屠夫

B. Asher
{"title":"屠夫","authors":"B. Asher","doi":"10.5040/9781780935898.0010-57","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"Burbridge ordered the retaliatory executions of over sixty people for guerrilla attacks in Kentucky. He ordered that four prisoners in military custody be shot for every Unionist citizen killed in a guerrilla raid. The idea was that such reprisals would restrain the guerrillas in the field, but his postwar critics attacked the killings as illegitimate military murders. This chapter argues that, while there were irregularities in the proceedings leading up to the executions, retaliation was (and is) an accepted part of the rules of war. Moreover, the criticisms of Burbridge’s enemies posited that anyone who had ever enlisted in the Confederacy—in uniform or out, in Union territory, or engaged in hostile actions—was entitled to prisoner-of-war status. Burbridge, subject to the Union’s understanding of the laws of war, saw these combatants differently.","PeriodicalId":356541,"journal":{"name":"The Most Hated Man in Kentucky","volume":"82 1","pages":"0"},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"2020-02-07","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":"{\"title\":\"Butcher\",\"authors\":\"B. Asher\",\"doi\":\"10.5040/9781780935898.0010-57\",\"DOIUrl\":null,\"url\":null,\"abstract\":\"Burbridge ordered the retaliatory executions of over sixty people for guerrilla attacks in Kentucky. He ordered that four prisoners in military custody be shot for every Unionist citizen killed in a guerrilla raid. The idea was that such reprisals would restrain the guerrillas in the field, but his postwar critics attacked the killings as illegitimate military murders. This chapter argues that, while there were irregularities in the proceedings leading up to the executions, retaliation was (and is) an accepted part of the rules of war. Moreover, the criticisms of Burbridge’s enemies posited that anyone who had ever enlisted in the Confederacy—in uniform or out, in Union territory, or engaged in hostile actions—was entitled to prisoner-of-war status. Burbridge, subject to the Union’s understanding of the laws of war, saw these combatants differently.\",\"PeriodicalId\":356541,\"journal\":{\"name\":\"The Most Hated Man in Kentucky\",\"volume\":\"82 1\",\"pages\":\"0\"},\"PeriodicalIF\":0.0000,\"publicationDate\":\"2020-02-07\",\"publicationTypes\":\"Journal Article\",\"fieldsOfStudy\":null,\"isOpenAccess\":false,\"openAccessPdf\":\"\",\"citationCount\":\"0\",\"resultStr\":null,\"platform\":\"Semanticscholar\",\"paperid\":null,\"PeriodicalName\":\"The Most Hated Man in Kentucky\",\"FirstCategoryId\":\"1085\",\"ListUrlMain\":\"https://doi.org/10.5040/9781780935898.0010-57\",\"RegionNum\":0,\"RegionCategory\":null,\"ArticlePicture\":[],\"TitleCN\":null,\"AbstractTextCN\":null,\"PMCID\":null,\"EPubDate\":\"\",\"PubModel\":\"\",\"JCR\":\"\",\"JCRName\":\"\",\"Score\":null,\"Total\":0}","platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"The Most Hated Man in Kentucky","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.5040/9781780935898.0010-57","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"","JCRName":"","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

摘要

伯布里奇下令对在肯塔基州进行游击队袭击的60多人进行报复性处决。他下令,在一次游击袭击中,每杀死一名统一党公民,就枪决四名被军事拘留的囚犯。他的想法是,这样的报复会在战场上约束游击队员,但战后批评他的人抨击这些杀戮是非法的军事谋杀。本章认为,虽然在导致处决的程序中存在违规行为,但报复过去是(现在也是)战争规则中可接受的一部分。此外,对伯布里奇敌人的批评认为,任何曾经在南部邦联入伍的人——无论是穿着制服还是在外面,在联邦领土上,或者从事敌对行动——都有权获得战俘地位。伯布里奇受联邦对战争法的理解的影响,对这些战士有不同的看法。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
Butcher
Burbridge ordered the retaliatory executions of over sixty people for guerrilla attacks in Kentucky. He ordered that four prisoners in military custody be shot for every Unionist citizen killed in a guerrilla raid. The idea was that such reprisals would restrain the guerrillas in the field, but his postwar critics attacked the killings as illegitimate military murders. This chapter argues that, while there were irregularities in the proceedings leading up to the executions, retaliation was (and is) an accepted part of the rules of war. Moreover, the criticisms of Burbridge’s enemies posited that anyone who had ever enlisted in the Confederacy—in uniform or out, in Union territory, or engaged in hostile actions—was entitled to prisoner-of-war status. Burbridge, subject to the Union’s understanding of the laws of war, saw these combatants differently.
求助全文
通过发布文献求助,成功后即可免费获取论文全文。 去求助
来源期刊
自引率
0.00%
发文量
0
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:604180095
Book学术官方微信