{"title":"Modelos sintarget","authors":"Alejandro Cassini","doi":"10.14201/ART201872185209","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"It is frequently acknowledged that some scientific models do not have a target. In that case, it is not clear how surrogative reasoning is possible. In this article I contend that every model has a target. I argue that targets should not be identified with selected phenomena or with selected portions or aspects of the real world. I intend to show that the target of any model is always the outcome of a complex process of construction, a process that cannot be accounted for solely by means of abstraction from the phenomena. I conclude that although all models have a fixed target, their domain of application may change or even be empty.","PeriodicalId":259984,"journal":{"name":"ArtefaCToS. Revista de estudios sobre la ciencia y la tecnología","volume":"15 4","pages":"0"},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"2018-10-30","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"2","resultStr":"{\"title\":\"Modelos sin target\",\"authors\":\"Alejandro Cassini\",\"doi\":\"10.14201/ART201872185209\",\"DOIUrl\":null,\"url\":null,\"abstract\":\"It is frequently acknowledged that some scientific models do not have a target. In that case, it is not clear how surrogative reasoning is possible. In this article I contend that every model has a target. I argue that targets should not be identified with selected phenomena or with selected portions or aspects of the real world. I intend to show that the target of any model is always the outcome of a complex process of construction, a process that cannot be accounted for solely by means of abstraction from the phenomena. I conclude that although all models have a fixed target, their domain of application may change or even be empty.\",\"PeriodicalId\":259984,\"journal\":{\"name\":\"ArtefaCToS. Revista de estudios sobre la ciencia y la tecnología\",\"volume\":\"15 4\",\"pages\":\"0\"},\"PeriodicalIF\":0.0000,\"publicationDate\":\"2018-10-30\",\"publicationTypes\":\"Journal Article\",\"fieldsOfStudy\":null,\"isOpenAccess\":false,\"openAccessPdf\":\"\",\"citationCount\":\"2\",\"resultStr\":null,\"platform\":\"Semanticscholar\",\"paperid\":null,\"PeriodicalName\":\"ArtefaCToS. Revista de estudios sobre la ciencia y la tecnología\",\"FirstCategoryId\":\"1085\",\"ListUrlMain\":\"https://doi.org/10.14201/ART201872185209\",\"RegionNum\":0,\"RegionCategory\":null,\"ArticlePicture\":[],\"TitleCN\":null,\"AbstractTextCN\":null,\"PMCID\":null,\"EPubDate\":\"\",\"PubModel\":\"\",\"JCR\":\"\",\"JCRName\":\"\",\"Score\":null,\"Total\":0}","platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"ArtefaCToS. Revista de estudios sobre la ciencia y la tecnología","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.14201/ART201872185209","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"","JCRName":"","Score":null,"Total":0}
It is frequently acknowledged that some scientific models do not have a target. In that case, it is not clear how surrogative reasoning is possible. In this article I contend that every model has a target. I argue that targets should not be identified with selected phenomena or with selected portions or aspects of the real world. I intend to show that the target of any model is always the outcome of a complex process of construction, a process that cannot be accounted for solely by means of abstraction from the phenomena. I conclude that although all models have a fixed target, their domain of application may change or even be empty.