国家对人权要求的支持

D. Bederman
{"title":"国家对人权要求的支持","authors":"D. Bederman","doi":"10.2139/SSRN.1832718","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"This short symposium piece examines the use of diplomatic protection and state-to-state espousal of human rights claims. Espousal occurs where a government takes up a claim on behalf of an aggrieved national and presents the claim to another State that was the author of the injury. There is a growing body of international practice (including that of the United States) to allow such claims to be presented in certain circumstances. While such a right to espousal remains permissive, some domestic courts are moving in the direction of holding that such espousals should not be unreasonably or capriciously refused. For the United States, it is highly unlikely that this approach will be adopted, but espousals may continue to be employed, and human rights claims presented, in appropriate cases.","PeriodicalId":107284,"journal":{"name":"Emory University School of Law","volume":"13 1","pages":"0"},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"2011-04-05","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"3","resultStr":"{\"title\":\"State-to-State Espousal of Human Rights Claims\",\"authors\":\"D. Bederman\",\"doi\":\"10.2139/SSRN.1832718\",\"DOIUrl\":null,\"url\":null,\"abstract\":\"This short symposium piece examines the use of diplomatic protection and state-to-state espousal of human rights claims. Espousal occurs where a government takes up a claim on behalf of an aggrieved national and presents the claim to another State that was the author of the injury. There is a growing body of international practice (including that of the United States) to allow such claims to be presented in certain circumstances. While such a right to espousal remains permissive, some domestic courts are moving in the direction of holding that such espousals should not be unreasonably or capriciously refused. For the United States, it is highly unlikely that this approach will be adopted, but espousals may continue to be employed, and human rights claims presented, in appropriate cases.\",\"PeriodicalId\":107284,\"journal\":{\"name\":\"Emory University School of Law\",\"volume\":\"13 1\",\"pages\":\"0\"},\"PeriodicalIF\":0.0000,\"publicationDate\":\"2011-04-05\",\"publicationTypes\":\"Journal Article\",\"fieldsOfStudy\":null,\"isOpenAccess\":false,\"openAccessPdf\":\"\",\"citationCount\":\"3\",\"resultStr\":null,\"platform\":\"Semanticscholar\",\"paperid\":null,\"PeriodicalName\":\"Emory University School of Law\",\"FirstCategoryId\":\"1085\",\"ListUrlMain\":\"https://doi.org/10.2139/SSRN.1832718\",\"RegionNum\":0,\"RegionCategory\":null,\"ArticlePicture\":[],\"TitleCN\":null,\"AbstractTextCN\":null,\"PMCID\":null,\"EPubDate\":\"\",\"PubModel\":\"\",\"JCR\":\"\",\"JCRName\":\"\",\"Score\":null,\"Total\":0}","platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Emory University School of Law","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.2139/SSRN.1832718","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"","JCRName":"","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 3

摘要

这篇简短的专题讨论会文章探讨了外交保护的使用和国与国之间对人权主张的支持。申诉是指一国政府代表受损害的国民提出索赔,并向造成损害的另一国家提出索赔。越来越多的国际惯例(包括美国的惯例)允许在某些情况下提出这种要求。虽然这种婚姻权利仍然是允许的,但一些国内法院正倾向于认为不应无理或反复拒绝这种婚姻权利。对美国来说,采取这种做法的可能性很小,但在适当的情况下,可能会继续采用支持,并提出人权要求。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
State-to-State Espousal of Human Rights Claims
This short symposium piece examines the use of diplomatic protection and state-to-state espousal of human rights claims. Espousal occurs where a government takes up a claim on behalf of an aggrieved national and presents the claim to another State that was the author of the injury. There is a growing body of international practice (including that of the United States) to allow such claims to be presented in certain circumstances. While such a right to espousal remains permissive, some domestic courts are moving in the direction of holding that such espousals should not be unreasonably or capriciously refused. For the United States, it is highly unlikely that this approach will be adopted, but espousals may continue to be employed, and human rights claims presented, in appropriate cases.
求助全文
通过发布文献求助,成功后即可免费获取论文全文。 去求助
来源期刊
自引率
0.00%
发文量
0
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:604180095
Book学术官方微信