像印度东北部殖民地一样遗忘

T. Simpson
{"title":"像印度东北部殖民地一样遗忘","authors":"T. Simpson","doi":"10.1093/oso/9780190914400.003.0012","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"What if governing and \"seeing\" like a state is actually about forgetting and misdirecting as much as it is about accumulating and communicating? In the colonial north-east during the early nineteenth century, governing and knowing peoples and spaces relied not on flows of knowledge, but on intermittent and selective adaptations of previously formulated information. This was not simply a product of unintended shortcomings, but resulted from deliberate attempts by British administrators to ensure that knowledge did not easily traverse time and space. These \"men on the spot\" sought to make many of their activities opaque to outsiders, including their institutional superiors.\nFocusing on David Scott, the leading colonial official during and immediately after the British annexation of Assam, this chapter proposes that conventional models for understanding modern colonial state-building and knowledge production do not fit this region. It argues that governing and comprehending the early colonial north-east emerged as much from creative engagements with myopia and amnesia as from clear-sighted and accumulative \"state simplifications\".","PeriodicalId":403338,"journal":{"name":"Mountstuart Elphinstone in South Asia","volume":"24 1","pages":"0"},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"2019-07-15","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":"{\"title\":\"Forgetting like a State in Colonial North-East India\",\"authors\":\"T. Simpson\",\"doi\":\"10.1093/oso/9780190914400.003.0012\",\"DOIUrl\":null,\"url\":null,\"abstract\":\"What if governing and \\\"seeing\\\" like a state is actually about forgetting and misdirecting as much as it is about accumulating and communicating? In the colonial north-east during the early nineteenth century, governing and knowing peoples and spaces relied not on flows of knowledge, but on intermittent and selective adaptations of previously formulated information. This was not simply a product of unintended shortcomings, but resulted from deliberate attempts by British administrators to ensure that knowledge did not easily traverse time and space. These \\\"men on the spot\\\" sought to make many of their activities opaque to outsiders, including their institutional superiors.\\nFocusing on David Scott, the leading colonial official during and immediately after the British annexation of Assam, this chapter proposes that conventional models for understanding modern colonial state-building and knowledge production do not fit this region. It argues that governing and comprehending the early colonial north-east emerged as much from creative engagements with myopia and amnesia as from clear-sighted and accumulative \\\"state simplifications\\\".\",\"PeriodicalId\":403338,\"journal\":{\"name\":\"Mountstuart Elphinstone in South Asia\",\"volume\":\"24 1\",\"pages\":\"0\"},\"PeriodicalIF\":0.0000,\"publicationDate\":\"2019-07-15\",\"publicationTypes\":\"Journal Article\",\"fieldsOfStudy\":null,\"isOpenAccess\":false,\"openAccessPdf\":\"\",\"citationCount\":\"0\",\"resultStr\":null,\"platform\":\"Semanticscholar\",\"paperid\":null,\"PeriodicalName\":\"Mountstuart Elphinstone in South Asia\",\"FirstCategoryId\":\"1085\",\"ListUrlMain\":\"https://doi.org/10.1093/oso/9780190914400.003.0012\",\"RegionNum\":0,\"RegionCategory\":null,\"ArticlePicture\":[],\"TitleCN\":null,\"AbstractTextCN\":null,\"PMCID\":null,\"EPubDate\":\"\",\"PubModel\":\"\",\"JCR\":\"\",\"JCRName\":\"\",\"Score\":null,\"Total\":0}","platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Mountstuart Elphinstone in South Asia","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1093/oso/9780190914400.003.0012","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"","JCRName":"","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

摘要

如果管理和“看到”一个国家实际上是关于遗忘和误导,就像积累和沟通一样多呢?在19世纪早期的东北殖民地,统治和了解人民和空间并不依赖于知识的流动,而是依赖于对先前形成的信息的间歇性和选择性的适应。这不仅仅是无意中出现的缺陷的产物,而是英国管理者故意确保知识不会轻易穿越时空的结果。这些“在场的人”试图让他们的许多活动对外人不透明,包括他们的上级。本章以英国吞并阿萨姆邦期间和之后的主要殖民官员大卫·斯科特(David Scott)为重点,提出理解现代殖民国家建设和知识生产的传统模式不适合这个地区。它认为,管理和理解早期殖民时期的东北,既来自于远见卓识和积累的“国家简化”,也同样来自于对近视和失忆的创造性接触。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
Forgetting like a State in Colonial North-East India
What if governing and "seeing" like a state is actually about forgetting and misdirecting as much as it is about accumulating and communicating? In the colonial north-east during the early nineteenth century, governing and knowing peoples and spaces relied not on flows of knowledge, but on intermittent and selective adaptations of previously formulated information. This was not simply a product of unintended shortcomings, but resulted from deliberate attempts by British administrators to ensure that knowledge did not easily traverse time and space. These "men on the spot" sought to make many of their activities opaque to outsiders, including their institutional superiors. Focusing on David Scott, the leading colonial official during and immediately after the British annexation of Assam, this chapter proposes that conventional models for understanding modern colonial state-building and knowledge production do not fit this region. It argues that governing and comprehending the early colonial north-east emerged as much from creative engagements with myopia and amnesia as from clear-sighted and accumulative "state simplifications".
求助全文
通过发布文献求助,成功后即可免费获取论文全文。 去求助
来源期刊
自引率
0.00%
发文量
0
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:604180095
Book学术官方微信