《国家环境政策法》与气候变化:在基础设施审查过程中考虑气候缓解和适应问题

N. Ulibarri, David Han
{"title":"《国家环境政策法》与气候变化:在基础设施审查过程中考虑气候缓解和适应问题","authors":"N. Ulibarri, David Han","doi":"10.1088/2634-4505/ac5006","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"Addressing climate change requires a shift in the planning, design, and operations of infrastructure. Reducing greenhouse gas emissions will require decarbonizing energy, water, transportation, and other infrastructures. And the long-term resilience of many infrastructure projects will be affected by expected changes in precipitation, sea level, heat and cold spells, and natural hazards like hurricanes and wildfires. Many scholars and practitioners have suggested that environmental impact assessment (EIA)—a required review of the environmental impacts of infrastructure projects—can serve as an opportunity to encourage infrastructure to be more climate friendly. In the United States (like many other jurisdictions), federal agencies are not required to address climate change in EIA reviews, but guidance from the Council on Environmental Quality advises them to consider greenhouse gas emissions and the effects of climate change. This paper applied qualitative content analysis to assess integration of climate change into environmental impact statements (EISs) in the United States. We found that most EISs included some consideration of climate change, most frequently with a few brief mentions rather than extensive integration. We also found more focus on climate mitigation than adaptation, in both recognizing potential impacts and managing those impacts. Surprisingly, infrastructure that is more directly related to climate change—water and energy infrastructure, as well as land management—had lower overall climate integration than transportation, information technology, or buildings and operations. As exploratory work, this research suggests that federal agencies could do more to mitigate greenhouse gas emissions in approved projects and in particular to make infrastructure more adaptive to climate change. The work also raises a number of questions as to whether EIA is the right regulatory tool to encourage climate friendly infrastructure.","PeriodicalId":309041,"journal":{"name":"Environmental Research: Infrastructure and Sustainability","volume":"100 1","pages":"0"},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"2022-01-28","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"6","resultStr":"{\"title\":\"NEPA and climate change: consideration of climate mitigation and adaptation in infrastructure review processes\",\"authors\":\"N. Ulibarri, David Han\",\"doi\":\"10.1088/2634-4505/ac5006\",\"DOIUrl\":null,\"url\":null,\"abstract\":\"Addressing climate change requires a shift in the planning, design, and operations of infrastructure. Reducing greenhouse gas emissions will require decarbonizing energy, water, transportation, and other infrastructures. And the long-term resilience of many infrastructure projects will be affected by expected changes in precipitation, sea level, heat and cold spells, and natural hazards like hurricanes and wildfires. Many scholars and practitioners have suggested that environmental impact assessment (EIA)—a required review of the environmental impacts of infrastructure projects—can serve as an opportunity to encourage infrastructure to be more climate friendly. In the United States (like many other jurisdictions), federal agencies are not required to address climate change in EIA reviews, but guidance from the Council on Environmental Quality advises them to consider greenhouse gas emissions and the effects of climate change. This paper applied qualitative content analysis to assess integration of climate change into environmental impact statements (EISs) in the United States. We found that most EISs included some consideration of climate change, most frequently with a few brief mentions rather than extensive integration. We also found more focus on climate mitigation than adaptation, in both recognizing potential impacts and managing those impacts. Surprisingly, infrastructure that is more directly related to climate change—water and energy infrastructure, as well as land management—had lower overall climate integration than transportation, information technology, or buildings and operations. As exploratory work, this research suggests that federal agencies could do more to mitigate greenhouse gas emissions in approved projects and in particular to make infrastructure more adaptive to climate change. The work also raises a number of questions as to whether EIA is the right regulatory tool to encourage climate friendly infrastructure.\",\"PeriodicalId\":309041,\"journal\":{\"name\":\"Environmental Research: Infrastructure and Sustainability\",\"volume\":\"100 1\",\"pages\":\"0\"},\"PeriodicalIF\":0.0000,\"publicationDate\":\"2022-01-28\",\"publicationTypes\":\"Journal Article\",\"fieldsOfStudy\":null,\"isOpenAccess\":false,\"openAccessPdf\":\"\",\"citationCount\":\"6\",\"resultStr\":null,\"platform\":\"Semanticscholar\",\"paperid\":null,\"PeriodicalName\":\"Environmental Research: Infrastructure and Sustainability\",\"FirstCategoryId\":\"1085\",\"ListUrlMain\":\"https://doi.org/10.1088/2634-4505/ac5006\",\"RegionNum\":0,\"RegionCategory\":null,\"ArticlePicture\":[],\"TitleCN\":null,\"AbstractTextCN\":null,\"PMCID\":null,\"EPubDate\":\"\",\"PubModel\":\"\",\"JCR\":\"\",\"JCRName\":\"\",\"Score\":null,\"Total\":0}","platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Environmental Research: Infrastructure and Sustainability","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1088/2634-4505/ac5006","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"","JCRName":"","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 6

摘要

应对气候变化需要在基础设施的规划、设计和运营方面做出转变。减少温室气体排放需要使能源、水、交通和其他基础设施脱碳。许多基础设施项目的长期恢复能力将受到降水、海平面、冷热期以及飓风和野火等自然灾害的预期变化的影响。许多学者和实践者建议,环境影响评估(EIA)——对基础设施项目环境影响的必要审查——可以作为鼓励基础设施更加气候友好的机会。在美国(像许多其他司法管辖区一样),联邦机构没有被要求在环境影响评估中处理气候变化问题,但环境质量委员会的指导建议他们考虑温室气体排放和气候变化的影响。本文采用定性内容分析方法对美国将气候变化纳入环境影响报告书进行了评估。我们发现,大多数eis都包含了对气候变化的一些考虑,最常见的是简短的提及,而不是广泛的整合。我们还发现,在认识潜在影响和管理这些影响方面,更注重减缓气候变化,而不是适应气候变化。令人惊讶的是,与气候变化更直接相关的基础设施——水和能源基础设施以及土地管理——总体气候一体化程度低于交通、信息技术或建筑和运营。作为探索性工作,这项研究表明,联邦机构可以在已批准的项目中采取更多措施来减少温室气体排放,特别是使基础设施更能适应气候变化。这项工作还提出了一些问题,即环境影响评估是否是鼓励气候友好型基础设施的正确监管工具。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
NEPA and climate change: consideration of climate mitigation and adaptation in infrastructure review processes
Addressing climate change requires a shift in the planning, design, and operations of infrastructure. Reducing greenhouse gas emissions will require decarbonizing energy, water, transportation, and other infrastructures. And the long-term resilience of many infrastructure projects will be affected by expected changes in precipitation, sea level, heat and cold spells, and natural hazards like hurricanes and wildfires. Many scholars and practitioners have suggested that environmental impact assessment (EIA)—a required review of the environmental impacts of infrastructure projects—can serve as an opportunity to encourage infrastructure to be more climate friendly. In the United States (like many other jurisdictions), federal agencies are not required to address climate change in EIA reviews, but guidance from the Council on Environmental Quality advises them to consider greenhouse gas emissions and the effects of climate change. This paper applied qualitative content analysis to assess integration of climate change into environmental impact statements (EISs) in the United States. We found that most EISs included some consideration of climate change, most frequently with a few brief mentions rather than extensive integration. We also found more focus on climate mitigation than adaptation, in both recognizing potential impacts and managing those impacts. Surprisingly, infrastructure that is more directly related to climate change—water and energy infrastructure, as well as land management—had lower overall climate integration than transportation, information technology, or buildings and operations. As exploratory work, this research suggests that federal agencies could do more to mitigate greenhouse gas emissions in approved projects and in particular to make infrastructure more adaptive to climate change. The work also raises a number of questions as to whether EIA is the right regulatory tool to encourage climate friendly infrastructure.
求助全文
通过发布文献求助,成功后即可免费获取论文全文。 去求助
来源期刊
自引率
0.00%
发文量
0
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术官方微信