LITERARY VIEW OF DISCOURSE ANALYSIS FROM THE STANDPOINT OF FRENCH POSTSTRUCTURALISM

When studying discourse from the point of view of literary criticism, taking into account semiotic, culturological and linguistic aspects, it is still necessary to try to distinguish the difference between the literary approach to discourse and the purely linguistic one, taking into account their inevitable interoperability. In this regard, the development of the analysis of discourse in France is significant, where the main body of ideas that influenced the idea of discursivity in a number of other countries, was formed. The convergence of the principles of poetics and discursivity studies emphasizes the prospect of an active appeal of literary thought to the ideas of discursology and the formation of directly literary strategies for the analysis of discourse. Of greater interest is the distinction between the potentials of the study of discourse by linguistics and literary criticism, to one degree or another, shown in the works of M. Pecheux, M. Foucault, J. Jeanette, P. Sériot, R. Robin, J. Kristeva. The positions of R. Barthes, A. J. Greimas and J. Fontanille, J. Guiehaumou and D. Maldidier were also taken into account. The perspective of the study carried out within the framework of this article focused on the wide analytical spectrum within the framework of literary discursology. The appropriateness of the approach to discursivity was understood, which not only touches on the aspects of the identification of the subject and the conceptual atmosphere of the cultural situation, but also interacts them in depth. The idea of M. Foucault became controversial, which made it possible to comprehend the ways of literary study of discourse. With this approach, the object of discourse is correlated with the dogmas of the cultural era, which determines the transformation of discourse in connection with key ideas, ideas and social norms. In this article was revealed The importance of the intertextual potential of discursivity and mutual conditionality by the context. The connection of discourse with the unconscious was also considered, allowing you to focus on the significance of subtext for analyzing discursivity in general and directly when understanding a specific object of discourse.