基于MVV估计的鲁棒马氏距离的高效计算

H. Ali, S. Soaad, S. Yahaya, Z. Omar
{"title":"基于MVV估计的鲁棒马氏距离的高效计算","authors":"H. Ali, S. Soaad, S. Yahaya, Z. Omar","doi":"10.1109/ISMSC.2015.7594076","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"MCD is a well-known multivariate robust estimator. However, the computation of the estimator is not simple especially for large sample size due to the complexity of the objective function i.e. minimizing covariance determinant. Recently, an alternative objective function which is simpler and faster was introduced. The objective function is to minimize vector variance, which consequently will generate the estimator known as minimum vector variance (MVV). In this paper, a simulation study was conducted to compare the computational efficiency of the two estimators with regards to the number of operations in the computation of objective function and also iterations of the algorithm to convergence. The result showed that the computational efficiency of MVV is higher than MCD for small or large data set.","PeriodicalId":407600,"journal":{"name":"2015 International Symposium on Mathematical Sciences and Computing Research (iSMSC)","volume":"47 1","pages":"0"},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"2015-05-19","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"1","resultStr":"{\"title\":\"A computationally efficient of robust mahalanobis distance based on MVV estimator\",\"authors\":\"H. Ali, S. Soaad, S. Yahaya, Z. Omar\",\"doi\":\"10.1109/ISMSC.2015.7594076\",\"DOIUrl\":null,\"url\":null,\"abstract\":\"MCD is a well-known multivariate robust estimator. However, the computation of the estimator is not simple especially for large sample size due to the complexity of the objective function i.e. minimizing covariance determinant. Recently, an alternative objective function which is simpler and faster was introduced. The objective function is to minimize vector variance, which consequently will generate the estimator known as minimum vector variance (MVV). In this paper, a simulation study was conducted to compare the computational efficiency of the two estimators with regards to the number of operations in the computation of objective function and also iterations of the algorithm to convergence. The result showed that the computational efficiency of MVV is higher than MCD for small or large data set.\",\"PeriodicalId\":407600,\"journal\":{\"name\":\"2015 International Symposium on Mathematical Sciences and Computing Research (iSMSC)\",\"volume\":\"47 1\",\"pages\":\"0\"},\"PeriodicalIF\":0.0000,\"publicationDate\":\"2015-05-19\",\"publicationTypes\":\"Journal Article\",\"fieldsOfStudy\":null,\"isOpenAccess\":false,\"openAccessPdf\":\"\",\"citationCount\":\"1\",\"resultStr\":null,\"platform\":\"Semanticscholar\",\"paperid\":null,\"PeriodicalName\":\"2015 International Symposium on Mathematical Sciences and Computing Research (iSMSC)\",\"FirstCategoryId\":\"1085\",\"ListUrlMain\":\"https://doi.org/10.1109/ISMSC.2015.7594076\",\"RegionNum\":0,\"RegionCategory\":null,\"ArticlePicture\":[],\"TitleCN\":null,\"AbstractTextCN\":null,\"PMCID\":null,\"EPubDate\":\"\",\"PubModel\":\"\",\"JCR\":\"\",\"JCRName\":\"\",\"Score\":null,\"Total\":0}","platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"2015 International Symposium on Mathematical Sciences and Computing Research (iSMSC)","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1109/ISMSC.2015.7594076","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"","JCRName":"","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 1

摘要

MCD是一个众所周知的多元鲁棒估计。然而,由于目标函数即最小化协方差行列式的复杂性,估计量的计算并不简单,特别是对于大样本量。最近,又提出了一种更简单、更快的目标函数。目标函数是最小化向量方差,从而产生最小向量方差(MVV)估计器。本文通过仿真研究,比较了两种估计器在目标函数计算中的运算次数和算法收敛的迭代次数方面的计算效率。结果表明,无论对大数据集还是小数据集,MVV算法的计算效率都高于MCD算法。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
A computationally efficient of robust mahalanobis distance based on MVV estimator
MCD is a well-known multivariate robust estimator. However, the computation of the estimator is not simple especially for large sample size due to the complexity of the objective function i.e. minimizing covariance determinant. Recently, an alternative objective function which is simpler and faster was introduced. The objective function is to minimize vector variance, which consequently will generate the estimator known as minimum vector variance (MVV). In this paper, a simulation study was conducted to compare the computational efficiency of the two estimators with regards to the number of operations in the computation of objective function and also iterations of the algorithm to convergence. The result showed that the computational efficiency of MVV is higher than MCD for small or large data set.
求助全文
通过发布文献求助,成功后即可免费获取论文全文。 去求助
来源期刊
自引率
0.00%
发文量
0
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:604180095
Book学术官方微信