构建投入产出的跨部门创新扩散网络:如何获得相对流动?90年代中期六个经合组织技术系统的实例应用

Sandro Montresor, Giuseppe Vittucci Marzetti
{"title":"构建投入产出的跨部门创新扩散网络:如何获得相对流动?90年代中期六个经合组织技术系统的实例应用","authors":"Sandro Montresor, Giuseppe Vittucci Marzetti","doi":"10.2139/ssrn.994340","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"The paper aims at addressing some methodological issues in applying Social Network Analysis indicators to the investigation of nation-wide intersectoral innovation ows matrices. The majority of SNA techniques require dichotomization of the original matrices and suitable relativization procedures, in order to avoid size-biases. The relativization procedures used so far suffer from some limitations, as they either alter the meaning of SNA indicators or do not take into account the composition of countries' final demand. In order to overcome these limitations, we propose two new different methods and compare them with the existing ones on the basis of their rationale. Rather than with respect to a single cut-off, the comparison is carried out by working out SNA indicators distributions. An illustrative application is carried out by comparing the technological systems of six structurally different OECD countries in the mid-'90s. In so doing, the robustness of their conventional innovation ranking is tested and discussed.","PeriodicalId":338013,"journal":{"name":"ERPN: Innovation (Economic) (Sub-Topic)","volume":"141 1","pages":"0"},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"2007-06-05","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"7","resultStr":"{\"title\":\"Constructing Intersectoral Innovation Diffusion Networks with Input-Output: How to Get Relative Flows? An Illustrative Application to Six OECD Technological Systems for the Middle '90s\",\"authors\":\"Sandro Montresor, Giuseppe Vittucci Marzetti\",\"doi\":\"10.2139/ssrn.994340\",\"DOIUrl\":null,\"url\":null,\"abstract\":\"The paper aims at addressing some methodological issues in applying Social Network Analysis indicators to the investigation of nation-wide intersectoral innovation ows matrices. The majority of SNA techniques require dichotomization of the original matrices and suitable relativization procedures, in order to avoid size-biases. The relativization procedures used so far suffer from some limitations, as they either alter the meaning of SNA indicators or do not take into account the composition of countries' final demand. In order to overcome these limitations, we propose two new different methods and compare them with the existing ones on the basis of their rationale. Rather than with respect to a single cut-off, the comparison is carried out by working out SNA indicators distributions. An illustrative application is carried out by comparing the technological systems of six structurally different OECD countries in the mid-'90s. In so doing, the robustness of their conventional innovation ranking is tested and discussed.\",\"PeriodicalId\":338013,\"journal\":{\"name\":\"ERPN: Innovation (Economic) (Sub-Topic)\",\"volume\":\"141 1\",\"pages\":\"0\"},\"PeriodicalIF\":0.0000,\"publicationDate\":\"2007-06-05\",\"publicationTypes\":\"Journal Article\",\"fieldsOfStudy\":null,\"isOpenAccess\":false,\"openAccessPdf\":\"\",\"citationCount\":\"7\",\"resultStr\":null,\"platform\":\"Semanticscholar\",\"paperid\":null,\"PeriodicalName\":\"ERPN: Innovation (Economic) (Sub-Topic)\",\"FirstCategoryId\":\"1085\",\"ListUrlMain\":\"https://doi.org/10.2139/ssrn.994340\",\"RegionNum\":0,\"RegionCategory\":null,\"ArticlePicture\":[],\"TitleCN\":null,\"AbstractTextCN\":null,\"PMCID\":null,\"EPubDate\":\"\",\"PubModel\":\"\",\"JCR\":\"\",\"JCRName\":\"\",\"Score\":null,\"Total\":0}","platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"ERPN: Innovation (Economic) (Sub-Topic)","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.2139/ssrn.994340","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"","JCRName":"","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 7

摘要

本文旨在解决将社会网络分析指标应用于全国跨部门创新矩阵调查中的一些方法问题。大多数SNA技术需要对原始矩阵进行二分类和适当的相对化处理,以避免大小偏差。迄今使用的相对化程序有一些局限性,因为它们要么改变国民核算体系指标的含义,要么没有考虑到各国最终需求的构成。为了克服这些局限性,我们提出了两种不同的新方法,并在其基本原理的基础上与现有方法进行了比较。通过计算SNA指标分布来进行比较,而不是相对于单一截止。通过比较90年代中期六个结构不同的经合组织国家的技术系统,进行了一个说明性应用。在此过程中,对传统创新排名的稳健性进行了检验和讨论。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
Constructing Intersectoral Innovation Diffusion Networks with Input-Output: How to Get Relative Flows? An Illustrative Application to Six OECD Technological Systems for the Middle '90s
The paper aims at addressing some methodological issues in applying Social Network Analysis indicators to the investigation of nation-wide intersectoral innovation ows matrices. The majority of SNA techniques require dichotomization of the original matrices and suitable relativization procedures, in order to avoid size-biases. The relativization procedures used so far suffer from some limitations, as they either alter the meaning of SNA indicators or do not take into account the composition of countries' final demand. In order to overcome these limitations, we propose two new different methods and compare them with the existing ones on the basis of their rationale. Rather than with respect to a single cut-off, the comparison is carried out by working out SNA indicators distributions. An illustrative application is carried out by comparing the technological systems of six structurally different OECD countries in the mid-'90s. In so doing, the robustness of their conventional innovation ranking is tested and discussed.
求助全文
通过发布文献求助,成功后即可免费获取论文全文。 去求助
来源期刊
自引率
0.00%
发文量
0
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术官方微信