{"title":"南极金钟湾浅海岸带浮游生物群落结构:两个连续夏季的比较","authors":"D. R. Tenenbaum, J. J. Barrera-Alba, M. Tenório","doi":"10.4322/APA.2015.014","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"The main objective of this work was to investigate interannual changes of phytoplankton structure as part of a long-term monitoring program in Admiralty Bay, Antarctic Peninsula. Based on microscopic analysis, phytoplankton taxonomic composition and biomass are investigated since 2009. This report presents results from the 2009/2010 and 2010/2011 summer surveys regarding the phytoplankton size-structure and biomass. Four scenarios were proposed in our study for environmental conditions and phytoplankton community: 1) 2009/2010 Early Summer; diatom growth was promoted by high Si:N, but inhibited by low N:P and low temperature, 2) 2009/2010 Late Summer; diatom growth was inhibited by low N:P and low Si:N, and high temperature and low N:P promoted dinoflagellates growth, due to their low optimum N:P ratios compared to diatoms; 3) 2010/2011 Early Summer; diatom growth was promoted by high N:P, high Si:N and high temperature and 4) 2010/2011 Late Summer; blooms of chain-forming diatoms (e.g. Thalassiosira spp.), favoured by high Si:N and high temperature, and it could explain the drastic reduction both in nitrate and silicate. The microplankton community of Admiralty Bay presented a high variability during the studied period that was clearly dictated by environmental factors. The time window covered by this study gives us only a glimpse of the direction of long term changes that the Antarctic environment might be experiencing. A more complete picture of such trends relies heavily on the continuity of the long-term monitoring program.","PeriodicalId":169975,"journal":{"name":"INCT-APA Annual Activity Report","volume":"175 1","pages":"0"},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"1900-01-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"1","resultStr":"{\"title\":\"MICROPLANKTON COMMUNITY STRUCTURE OF THE SHALLOW COASTAL ZONE AT ADMIRALTY BAY, ANTARCTICA: COMPARISON BETWEEN TWO CONSECUTIVE AUSTRAL SUMMERS\",\"authors\":\"D. R. Tenenbaum, J. J. Barrera-Alba, M. Tenório\",\"doi\":\"10.4322/APA.2015.014\",\"DOIUrl\":null,\"url\":null,\"abstract\":\"The main objective of this work was to investigate interannual changes of phytoplankton structure as part of a long-term monitoring program in Admiralty Bay, Antarctic Peninsula. Based on microscopic analysis, phytoplankton taxonomic composition and biomass are investigated since 2009. This report presents results from the 2009/2010 and 2010/2011 summer surveys regarding the phytoplankton size-structure and biomass. Four scenarios were proposed in our study for environmental conditions and phytoplankton community: 1) 2009/2010 Early Summer; diatom growth was promoted by high Si:N, but inhibited by low N:P and low temperature, 2) 2009/2010 Late Summer; diatom growth was inhibited by low N:P and low Si:N, and high temperature and low N:P promoted dinoflagellates growth, due to their low optimum N:P ratios compared to diatoms; 3) 2010/2011 Early Summer; diatom growth was promoted by high N:P, high Si:N and high temperature and 4) 2010/2011 Late Summer; blooms of chain-forming diatoms (e.g. Thalassiosira spp.), favoured by high Si:N and high temperature, and it could explain the drastic reduction both in nitrate and silicate. The microplankton community of Admiralty Bay presented a high variability during the studied period that was clearly dictated by environmental factors. The time window covered by this study gives us only a glimpse of the direction of long term changes that the Antarctic environment might be experiencing. A more complete picture of such trends relies heavily on the continuity of the long-term monitoring program.\",\"PeriodicalId\":169975,\"journal\":{\"name\":\"INCT-APA Annual Activity Report\",\"volume\":\"175 1\",\"pages\":\"0\"},\"PeriodicalIF\":0.0000,\"publicationDate\":\"1900-01-01\",\"publicationTypes\":\"Journal Article\",\"fieldsOfStudy\":null,\"isOpenAccess\":false,\"openAccessPdf\":\"\",\"citationCount\":\"1\",\"resultStr\":null,\"platform\":\"Semanticscholar\",\"paperid\":null,\"PeriodicalName\":\"INCT-APA Annual Activity Report\",\"FirstCategoryId\":\"1085\",\"ListUrlMain\":\"https://doi.org/10.4322/APA.2015.014\",\"RegionNum\":0,\"RegionCategory\":null,\"ArticlePicture\":[],\"TitleCN\":null,\"AbstractTextCN\":null,\"PMCID\":null,\"EPubDate\":\"\",\"PubModel\":\"\",\"JCR\":\"\",\"JCRName\":\"\",\"Score\":null,\"Total\":0}","platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"INCT-APA Annual Activity Report","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.4322/APA.2015.014","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"","JCRName":"","Score":null,"Total":0}
MICROPLANKTON COMMUNITY STRUCTURE OF THE SHALLOW COASTAL ZONE AT ADMIRALTY BAY, ANTARCTICA: COMPARISON BETWEEN TWO CONSECUTIVE AUSTRAL SUMMERS
The main objective of this work was to investigate interannual changes of phytoplankton structure as part of a long-term monitoring program in Admiralty Bay, Antarctic Peninsula. Based on microscopic analysis, phytoplankton taxonomic composition and biomass are investigated since 2009. This report presents results from the 2009/2010 and 2010/2011 summer surveys regarding the phytoplankton size-structure and biomass. Four scenarios were proposed in our study for environmental conditions and phytoplankton community: 1) 2009/2010 Early Summer; diatom growth was promoted by high Si:N, but inhibited by low N:P and low temperature, 2) 2009/2010 Late Summer; diatom growth was inhibited by low N:P and low Si:N, and high temperature and low N:P promoted dinoflagellates growth, due to their low optimum N:P ratios compared to diatoms; 3) 2010/2011 Early Summer; diatom growth was promoted by high N:P, high Si:N and high temperature and 4) 2010/2011 Late Summer; blooms of chain-forming diatoms (e.g. Thalassiosira spp.), favoured by high Si:N and high temperature, and it could explain the drastic reduction both in nitrate and silicate. The microplankton community of Admiralty Bay presented a high variability during the studied period that was clearly dictated by environmental factors. The time window covered by this study gives us only a glimpse of the direction of long term changes that the Antarctic environment might be experiencing. A more complete picture of such trends relies heavily on the continuity of the long-term monitoring program.