废除印度计划委员会:五年后的结果

A. Roberts
{"title":"废除印度计划委员会:五年后的结果","authors":"A. Roberts","doi":"10.2139/ssrn.3644479","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"Like other countries, India wrestles with the question of how to plan for the long-term in a society where political and economic power is widely diffused. In 2015, Indian Prime Minister Narendra Modi abolished the Planning Commission and established a new body, NITI Aayog. Political and economic developments had been working against the Planning Commission for decades. Critics have disparaged NITI Aayog as an ineffective body that is too dependent on the Prime Minister. Some have called for a revived planning body with more independence and power, and some have looked to China for a model. India cannot adopt the Chinese approach. But there may be a case for a body stronger and more autonomous than NITI Aayog, that can serve as a voice for the country's long-term needs.","PeriodicalId":170072,"journal":{"name":"ERPN: Public Administration (Sub-Topic)","volume":"304 1","pages":"0"},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"2020-08-19","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":"{\"title\":\"Abolishing India's Planning Commission: The Results After Five Years\",\"authors\":\"A. Roberts\",\"doi\":\"10.2139/ssrn.3644479\",\"DOIUrl\":null,\"url\":null,\"abstract\":\"Like other countries, India wrestles with the question of how to plan for the long-term in a society where political and economic power is widely diffused. In 2015, Indian Prime Minister Narendra Modi abolished the Planning Commission and established a new body, NITI Aayog. Political and economic developments had been working against the Planning Commission for decades. Critics have disparaged NITI Aayog as an ineffective body that is too dependent on the Prime Minister. Some have called for a revived planning body with more independence and power, and some have looked to China for a model. India cannot adopt the Chinese approach. But there may be a case for a body stronger and more autonomous than NITI Aayog, that can serve as a voice for the country's long-term needs.\",\"PeriodicalId\":170072,\"journal\":{\"name\":\"ERPN: Public Administration (Sub-Topic)\",\"volume\":\"304 1\",\"pages\":\"0\"},\"PeriodicalIF\":0.0000,\"publicationDate\":\"2020-08-19\",\"publicationTypes\":\"Journal Article\",\"fieldsOfStudy\":null,\"isOpenAccess\":false,\"openAccessPdf\":\"\",\"citationCount\":\"0\",\"resultStr\":null,\"platform\":\"Semanticscholar\",\"paperid\":null,\"PeriodicalName\":\"ERPN: Public Administration (Sub-Topic)\",\"FirstCategoryId\":\"1085\",\"ListUrlMain\":\"https://doi.org/10.2139/ssrn.3644479\",\"RegionNum\":0,\"RegionCategory\":null,\"ArticlePicture\":[],\"TitleCN\":null,\"AbstractTextCN\":null,\"PMCID\":null,\"EPubDate\":\"\",\"PubModel\":\"\",\"JCR\":\"\",\"JCRName\":\"\",\"Score\":null,\"Total\":0}","platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"ERPN: Public Administration (Sub-Topic)","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.2139/ssrn.3644479","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"","JCRName":"","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

摘要

与其他国家一样,印度也在努力解决如何在一个政治和经济权力广泛分散的社会中进行长期规划的问题。2015年,印度总理纳伦德拉·莫迪(Narendra Modi)废除了计划委员会,并成立了一个新的机构——国家规划委员会(NITI Aayog)。几十年来,政治和经济发展一直对计划委员会不利。批评人士贬低NITI Aayog是一个效率低下的机构,过于依赖总理。一些人呼吁重新组建一个拥有更多独立性和权力的规划机构,一些人则向中国寻求榜样。印度不能采取中国的做法。但或许有理由成立一个比NITI Aayog更强大、更自主的机构,为国家的长期需求发声。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
Abolishing India's Planning Commission: The Results After Five Years
Like other countries, India wrestles with the question of how to plan for the long-term in a society where political and economic power is widely diffused. In 2015, Indian Prime Minister Narendra Modi abolished the Planning Commission and established a new body, NITI Aayog. Political and economic developments had been working against the Planning Commission for decades. Critics have disparaged NITI Aayog as an ineffective body that is too dependent on the Prime Minister. Some have called for a revived planning body with more independence and power, and some have looked to China for a model. India cannot adopt the Chinese approach. But there may be a case for a body stronger and more autonomous than NITI Aayog, that can serve as a voice for the country's long-term needs.
求助全文
通过发布文献求助,成功后即可免费获取论文全文。 去求助
来源期刊
自引率
0.00%
发文量
0
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术官方微信