6种新型冠状病毒核酸检测试剂检测性能的比较分析

Yuanyuan Guo, Kun Wang, Yu Zhang, Wen-Ju Zhang, Liying Wang, P. Liao
{"title":"6种新型冠状病毒核酸检测试剂检测性能的比较分析","authors":"Yuanyuan Guo, Kun Wang, Yu Zhang, Wen-Ju Zhang, Liying Wang, P. Liao","doi":"10.3760/CMA.J.ISSN.9999-998X.2020.0023","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"Objective \nTo compare and analyse the detection performance of different 2019-new coronavirus (2019-nCoV) nucleic acid detection kits, in order to provide references for laboratory. \n \n \nMethods \nSix kinds of domestic reagents (A—F reagent) were selected for parallel detection of a series of samples from one patient in this hospital whose 2019-nCoV nucleic acid result was confirmed weakly positive. The samples were taken at three different times, the RNAs were extracted and amplified, and two parallel tests were performed each time by use of these six kits. The detection performance was compared according to the results of each kit. \n \n \nResults \nThe three parallel test results (ORF1ab and N gene) of C and F reagents were positive, the results of D reagent showed the N gene was not detected, and the results of A, B, E reagents showed the ORF1ab gene was not detected sometimes. The reproducibility of in-batch detections by C reagent was the best, and the CT values of F reagents (N and ORF1ab), E reagents (ORF1ab) and A reagents (ORF1ab) showed changes in trend. \n \n \nConclusion \nThere are differences in the detection ability of six 2019-nCoV nucleic acid detection reagents for weakly positive samples, and the accuracy, sensitivity and reproducibility of some reagents are not good. There is an urgent need to further optimize and improve their performance in order to better meet the needs of large-scale screening. \n \n \nKey words: \n2019 new coronavirus; nucleic acid detection; reagent kits, diagnostic; performance comparison","PeriodicalId":355327,"journal":{"name":"Chongqing Medicine","volume":"26 1","pages":"0"},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"2020-02-28","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"9","resultStr":"{\"title\":\"Comparison and analysis of the detection performance of six new coronavirus nucleic acid detection reagents/ 重庆医学\",\"authors\":\"Yuanyuan Guo, Kun Wang, Yu Zhang, Wen-Ju Zhang, Liying Wang, P. Liao\",\"doi\":\"10.3760/CMA.J.ISSN.9999-998X.2020.0023\",\"DOIUrl\":null,\"url\":null,\"abstract\":\"Objective \\nTo compare and analyse the detection performance of different 2019-new coronavirus (2019-nCoV) nucleic acid detection kits, in order to provide references for laboratory. \\n \\n \\nMethods \\nSix kinds of domestic reagents (A—F reagent) were selected for parallel detection of a series of samples from one patient in this hospital whose 2019-nCoV nucleic acid result was confirmed weakly positive. The samples were taken at three different times, the RNAs were extracted and amplified, and two parallel tests were performed each time by use of these six kits. The detection performance was compared according to the results of each kit. \\n \\n \\nResults \\nThe three parallel test results (ORF1ab and N gene) of C and F reagents were positive, the results of D reagent showed the N gene was not detected, and the results of A, B, E reagents showed the ORF1ab gene was not detected sometimes. The reproducibility of in-batch detections by C reagent was the best, and the CT values of F reagents (N and ORF1ab), E reagents (ORF1ab) and A reagents (ORF1ab) showed changes in trend. \\n \\n \\nConclusion \\nThere are differences in the detection ability of six 2019-nCoV nucleic acid detection reagents for weakly positive samples, and the accuracy, sensitivity and reproducibility of some reagents are not good. There is an urgent need to further optimize and improve their performance in order to better meet the needs of large-scale screening. \\n \\n \\nKey words: \\n2019 new coronavirus; nucleic acid detection; reagent kits, diagnostic; performance comparison\",\"PeriodicalId\":355327,\"journal\":{\"name\":\"Chongqing Medicine\",\"volume\":\"26 1\",\"pages\":\"0\"},\"PeriodicalIF\":0.0000,\"publicationDate\":\"2020-02-28\",\"publicationTypes\":\"Journal Article\",\"fieldsOfStudy\":null,\"isOpenAccess\":false,\"openAccessPdf\":\"\",\"citationCount\":\"9\",\"resultStr\":null,\"platform\":\"Semanticscholar\",\"paperid\":null,\"PeriodicalName\":\"Chongqing Medicine\",\"FirstCategoryId\":\"1085\",\"ListUrlMain\":\"https://doi.org/10.3760/CMA.J.ISSN.9999-998X.2020.0023\",\"RegionNum\":0,\"RegionCategory\":null,\"ArticlePicture\":[],\"TitleCN\":null,\"AbstractTextCN\":null,\"PMCID\":null,\"EPubDate\":\"\",\"PubModel\":\"\",\"JCR\":\"\",\"JCRName\":\"\",\"Score\":null,\"Total\":0}","platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Chongqing Medicine","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.3760/CMA.J.ISSN.9999-998X.2020.0023","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"","JCRName":"","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 9

摘要

目的比较分析不同新型冠状病毒(2019-nCoV)核酸检测试剂盒的检测性能,为实验室提供参考。方法选择6种国产试剂(a - f试剂),对我院1例新型冠状病毒核酸检测结果为弱阳性的患者的一系列样本进行平行检测。在三个不同的时间采集样本,提取和扩增rna,每次使用这六个试剂盒进行两次平行测试。根据各试剂盒的检测结果比较检测性能。结果C试剂和F试剂的ORF1ab和N基因三个平行检测结果均为阳性,D试剂的结果显示未检测到N基因,A、B、E试剂的结果显示有时未检测到ORF1ab基因。C试剂批量检测的重现性最好,F试剂(N和ORF1ab)、E试剂(ORF1ab)和A试剂(ORF1ab)的CT值呈变化趋势。结论6种新型冠状病毒核酸检测试剂对弱阳性样本的检测能力存在差异,部分试剂的准确性、灵敏度和重现性较差。迫切需要进一步优化和提高其性能,以更好地满足大规模筛选的需要。关键词:2019新型冠状病毒;核酸检测;诊断用试剂盒;性能比较
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
Comparison and analysis of the detection performance of six new coronavirus nucleic acid detection reagents/ 重庆医学
Objective To compare and analyse the detection performance of different 2019-new coronavirus (2019-nCoV) nucleic acid detection kits, in order to provide references for laboratory. Methods Six kinds of domestic reagents (A—F reagent) were selected for parallel detection of a series of samples from one patient in this hospital whose 2019-nCoV nucleic acid result was confirmed weakly positive. The samples were taken at three different times, the RNAs were extracted and amplified, and two parallel tests were performed each time by use of these six kits. The detection performance was compared according to the results of each kit. Results The three parallel test results (ORF1ab and N gene) of C and F reagents were positive, the results of D reagent showed the N gene was not detected, and the results of A, B, E reagents showed the ORF1ab gene was not detected sometimes. The reproducibility of in-batch detections by C reagent was the best, and the CT values of F reagents (N and ORF1ab), E reagents (ORF1ab) and A reagents (ORF1ab) showed changes in trend. Conclusion There are differences in the detection ability of six 2019-nCoV nucleic acid detection reagents for weakly positive samples, and the accuracy, sensitivity and reproducibility of some reagents are not good. There is an urgent need to further optimize and improve their performance in order to better meet the needs of large-scale screening. Key words: 2019 new coronavirus; nucleic acid detection; reagent kits, diagnostic; performance comparison
求助全文
通过发布文献求助,成功后即可免费获取论文全文。 去求助
来源期刊
自引率
0.00%
发文量
0
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术官方微信