{"title":"第二个信号系统是巴甫洛夫和他的弟子们设想的。","authors":"G Windholz","doi":"10.1007/BF02900699","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><p>Pavlov clearly formulated his ideas on the second signal system (specifically, language) in the 1930s. This occurred in conjunction with his interest in interspecies differences and in the study of human neuroses. Pavlov proposed that conditional reflexes signal concrete reality while symbolic-language provides abstractions of reality. Phylogenetically, language emerged in the humans because this form of communication had survival value to the species. Pavlov's disciples L. A. Orbeli and N. I. Krasnogorskiĭ had considered the ontogenetic development of language. The experimental investigation of A. G. Ivanov-Smolenskiĭ extended Pavlov's empirical study of the function of language in psychopathology. Notwithstanding a sustained interest in language, Pavlov did not develop a theory of language acquisition based upon the conditioning principle. Pavlov's conceptualization of language may not have been original, nor did it contribute significantly to modern linguistics. It is now mainly of historical interest. It was, nevertheless, important to the conceptualization of neuroses within the context of the theory of higher nervous activity and it had far-reaching political implications for Soviet psychology in the immediate post-World War II period.</p>","PeriodicalId":76714,"journal":{"name":"The Pavlovian journal of biological science","volume":"25 4","pages":"163-73"},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"1990-10-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"https://sci-hub-pdf.com/10.1007/BF02900699","citationCount":"9","resultStr":"{\"title\":\"The second signal system as conceived by Pavlov and his disciples.\",\"authors\":\"G Windholz\",\"doi\":\"10.1007/BF02900699\",\"DOIUrl\":null,\"url\":null,\"abstract\":\"<p><p>Pavlov clearly formulated his ideas on the second signal system (specifically, language) in the 1930s. This occurred in conjunction with his interest in interspecies differences and in the study of human neuroses. Pavlov proposed that conditional reflexes signal concrete reality while symbolic-language provides abstractions of reality. Phylogenetically, language emerged in the humans because this form of communication had survival value to the species. Pavlov's disciples L. A. Orbeli and N. I. Krasnogorskiĭ had considered the ontogenetic development of language. The experimental investigation of A. G. Ivanov-Smolenskiĭ extended Pavlov's empirical study of the function of language in psychopathology. Notwithstanding a sustained interest in language, Pavlov did not develop a theory of language acquisition based upon the conditioning principle. Pavlov's conceptualization of language may not have been original, nor did it contribute significantly to modern linguistics. It is now mainly of historical interest. It was, nevertheless, important to the conceptualization of neuroses within the context of the theory of higher nervous activity and it had far-reaching political implications for Soviet psychology in the immediate post-World War II period.</p>\",\"PeriodicalId\":76714,\"journal\":{\"name\":\"The Pavlovian journal of biological science\",\"volume\":\"25 4\",\"pages\":\"163-73\"},\"PeriodicalIF\":0.0000,\"publicationDate\":\"1990-10-01\",\"publicationTypes\":\"Journal Article\",\"fieldsOfStudy\":null,\"isOpenAccess\":false,\"openAccessPdf\":\"https://sci-hub-pdf.com/10.1007/BF02900699\",\"citationCount\":\"9\",\"resultStr\":null,\"platform\":\"Semanticscholar\",\"paperid\":null,\"PeriodicalName\":\"The Pavlovian journal of biological science\",\"FirstCategoryId\":\"1085\",\"ListUrlMain\":\"https://doi.org/10.1007/BF02900699\",\"RegionNum\":0,\"RegionCategory\":null,\"ArticlePicture\":[],\"TitleCN\":null,\"AbstractTextCN\":null,\"PMCID\":null,\"EPubDate\":\"\",\"PubModel\":\"\",\"JCR\":\"\",\"JCRName\":\"\",\"Score\":null,\"Total\":0}","platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"The Pavlovian journal of biological science","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1007/BF02900699","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"","JCRName":"","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 9
摘要
巴甫洛夫在20世纪30年代明确阐述了他对第二信号系统(特别是语言)的看法。这与他对物种间差异和人类神经症研究的兴趣同时发生。巴甫洛夫提出条件反射是具体现实的信号,而符号语言是对现实的抽象。从系统发育的角度来看,语言之所以出现在人类身上,是因为这种交流方式对人类有生存价值。巴甫洛夫的弟子L. A.奥尔贝利和N. I.克拉斯诺戈尔斯基曾考虑过语言的个体发生发展。A. G. ivanov - smolenskii的实验研究扩展了巴甫洛夫在精神病理学中对语言功能的实证研究。尽管巴甫洛夫对语言有持续的兴趣,但他并没有基于条件反射原理发展出语言习得理论。巴甫洛夫的语言概念化可能不是原创的,也没有对现代语言学做出重大贡献。它现在主要具有历史价值。然而,在高级神经活动理论的背景下,它对神经症的概念化很重要,并且在第二次世界大战后对苏联心理学产生了深远的政治影响。
The second signal system as conceived by Pavlov and his disciples.
Pavlov clearly formulated his ideas on the second signal system (specifically, language) in the 1930s. This occurred in conjunction with his interest in interspecies differences and in the study of human neuroses. Pavlov proposed that conditional reflexes signal concrete reality while symbolic-language provides abstractions of reality. Phylogenetically, language emerged in the humans because this form of communication had survival value to the species. Pavlov's disciples L. A. Orbeli and N. I. Krasnogorskiĭ had considered the ontogenetic development of language. The experimental investigation of A. G. Ivanov-Smolenskiĭ extended Pavlov's empirical study of the function of language in psychopathology. Notwithstanding a sustained interest in language, Pavlov did not develop a theory of language acquisition based upon the conditioning principle. Pavlov's conceptualization of language may not have been original, nor did it contribute significantly to modern linguistics. It is now mainly of historical interest. It was, nevertheless, important to the conceptualization of neuroses within the context of the theory of higher nervous activity and it had far-reaching political implications for Soviet psychology in the immediate post-World War II period.