以消费者为中心的市场模式在巴西的分析

Pedro Barbosa, B. Dias, T. Soares
{"title":"以消费者为中心的市场模式在巴西的分析","authors":"Pedro Barbosa, B. Dias, T. Soares","doi":"10.1109/TDLA47668.2020.9326204","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"In recent years, the large deployment of distributed energy resources (DERs) in low voltage networks is changing the traditional approach to power systems. This massive change is pushing towards new solutions to improve energy trading in low voltage networks. Consumer-centric options, such as full peer-to-peer (P2P) and energy community markets (CM) are seen as viable options to increase the active participation of end-users in the electricity markets. This work studies the full P2P and CM market approaches applied to the actual regulatory framework in Brazil, evaluating and comparing both approaches to be potentially applied in Brazil. A case study based on a typical Brazilian neighborhood is designed, allowing to assess the behavior of consumers and prosumers in both markets. The results show the economic viability of both models, considering the social welfare and the penetration of distributed generation in the system. An important conclusion under the current regulatory framework is that the full P2P can have greater benefits over the CM, as long as the distributed generation is enough to confer near self-sufficiency to the peer’s demand.","PeriodicalId":448644,"journal":{"name":"2020 IEEE PES Transmission & Distribution Conference and Exhibition - Latin America (T&D LA)","volume":"3 1","pages":"0"},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"2020-09-28","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"3","resultStr":"{\"title\":\"Analysis of consumer-centric market models in the Brazilian context\",\"authors\":\"Pedro Barbosa, B. Dias, T. Soares\",\"doi\":\"10.1109/TDLA47668.2020.9326204\",\"DOIUrl\":null,\"url\":null,\"abstract\":\"In recent years, the large deployment of distributed energy resources (DERs) in low voltage networks is changing the traditional approach to power systems. This massive change is pushing towards new solutions to improve energy trading in low voltage networks. Consumer-centric options, such as full peer-to-peer (P2P) and energy community markets (CM) are seen as viable options to increase the active participation of end-users in the electricity markets. This work studies the full P2P and CM market approaches applied to the actual regulatory framework in Brazil, evaluating and comparing both approaches to be potentially applied in Brazil. A case study based on a typical Brazilian neighborhood is designed, allowing to assess the behavior of consumers and prosumers in both markets. The results show the economic viability of both models, considering the social welfare and the penetration of distributed generation in the system. An important conclusion under the current regulatory framework is that the full P2P can have greater benefits over the CM, as long as the distributed generation is enough to confer near self-sufficiency to the peer’s demand.\",\"PeriodicalId\":448644,\"journal\":{\"name\":\"2020 IEEE PES Transmission & Distribution Conference and Exhibition - Latin America (T&D LA)\",\"volume\":\"3 1\",\"pages\":\"0\"},\"PeriodicalIF\":0.0000,\"publicationDate\":\"2020-09-28\",\"publicationTypes\":\"Journal Article\",\"fieldsOfStudy\":null,\"isOpenAccess\":false,\"openAccessPdf\":\"\",\"citationCount\":\"3\",\"resultStr\":null,\"platform\":\"Semanticscholar\",\"paperid\":null,\"PeriodicalName\":\"2020 IEEE PES Transmission & Distribution Conference and Exhibition - Latin America (T&D LA)\",\"FirstCategoryId\":\"1085\",\"ListUrlMain\":\"https://doi.org/10.1109/TDLA47668.2020.9326204\",\"RegionNum\":0,\"RegionCategory\":null,\"ArticlePicture\":[],\"TitleCN\":null,\"AbstractTextCN\":null,\"PMCID\":null,\"EPubDate\":\"\",\"PubModel\":\"\",\"JCR\":\"\",\"JCRName\":\"\",\"Score\":null,\"Total\":0}","platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"2020 IEEE PES Transmission & Distribution Conference and Exhibition - Latin America (T&D LA)","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1109/TDLA47668.2020.9326204","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"","JCRName":"","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 3

摘要

近年来,分布式能源在低压电网中的大规模部署正在改变传统的电力系统方式。这种巨大的变化正在推动新的解决方案,以改善低压电网的能源交易。以消费者为中心的选择,如完全点对点(P2P)和能源社区市场(CM)被视为增加终端用户积极参与电力市场的可行选择。这项工作研究了应用于巴西实际监管框架的完整P2P和CM市场方法,评估和比较了两种可能在巴西应用的方法。设计了一个基于典型巴西社区的案例研究,以评估两个市场中消费者和生产消费者的行为。结果表明,考虑到社会福利和分布式发电在系统中的渗透率,两种模型都具有经济可行性。在当前的监管框架下,一个重要的结论是,完全的P2P可以比CM有更大的好处,只要分布式发电足以使对等的需求接近自给自足。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
Analysis of consumer-centric market models in the Brazilian context
In recent years, the large deployment of distributed energy resources (DERs) in low voltage networks is changing the traditional approach to power systems. This massive change is pushing towards new solutions to improve energy trading in low voltage networks. Consumer-centric options, such as full peer-to-peer (P2P) and energy community markets (CM) are seen as viable options to increase the active participation of end-users in the electricity markets. This work studies the full P2P and CM market approaches applied to the actual regulatory framework in Brazil, evaluating and comparing both approaches to be potentially applied in Brazil. A case study based on a typical Brazilian neighborhood is designed, allowing to assess the behavior of consumers and prosumers in both markets. The results show the economic viability of both models, considering the social welfare and the penetration of distributed generation in the system. An important conclusion under the current regulatory framework is that the full P2P can have greater benefits over the CM, as long as the distributed generation is enough to confer near self-sufficiency to the peer’s demand.
求助全文
通过发布文献求助,成功后即可免费获取论文全文。 去求助
来源期刊
自引率
0.00%
发文量
0
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:604180095
Book学术官方微信