tool to evaluate soil quality and the changes that might occur following different management practices.
求助全文
通过发布文献求助,成功后即可免费获取论文全文。 去求助
来源期刊
自引率
0.00%
发文量
0
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:604180095
Book学术官方微信