评价不丹廷布市提供的不同洗手液的抗菌效果

Vishal Chhetri, S. Jamtsho, Kelzang Wangdi, Sonam Gyeltshen, T. Dorji, Amin Ngawang Tashi
{"title":"评价不丹廷布市提供的不同洗手液的抗菌效果","authors":"Vishal Chhetri, S. Jamtsho, Kelzang Wangdi, Sonam Gyeltshen, T. Dorji, Amin Ngawang Tashi","doi":"10.47811/bhj.138","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"Introduction: Hand washing and the use of alcohol based hand-rub are two effective hand-hygiene procedures. Though the compliance to hand washing was relatively low, the COVID-19 pandemic situation has drastically increased the use of hand sanitizers. Thus, many hand sanitizer brands have entered the market and this study was taken up to assess the microbial efficacy of different types of hand sanitizers available in Thimphu.\nMethods: Ten gel based and ten liquid hand sanitizers were collected from various retail pharmacy shops in Thimphu during first quarter of 2020. Laboratory based experiment was performed using standard organism; Gram Negative Bacteria (GNB) Escherichia coli (American Type Culture Collection 25922) and Pseudomonas aurigenosa (American Type Culture Collection 27853), Gram Positive Bacteria (GPB) Staphylococcus aureus (American Type Culture Collection 25923) and a cocktail of GNB and GPC. The efficacy of hand sanitizer was assessed with the size of the Zone of Inhibition (ZoI).\nResults: The hand sanitizers were found to be effective against all strains of micro organism but with differentsize of ZoI. The maximum size of Zone of Inhibition was observed by sample N and Q (ZoI diameter 33.0±0.14mm) for American Type Culture Collection 25923. The Zone of Inhibition of liquid base hand sanitizers was significantly higher than that of gel base (p<0.05).\nConclusions: The study presents that liquid base alcohol based hand sanitizer is more efficient than the gel form.","PeriodicalId":410038,"journal":{"name":"Bhutan Health Journal","volume":"80 1","pages":"0"},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"2022-08-15","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":"{\"title\":\"Evaluation of antimicrobial efficacy of different hand sanitizers available in Thimphu, Bhutan\",\"authors\":\"Vishal Chhetri, S. Jamtsho, Kelzang Wangdi, Sonam Gyeltshen, T. Dorji, Amin Ngawang Tashi\",\"doi\":\"10.47811/bhj.138\",\"DOIUrl\":null,\"url\":null,\"abstract\":\"Introduction: Hand washing and the use of alcohol based hand-rub are two effective hand-hygiene procedures. Though the compliance to hand washing was relatively low, the COVID-19 pandemic situation has drastically increased the use of hand sanitizers. Thus, many hand sanitizer brands have entered the market and this study was taken up to assess the microbial efficacy of different types of hand sanitizers available in Thimphu.\\nMethods: Ten gel based and ten liquid hand sanitizers were collected from various retail pharmacy shops in Thimphu during first quarter of 2020. Laboratory based experiment was performed using standard organism; Gram Negative Bacteria (GNB) Escherichia coli (American Type Culture Collection 25922) and Pseudomonas aurigenosa (American Type Culture Collection 27853), Gram Positive Bacteria (GPB) Staphylococcus aureus (American Type Culture Collection 25923) and a cocktail of GNB and GPC. The efficacy of hand sanitizer was assessed with the size of the Zone of Inhibition (ZoI).\\nResults: The hand sanitizers were found to be effective against all strains of micro organism but with differentsize of ZoI. The maximum size of Zone of Inhibition was observed by sample N and Q (ZoI diameter 33.0±0.14mm) for American Type Culture Collection 25923. The Zone of Inhibition of liquid base hand sanitizers was significantly higher than that of gel base (p<0.05).\\nConclusions: The study presents that liquid base alcohol based hand sanitizer is more efficient than the gel form.\",\"PeriodicalId\":410038,\"journal\":{\"name\":\"Bhutan Health Journal\",\"volume\":\"80 1\",\"pages\":\"0\"},\"PeriodicalIF\":0.0000,\"publicationDate\":\"2022-08-15\",\"publicationTypes\":\"Journal Article\",\"fieldsOfStudy\":null,\"isOpenAccess\":false,\"openAccessPdf\":\"\",\"citationCount\":\"0\",\"resultStr\":null,\"platform\":\"Semanticscholar\",\"paperid\":null,\"PeriodicalName\":\"Bhutan Health Journal\",\"FirstCategoryId\":\"1085\",\"ListUrlMain\":\"https://doi.org/10.47811/bhj.138\",\"RegionNum\":0,\"RegionCategory\":null,\"ArticlePicture\":[],\"TitleCN\":null,\"AbstractTextCN\":null,\"PMCID\":null,\"EPubDate\":\"\",\"PubModel\":\"\",\"JCR\":\"\",\"JCRName\":\"\",\"Score\":null,\"Total\":0}","platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Bhutan Health Journal","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.47811/bhj.138","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"","JCRName":"","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

摘要

介绍:洗手和使用含酒精的洗手液是两种有效的手卫生程序。虽然洗手的依从性相对较低,但新冠肺炎疫情大大增加了洗手液的使用。因此,许多洗手液品牌进入了市场,本研究旨在评估廷布市不同类型洗手液的微生物功效。方法:于2020年第一季度在廷布市各零售药店收集10种凝胶型洗手液和10种液体洗手液。采用标准生物进行实验室基础实验;革兰氏阴性菌(GNB)大肠杆菌(美国型培养收集25922)和金黄色假单胞菌(美国型培养收集27853),革兰氏阳性菌(GPB)金黄色葡萄球菌(美国型培养收集25923)和GNB和GPC的混合物。用抑制区(ZoI)的大小来评价洗手液的效果。结果:该洗手液对各种微生物均有良好的抑菌效果,但对不同大小的细菌有不同的抑菌效果。美国型培养25923以样品N和Q (ZoI直径33.0±0.14mm)观察最大抑制区大小。液基洗手液的抑制区显著高于凝胶基洗手液(p<0.05)。结论:本研究表明液基酒精型洗手液比凝胶型洗手液更有效。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
Evaluation of antimicrobial efficacy of different hand sanitizers available in Thimphu, Bhutan
Introduction: Hand washing and the use of alcohol based hand-rub are two effective hand-hygiene procedures. Though the compliance to hand washing was relatively low, the COVID-19 pandemic situation has drastically increased the use of hand sanitizers. Thus, many hand sanitizer brands have entered the market and this study was taken up to assess the microbial efficacy of different types of hand sanitizers available in Thimphu. Methods: Ten gel based and ten liquid hand sanitizers were collected from various retail pharmacy shops in Thimphu during first quarter of 2020. Laboratory based experiment was performed using standard organism; Gram Negative Bacteria (GNB) Escherichia coli (American Type Culture Collection 25922) and Pseudomonas aurigenosa (American Type Culture Collection 27853), Gram Positive Bacteria (GPB) Staphylococcus aureus (American Type Culture Collection 25923) and a cocktail of GNB and GPC. The efficacy of hand sanitizer was assessed with the size of the Zone of Inhibition (ZoI). Results: The hand sanitizers were found to be effective against all strains of micro organism but with differentsize of ZoI. The maximum size of Zone of Inhibition was observed by sample N and Q (ZoI diameter 33.0±0.14mm) for American Type Culture Collection 25923. The Zone of Inhibition of liquid base hand sanitizers was significantly higher than that of gel base (p<0.05). Conclusions: The study presents that liquid base alcohol based hand sanitizer is more efficient than the gel form.
求助全文
通过发布文献求助,成功后即可免费获取论文全文。 去求助
来源期刊
自引率
0.00%
发文量
0
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术官方微信