柯林伍德《艺术原理》的理论潜力:现代诠释的经验

M. Ternova
{"title":"柯林伍德《艺术原理》的理论潜力:现代诠释的经验","authors":"M. Ternova","doi":"10.37627/2311-9489-16-2019-2.72-80","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"The article, based on R. G. Collingwood’s monograph Principles of Art (1938), reconstructs the theoretical space of the English humanities of the time. It shows that in his work, R. G. Collingwood, a well-known English neo-Hegelian philosopher and historian of science, substantiated the aesthetic-psychological concept of art, which proved to be in line with modern philosophical and aesthetic-psychological search for scientists. The article highlights the most promising clauses on the psychological essence of art, which should be considered in the logic of attribution of modern theoretical models, and offers the author’s interpretation of Collingwood’s ideas, in the context of which the emphasis is placed on the role of English theorists in the development of interdisciplinarity as one of the cornerstones of cultural analysis. The research emphasizes the importance of historical and cultural traditions and actualizes their potential during the period of avant-garde formation. Concidering the theoretical ideas of R. G. Collingwood, the following aesthetic art problems are conceptualized: “psychic expression”, “sensuality” and “multiplicity of aesthetics”.","PeriodicalId":338481,"journal":{"name":"The Culturology Ideas","volume":"11 1","pages":"0"},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"1900-01-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":"{\"title\":\"The Theoretical Potential of the R. G. Collingwood’s Principles of Arts: the Experience of Modern Interpretation\",\"authors\":\"M. Ternova\",\"doi\":\"10.37627/2311-9489-16-2019-2.72-80\",\"DOIUrl\":null,\"url\":null,\"abstract\":\"The article, based on R. G. Collingwood’s monograph Principles of Art (1938), reconstructs the theoretical space of the English humanities of the time. It shows that in his work, R. G. Collingwood, a well-known English neo-Hegelian philosopher and historian of science, substantiated the aesthetic-psychological concept of art, which proved to be in line with modern philosophical and aesthetic-psychological search for scientists. The article highlights the most promising clauses on the psychological essence of art, which should be considered in the logic of attribution of modern theoretical models, and offers the author’s interpretation of Collingwood’s ideas, in the context of which the emphasis is placed on the role of English theorists in the development of interdisciplinarity as one of the cornerstones of cultural analysis. The research emphasizes the importance of historical and cultural traditions and actualizes their potential during the period of avant-garde formation. Concidering the theoretical ideas of R. G. Collingwood, the following aesthetic art problems are conceptualized: “psychic expression”, “sensuality” and “multiplicity of aesthetics”.\",\"PeriodicalId\":338481,\"journal\":{\"name\":\"The Culturology Ideas\",\"volume\":\"11 1\",\"pages\":\"0\"},\"PeriodicalIF\":0.0000,\"publicationDate\":\"1900-01-01\",\"publicationTypes\":\"Journal Article\",\"fieldsOfStudy\":null,\"isOpenAccess\":false,\"openAccessPdf\":\"\",\"citationCount\":\"0\",\"resultStr\":null,\"platform\":\"Semanticscholar\",\"paperid\":null,\"PeriodicalName\":\"The Culturology Ideas\",\"FirstCategoryId\":\"1085\",\"ListUrlMain\":\"https://doi.org/10.37627/2311-9489-16-2019-2.72-80\",\"RegionNum\":0,\"RegionCategory\":null,\"ArticlePicture\":[],\"TitleCN\":null,\"AbstractTextCN\":null,\"PMCID\":null,\"EPubDate\":\"\",\"PubModel\":\"\",\"JCR\":\"\",\"JCRName\":\"\",\"Score\":null,\"Total\":0}","platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"The Culturology Ideas","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.37627/2311-9489-16-2019-2.72-80","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"","JCRName":"","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

摘要

本文以柯林伍德的专著《艺术原理》(Principles of Art, 1938)为基础,重构了当时英国人文学科的理论空间。这表明,英国著名的新黑格尔主义哲学家、科学史家柯林伍德在他的作品中证实了艺术的审美心理概念,这与现代哲学和科学家的审美心理探索是一致的。文章强调了在现代理论模型的归因逻辑中应该考虑的艺术心理本质的最有希望的条款,并对科林伍德的思想进行了解释,重点是英国理论家在跨学科发展中的作用,作为文化分析的基石之一。该研究强调历史文化传统的重要性,并在先锋形成时期发挥其潜力。结合柯林伍德的理论思想,将“精神表达”、“感性”和“美学的多样性”等美学艺术问题概念化。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
The Theoretical Potential of the R. G. Collingwood’s Principles of Arts: the Experience of Modern Interpretation
The article, based on R. G. Collingwood’s monograph Principles of Art (1938), reconstructs the theoretical space of the English humanities of the time. It shows that in his work, R. G. Collingwood, a well-known English neo-Hegelian philosopher and historian of science, substantiated the aesthetic-psychological concept of art, which proved to be in line with modern philosophical and aesthetic-psychological search for scientists. The article highlights the most promising clauses on the psychological essence of art, which should be considered in the logic of attribution of modern theoretical models, and offers the author’s interpretation of Collingwood’s ideas, in the context of which the emphasis is placed on the role of English theorists in the development of interdisciplinarity as one of the cornerstones of cultural analysis. The research emphasizes the importance of historical and cultural traditions and actualizes their potential during the period of avant-garde formation. Concidering the theoretical ideas of R. G. Collingwood, the following aesthetic art problems are conceptualized: “psychic expression”, “sensuality” and “multiplicity of aesthetics”.
求助全文
通过发布文献求助,成功后即可免费获取论文全文。 去求助
来源期刊
自引率
0.00%
发文量
0
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术官方微信