{"title":"经典方法与土壤质量指标评价土壤质量。","authors":"I. Vasiliniuc","doi":"10.15551/FPPZT.V13I1.507","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"The purpose of the paper has been of elaborating an index of soil quality,\n that would take into account only the intrinsic soil parameters, and reducing the complexity of the soil\n evaluation systems used at the moment. The purpose of such an index is to offer useful information,\n in short time and with reduced costs. A second aspect was that of comparing such an index with the classic\n method of terrain evaluation used in Romania, and see if there is any correlation among the two systems.\n The conclusions show that because of taking into consideration different parameters, the two methods have\n different areas of applicability. The classic method is recommended for terrain evaluation, while the soil\n quality index can be used as a quick tool to evaluate soil quality and the changes that might occur following\n different management practices.","PeriodicalId":202276,"journal":{"name":"Soil Forming Factors and Processes from the Temperate Zone","volume":"19 1","pages":"0"},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"1900-01-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":"{\"title\":\"Classic method vs. soil quality index in evaluating soil quality.\",\"authors\":\"I. Vasiliniuc\",\"doi\":\"10.15551/FPPZT.V13I1.507\",\"DOIUrl\":null,\"url\":null,\"abstract\":\"The purpose of the paper has been of elaborating an index of soil quality,\\n that would take into account only the intrinsic soil parameters, and reducing the complexity of the soil\\n evaluation systems used at the moment. The purpose of such an index is to offer useful information,\\n in short time and with reduced costs. A second aspect was that of comparing such an index with the classic\\n method of terrain evaluation used in Romania, and see if there is any correlation among the two systems.\\n The conclusions show that because of taking into consideration different parameters, the two methods have\\n different areas of applicability. The classic method is recommended for terrain evaluation, while the soil\\n quality index can be used as a quick tool to evaluate soil quality and the changes that might occur following\\n different management practices.\",\"PeriodicalId\":202276,\"journal\":{\"name\":\"Soil Forming Factors and Processes from the Temperate Zone\",\"volume\":\"19 1\",\"pages\":\"0\"},\"PeriodicalIF\":0.0000,\"publicationDate\":\"1900-01-01\",\"publicationTypes\":\"Journal Article\",\"fieldsOfStudy\":null,\"isOpenAccess\":false,\"openAccessPdf\":\"\",\"citationCount\":\"0\",\"resultStr\":null,\"platform\":\"Semanticscholar\",\"paperid\":null,\"PeriodicalName\":\"Soil Forming Factors and Processes from the Temperate Zone\",\"FirstCategoryId\":\"1085\",\"ListUrlMain\":\"https://doi.org/10.15551/FPPZT.V13I1.507\",\"RegionNum\":0,\"RegionCategory\":null,\"ArticlePicture\":[],\"TitleCN\":null,\"AbstractTextCN\":null,\"PMCID\":null,\"EPubDate\":\"\",\"PubModel\":\"\",\"JCR\":\"\",\"JCRName\":\"\",\"Score\":null,\"Total\":0}","platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Soil Forming Factors and Processes from the Temperate Zone","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.15551/FPPZT.V13I1.507","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"","JCRName":"","Score":null,"Total":0}
Classic method vs. soil quality index in evaluating soil quality.
The purpose of the paper has been of elaborating an index of soil quality,
that would take into account only the intrinsic soil parameters, and reducing the complexity of the soil
evaluation systems used at the moment. The purpose of such an index is to offer useful information,
in short time and with reduced costs. A second aspect was that of comparing such an index with the classic
method of terrain evaluation used in Romania, and see if there is any correlation among the two systems.
The conclusions show that because of taking into consideration different parameters, the two methods have
different areas of applicability. The classic method is recommended for terrain evaluation, while the soil
quality index can be used as a quick tool to evaluate soil quality and the changes that might occur following
different management practices.