{"title":"一例罕见的11岁儿童口内穿透伤(铁棒)。","authors":"R. Yadav","doi":"10.36611/upjohns/volume10/issue1/10","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"INTRODUCTION\nMorbidity and mortality of penetrating neck trauma\nreported as 5-10% and 3-6% respectively. Massive\nhaemorrhage has been main cause of death\n.Selective management is a shift from traditional\nmandatory exploration which is based on physical\nexamination and selective diagnostic studies. We\nhereby present a case of penetrating zone II neck\ninjury by an iron rod in a11 year old boy due to\naccidental fall in under construction building.\nAIM AND OBJECTIVE\nTo highlight the rarity of the case and emphasize on\nthe complex nature of injury.\nMETHODOLOGY\n11 year old male child was referred to our medical\ncollege hospital with history of fall over iron rod in\nan under construction building. He was vitally\nstable on examination and around 45 cms iron rod\nwas seen penetrating through anterior tongue and\nfloor of mouth extending through the left\nsubmandibular gland externally. There was no\nbleeding or hematoma . Patient was subjected to\nSurgery and rod was removed under GA .There\nwas no post operative complications .On follow up\nupto 6 months patient was doing fine .\nCONCLUSION\nPenetrating neck injury is rare and anatomical\nknowledge of neck is of utmost importance so as to\nprevent undue complications and aggressive\nmanagement .Conventional packing of sinus tract\nis no longer recommended .Good clinical\ndiagnosis can rule out any sign of vascular injury and in that case angiography and CT could be\navoided without any major risk.","PeriodicalId":356722,"journal":{"name":"First Issue 2022","volume":"16 1","pages":"0"},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"2022-06-30","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":"{\"title\":\"A RARE CASE OF INTRAORAL PENETRATING INJURY\\n(IRON ROD) IN A 11 YEAR OLD CHILD.\",\"authors\":\"R. Yadav\",\"doi\":\"10.36611/upjohns/volume10/issue1/10\",\"DOIUrl\":null,\"url\":null,\"abstract\":\"INTRODUCTION\\nMorbidity and mortality of penetrating neck trauma\\nreported as 5-10% and 3-6% respectively. Massive\\nhaemorrhage has been main cause of death\\n.Selective management is a shift from traditional\\nmandatory exploration which is based on physical\\nexamination and selective diagnostic studies. We\\nhereby present a case of penetrating zone II neck\\ninjury by an iron rod in a11 year old boy due to\\naccidental fall in under construction building.\\nAIM AND OBJECTIVE\\nTo highlight the rarity of the case and emphasize on\\nthe complex nature of injury.\\nMETHODOLOGY\\n11 year old male child was referred to our medical\\ncollege hospital with history of fall over iron rod in\\nan under construction building. He was vitally\\nstable on examination and around 45 cms iron rod\\nwas seen penetrating through anterior tongue and\\nfloor of mouth extending through the left\\nsubmandibular gland externally. There was no\\nbleeding or hematoma . Patient was subjected to\\nSurgery and rod was removed under GA .There\\nwas no post operative complications .On follow up\\nupto 6 months patient was doing fine .\\nCONCLUSION\\nPenetrating neck injury is rare and anatomical\\nknowledge of neck is of utmost importance so as to\\nprevent undue complications and aggressive\\nmanagement .Conventional packing of sinus tract\\nis no longer recommended .Good clinical\\ndiagnosis can rule out any sign of vascular injury and in that case angiography and CT could be\\navoided without any major risk.\",\"PeriodicalId\":356722,\"journal\":{\"name\":\"First Issue 2022\",\"volume\":\"16 1\",\"pages\":\"0\"},\"PeriodicalIF\":0.0000,\"publicationDate\":\"2022-06-30\",\"publicationTypes\":\"Journal Article\",\"fieldsOfStudy\":null,\"isOpenAccess\":false,\"openAccessPdf\":\"\",\"citationCount\":\"0\",\"resultStr\":null,\"platform\":\"Semanticscholar\",\"paperid\":null,\"PeriodicalName\":\"First Issue 2022\",\"FirstCategoryId\":\"1085\",\"ListUrlMain\":\"https://doi.org/10.36611/upjohns/volume10/issue1/10\",\"RegionNum\":0,\"RegionCategory\":null,\"ArticlePicture\":[],\"TitleCN\":null,\"AbstractTextCN\":null,\"PMCID\":null,\"EPubDate\":\"\",\"PubModel\":\"\",\"JCR\":\"\",\"JCRName\":\"\",\"Score\":null,\"Total\":0}","platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"First Issue 2022","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.36611/upjohns/volume10/issue1/10","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"","JCRName":"","Score":null,"Total":0}
A RARE CASE OF INTRAORAL PENETRATING INJURY
(IRON ROD) IN A 11 YEAR OLD CHILD.
INTRODUCTION
Morbidity and mortality of penetrating neck trauma
reported as 5-10% and 3-6% respectively. Massive
haemorrhage has been main cause of death
.Selective management is a shift from traditional
mandatory exploration which is based on physical
examination and selective diagnostic studies. We
hereby present a case of penetrating zone II neck
injury by an iron rod in a11 year old boy due to
accidental fall in under construction building.
AIM AND OBJECTIVE
To highlight the rarity of the case and emphasize on
the complex nature of injury.
METHODOLOGY
11 year old male child was referred to our medical
college hospital with history of fall over iron rod in
an under construction building. He was vitally
stable on examination and around 45 cms iron rod
was seen penetrating through anterior tongue and
floor of mouth extending through the left
submandibular gland externally. There was no
bleeding or hematoma . Patient was subjected to
Surgery and rod was removed under GA .There
was no post operative complications .On follow up
upto 6 months patient was doing fine .
CONCLUSION
Penetrating neck injury is rare and anatomical
knowledge of neck is of utmost importance so as to
prevent undue complications and aggressive
management .Conventional packing of sinus tract
is no longer recommended .Good clinical
diagnosis can rule out any sign of vascular injury and in that case angiography and CT could be
avoided without any major risk.