耳蜗植入物伪影减少与听觉怪异范式和不同包络刺激的脑电图数据*

Saskia M. Waechter, C. Simões‐Franklin, Jaclyn Smith, L. Viani, R. Reilly
{"title":"耳蜗植入物伪影减少与听觉怪异范式和不同包络刺激的脑电图数据*","authors":"Saskia M. Waechter, C. Simões‐Franklin, Jaclyn Smith, L. Viani, R. Reilly","doi":"10.1109/NER.2019.8717040","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"Cortical auditory evoked potentials (CAEPs) are a popular neurophysiological measure in the assessment of auditory processing capabilities. Research evidence suggests that CAEPs may be employed to assess auditory discrimination abilities, which is of particular interest in monitoring clinical rehabilitation outcomes in cochlear implant (CI) users. However, the electrical artefact from CI stimulation poses a challenge for the signal analysis. Numerous artefact reduction procedures have been proposed, many of which are computationally costly or subjectively biased. This study investigated a simplified approach to CI artefact reduction based on subtraction, which was enabled by introducing an enhanced auditory oddball paradigm. Outcome CAEPs were compared to the gold-standard artefact reduction based on independent component analysis (ICA). Grand average difference potentials showed successful artefact reduction for both artefact rejection algorithms in the enhanced oddball paradigm. With the enhanced oddball paradigm, measured peak-to-peak amplitudes were significantly larger with subtraction-based processing than for ICA-based processing, suggesting that the removed independent components not only contained artefact, but also neural activity of interest.","PeriodicalId":356177,"journal":{"name":"2019 9th International IEEE/EMBS Conference on Neural Engineering (NER)","volume":"87 1","pages":"0"},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"2019-03-20","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"2","resultStr":"{\"title\":\"Cochlear implant artefact reduction in electroencephalography data obtained with the auditory oddball paradigm and stimuli with differing envelopes *\",\"authors\":\"Saskia M. Waechter, C. Simões‐Franklin, Jaclyn Smith, L. Viani, R. Reilly\",\"doi\":\"10.1109/NER.2019.8717040\",\"DOIUrl\":null,\"url\":null,\"abstract\":\"Cortical auditory evoked potentials (CAEPs) are a popular neurophysiological measure in the assessment of auditory processing capabilities. Research evidence suggests that CAEPs may be employed to assess auditory discrimination abilities, which is of particular interest in monitoring clinical rehabilitation outcomes in cochlear implant (CI) users. However, the electrical artefact from CI stimulation poses a challenge for the signal analysis. Numerous artefact reduction procedures have been proposed, many of which are computationally costly or subjectively biased. This study investigated a simplified approach to CI artefact reduction based on subtraction, which was enabled by introducing an enhanced auditory oddball paradigm. Outcome CAEPs were compared to the gold-standard artefact reduction based on independent component analysis (ICA). Grand average difference potentials showed successful artefact reduction for both artefact rejection algorithms in the enhanced oddball paradigm. With the enhanced oddball paradigm, measured peak-to-peak amplitudes were significantly larger with subtraction-based processing than for ICA-based processing, suggesting that the removed independent components not only contained artefact, but also neural activity of interest.\",\"PeriodicalId\":356177,\"journal\":{\"name\":\"2019 9th International IEEE/EMBS Conference on Neural Engineering (NER)\",\"volume\":\"87 1\",\"pages\":\"0\"},\"PeriodicalIF\":0.0000,\"publicationDate\":\"2019-03-20\",\"publicationTypes\":\"Journal Article\",\"fieldsOfStudy\":null,\"isOpenAccess\":false,\"openAccessPdf\":\"\",\"citationCount\":\"2\",\"resultStr\":null,\"platform\":\"Semanticscholar\",\"paperid\":null,\"PeriodicalName\":\"2019 9th International IEEE/EMBS Conference on Neural Engineering (NER)\",\"FirstCategoryId\":\"1085\",\"ListUrlMain\":\"https://doi.org/10.1109/NER.2019.8717040\",\"RegionNum\":0,\"RegionCategory\":null,\"ArticlePicture\":[],\"TitleCN\":null,\"AbstractTextCN\":null,\"PMCID\":null,\"EPubDate\":\"\",\"PubModel\":\"\",\"JCR\":\"\",\"JCRName\":\"\",\"Score\":null,\"Total\":0}","platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"2019 9th International IEEE/EMBS Conference on Neural Engineering (NER)","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1109/NER.2019.8717040","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"","JCRName":"","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 2

摘要

皮层听觉诱发电位(CAEPs)是评价听觉加工能力的常用神经生理指标。研究证据表明,caep可用于评估听觉辨别能力,这对监测人工耳蜗(CI)使用者的临床康复结果特别感兴趣。然而,CI刺激产生的电伪影对信号分析提出了挑战。已经提出了许多人工制品减少程序,其中许多是计算成本高或主观偏见。本研究研究了一种基于减法的CI伪影减少的简化方法,该方法通过引入增强的听觉怪异范式来实现。结果caep与基于独立成分分析(ICA)的金标准伪影减少进行比较。在增强奇球范式中,大平均差电位显示两种伪影抑制算法都成功地减少了伪影。在增强的odd - ball范式中,基于减法处理的测量峰间振幅明显大于基于ica处理的,这表明去除的独立分量不仅包含伪影,还包含感兴趣的神经活动。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
Cochlear implant artefact reduction in electroencephalography data obtained with the auditory oddball paradigm and stimuli with differing envelopes *
Cortical auditory evoked potentials (CAEPs) are a popular neurophysiological measure in the assessment of auditory processing capabilities. Research evidence suggests that CAEPs may be employed to assess auditory discrimination abilities, which is of particular interest in monitoring clinical rehabilitation outcomes in cochlear implant (CI) users. However, the electrical artefact from CI stimulation poses a challenge for the signal analysis. Numerous artefact reduction procedures have been proposed, many of which are computationally costly or subjectively biased. This study investigated a simplified approach to CI artefact reduction based on subtraction, which was enabled by introducing an enhanced auditory oddball paradigm. Outcome CAEPs were compared to the gold-standard artefact reduction based on independent component analysis (ICA). Grand average difference potentials showed successful artefact reduction for both artefact rejection algorithms in the enhanced oddball paradigm. With the enhanced oddball paradigm, measured peak-to-peak amplitudes were significantly larger with subtraction-based processing than for ICA-based processing, suggesting that the removed independent components not only contained artefact, but also neural activity of interest.
求助全文
通过发布文献求助,成功后即可免费获取论文全文。 去求助
来源期刊
自引率
0.00%
发文量
0
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术官方微信