骗局与印尼法律体系中的法律确定性原则

Sholahuddin Al-Fatih, Z. Aditya
{"title":"骗局与印尼法律体系中的法律确定性原则","authors":"Sholahuddin Al-Fatih, Z. Aditya","doi":"10.4108/eai.13-2-2019.2286165","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"There is no doubt that legal certainty is one of the basic principles in a lawbased society. In fact, it can also be said that the principle of legal certainty is often considered synonymous with the rule of law itself. Thus, the principle of legal certainty has reached the character of universality. Problems arise when the principle of legal certainty is confronted in a concrete case. In the case of the spread of HOAX, for example, the principle of legal certainty is more widely used than the principle of legal justice. As a result, at present, many people are subjected to criminal penalties because law enforcers, especially court judges, prioritize legal certainty (as written in the law) rather than applying legal justice. In this case, this article will discuss critically the application of the principle of legal certainty in the Indonesian legal system. In particular, this article highlights the fact that in many cases the spread of deception, judges prioritize the approach of using the principle of legal certainty rather than seeking substantive legal justice from the case.","PeriodicalId":199842,"journal":{"name":"Proceedings of the Proceedings of the 1st International Conference on Business, Law And Pedagogy, ICBLP 2019, 13-15 February 2019, Sidoarjo, Indonesia","volume":"10 4","pages":"0"},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"1900-01-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"4","resultStr":"{\"title\":\"Hoax and The Principle of Legal Certainty in Indonesian Legal System\",\"authors\":\"Sholahuddin Al-Fatih, Z. Aditya\",\"doi\":\"10.4108/eai.13-2-2019.2286165\",\"DOIUrl\":null,\"url\":null,\"abstract\":\"There is no doubt that legal certainty is one of the basic principles in a lawbased society. In fact, it can also be said that the principle of legal certainty is often considered synonymous with the rule of law itself. Thus, the principle of legal certainty has reached the character of universality. Problems arise when the principle of legal certainty is confronted in a concrete case. In the case of the spread of HOAX, for example, the principle of legal certainty is more widely used than the principle of legal justice. As a result, at present, many people are subjected to criminal penalties because law enforcers, especially court judges, prioritize legal certainty (as written in the law) rather than applying legal justice. In this case, this article will discuss critically the application of the principle of legal certainty in the Indonesian legal system. In particular, this article highlights the fact that in many cases the spread of deception, judges prioritize the approach of using the principle of legal certainty rather than seeking substantive legal justice from the case.\",\"PeriodicalId\":199842,\"journal\":{\"name\":\"Proceedings of the Proceedings of the 1st International Conference on Business, Law And Pedagogy, ICBLP 2019, 13-15 February 2019, Sidoarjo, Indonesia\",\"volume\":\"10 4\",\"pages\":\"0\"},\"PeriodicalIF\":0.0000,\"publicationDate\":\"1900-01-01\",\"publicationTypes\":\"Journal Article\",\"fieldsOfStudy\":null,\"isOpenAccess\":false,\"openAccessPdf\":\"\",\"citationCount\":\"4\",\"resultStr\":null,\"platform\":\"Semanticscholar\",\"paperid\":null,\"PeriodicalName\":\"Proceedings of the Proceedings of the 1st International Conference on Business, Law And Pedagogy, ICBLP 2019, 13-15 February 2019, Sidoarjo, Indonesia\",\"FirstCategoryId\":\"1085\",\"ListUrlMain\":\"https://doi.org/10.4108/eai.13-2-2019.2286165\",\"RegionNum\":0,\"RegionCategory\":null,\"ArticlePicture\":[],\"TitleCN\":null,\"AbstractTextCN\":null,\"PMCID\":null,\"EPubDate\":\"\",\"PubModel\":\"\",\"JCR\":\"\",\"JCRName\":\"\",\"Score\":null,\"Total\":0}","platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Proceedings of the Proceedings of the 1st International Conference on Business, Law And Pedagogy, ICBLP 2019, 13-15 February 2019, Sidoarjo, Indonesia","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.4108/eai.13-2-2019.2286165","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"","JCRName":"","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 4

摘要

毫无疑问,法律确定性是法治社会的基本原则之一。事实上,也可以说,法律确定性原则往往被认为是法治本身的同义词。这样,法律确定性原则就具有了普遍性。当在具体案件中面对法律确定性原则时,问题就出现了。例如,在骗局的传播中,法律确定性原则比法律正义原则得到了更广泛的应用。因此,目前,许多人受到刑事处罚,因为执法者,特别是法院法官,优先考虑法律确定性(如法律所写),而不是适用法律正义。在这种情况下,本文将批判性地讨论印度尼西亚法律制度中法律确定性原则的适用。本文特别强调了这样一个事实,即在许多欺诈传播案件中,法官优先采用法律确定性原则的方法,而不是从案件中寻求实质性的法律正义。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
Hoax and The Principle of Legal Certainty in Indonesian Legal System
There is no doubt that legal certainty is one of the basic principles in a lawbased society. In fact, it can also be said that the principle of legal certainty is often considered synonymous with the rule of law itself. Thus, the principle of legal certainty has reached the character of universality. Problems arise when the principle of legal certainty is confronted in a concrete case. In the case of the spread of HOAX, for example, the principle of legal certainty is more widely used than the principle of legal justice. As a result, at present, many people are subjected to criminal penalties because law enforcers, especially court judges, prioritize legal certainty (as written in the law) rather than applying legal justice. In this case, this article will discuss critically the application of the principle of legal certainty in the Indonesian legal system. In particular, this article highlights the fact that in many cases the spread of deception, judges prioritize the approach of using the principle of legal certainty rather than seeking substantive legal justice from the case.
求助全文
通过发布文献求助,成功后即可免费获取论文全文。 去求助
来源期刊
自引率
0.00%
发文量
0
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:604180095
Book学术官方微信