形成性选择题解题模式和评分类型对学生高阶思维能力的影响

Andi Taufiq Umar
{"title":"形成性选择题解题模式和评分类型对学生高阶思维能力的影响","authors":"Andi Taufiq Umar","doi":"10.21009/JISAE.041.03","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"Abstract        : This research is a type 2x2 factorial design that aims to see the correlation between problem solving model and scoring type of multiple choice formative test in improving students' HOTS capability in Chemistry lesson. Type of scoring test is divided into two sub-variables that scoring by scores and scores are appropriate while the learning model consists of problem solving model and direct learning model. The student's HOTS capability consists of three stages of cognitive namely analysis, evaluation, and synthesis by using choice of choice test with several HOTS answer choices that have been validated by experts and panelists. The population in this study is all students of SMA Negeri in East Luwu regency. Sampling was done by cluster random sampling with total sample of 80 students who were integrated into empathy groups consisting of 20 samples per group. The result of analysis shows that FO value in main effect test and interaction effect is bigger than Ftable value is 3,968 which show the influence of interacation between problem solving model and scoring type to students’s HOTS ability.","PeriodicalId":262250,"journal":{"name":"JISAE: Journal of Indonesian Student Assessment and Evaluation","volume":"30 1","pages":"0"},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"2019-05-15","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":"{\"title\":\"THE EFFECT OF PROBLEM SOLVING MODEL AND SCORING TYPE OF MULTIPLE-CHOICE FORMATIVE TESTS ON STUDENT HIGH ORDER THINKING SKILLS (HOTS) ABILITY\",\"authors\":\"Andi Taufiq Umar\",\"doi\":\"10.21009/JISAE.041.03\",\"DOIUrl\":null,\"url\":null,\"abstract\":\"Abstract        : This research is a type 2x2 factorial design that aims to see the correlation between problem solving model and scoring type of multiple choice formative test in improving students' HOTS capability in Chemistry lesson. Type of scoring test is divided into two sub-variables that scoring by scores and scores are appropriate while the learning model consists of problem solving model and direct learning model. The student's HOTS capability consists of three stages of cognitive namely analysis, evaluation, and synthesis by using choice of choice test with several HOTS answer choices that have been validated by experts and panelists. The population in this study is all students of SMA Negeri in East Luwu regency. Sampling was done by cluster random sampling with total sample of 80 students who were integrated into empathy groups consisting of 20 samples per group. The result of analysis shows that FO value in main effect test and interaction effect is bigger than Ftable value is 3,968 which show the influence of interacation between problem solving model and scoring type to students’s HOTS ability.\",\"PeriodicalId\":262250,\"journal\":{\"name\":\"JISAE: Journal of Indonesian Student Assessment and Evaluation\",\"volume\":\"30 1\",\"pages\":\"0\"},\"PeriodicalIF\":0.0000,\"publicationDate\":\"2019-05-15\",\"publicationTypes\":\"Journal Article\",\"fieldsOfStudy\":null,\"isOpenAccess\":false,\"openAccessPdf\":\"\",\"citationCount\":\"0\",\"resultStr\":null,\"platform\":\"Semanticscholar\",\"paperid\":null,\"PeriodicalName\":\"JISAE: Journal of Indonesian Student Assessment and Evaluation\",\"FirstCategoryId\":\"1085\",\"ListUrlMain\":\"https://doi.org/10.21009/JISAE.041.03\",\"RegionNum\":0,\"RegionCategory\":null,\"ArticlePicture\":[],\"TitleCN\":null,\"AbstractTextCN\":null,\"PMCID\":null,\"EPubDate\":\"\",\"PubModel\":\"\",\"JCR\":\"\",\"JCRName\":\"\",\"Score\":null,\"Total\":0}","platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"JISAE: Journal of Indonesian Student Assessment and Evaluation","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.21009/JISAE.041.03","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"","JCRName":"","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

摘要

摘要:本研究采用2x2型析因设计,旨在考察问题解决模式与形成性选择题得分类型对提高学生化学课HOTS能力的相关性。计分测试类型分为分分计分和分适两个子变量,学习模式分为问题解决模式和直接学习模式。学生的HOTS能力包括三个认知阶段,即分析、评估和综合,通过选择测试,几个HOTS答案选择已被专家和小组成员验证。本研究的人群均为东鲁武县SMA Negeri的学生。抽样采用整群随机抽样,共80名学生被纳入共情组,每组20名。分析结果表明,主效应检验和交互效应的FO值均大于Ftable值为3968,说明问题解决模式和评分类型的交互作用对学生的HOTS能力的影响。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
THE EFFECT OF PROBLEM SOLVING MODEL AND SCORING TYPE OF MULTIPLE-CHOICE FORMATIVE TESTS ON STUDENT HIGH ORDER THINKING SKILLS (HOTS) ABILITY
Abstract        : This research is a type 2x2 factorial design that aims to see the correlation between problem solving model and scoring type of multiple choice formative test in improving students' HOTS capability in Chemistry lesson. Type of scoring test is divided into two sub-variables that scoring by scores and scores are appropriate while the learning model consists of problem solving model and direct learning model. The student's HOTS capability consists of three stages of cognitive namely analysis, evaluation, and synthesis by using choice of choice test with several HOTS answer choices that have been validated by experts and panelists. The population in this study is all students of SMA Negeri in East Luwu regency. Sampling was done by cluster random sampling with total sample of 80 students who were integrated into empathy groups consisting of 20 samples per group. The result of analysis shows that FO value in main effect test and interaction effect is bigger than Ftable value is 3,968 which show the influence of interacation between problem solving model and scoring type to students’s HOTS ability.
求助全文
通过发布文献求助,成功后即可免费获取论文全文。 去求助
来源期刊
自引率
0.00%
发文量
0
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术官方微信