心肌和骨骼肌收缩时间的比较:与心肌成形术的相关性

J. Shea, M.P. Cruz, T. Delosso, S. Binder-Macleod, D. T. George, W. Santamore
{"title":"心肌和骨骼肌收缩时间的比较:与心肌成形术的相关性","authors":"J. Shea, M.P. Cruz, T. Delosso, S. Binder-Macleod, D. T. George, W. Santamore","doi":"10.1109/NEBC.1993.404433","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"A study comparing the timing of myocardial and skeletal muscle contraction is discussed. In 6 normal dogs latissimus dorsi muscle (LDM) contraction times were derived from LDM force and shortening measurements. The LDM was stimulated with a 5 pulse variable frequency pulse train (VFT) and a 6 pulse constant frequency pulse train (CFT). With 6 pulse CFT stimulation, the LDM time to peak shortening and total contraction times were 292.5 /spl plusmn/ 27.9 and 456.0 /spl plusmn/ 18.8 in the fresh muscle. With 5 pulse VFT stimulation, the LDM time to peak shortening and total contraction times were 242.5 /spl plusmn/ 17.6 and 395.5 /spl plusmn/ 8.7. Thus, in normal skeletal muscle (i.e., both slow type I fibers and fast type II fibers) contraction times may exceed left ventricular electromechanical contraction times (420 to 294 ms for heart rates from 60 to 120 beats/minute). This prolonged LDM contraction may impede diastolic filling of the left ventricle. Variable frequency stimulation decreases LDM contraction times and thus might prevent this filling impairment.<<ETX>>","PeriodicalId":159783,"journal":{"name":"1993 IEEE Annual Northeast Bioengineering Conference","volume":"64 1","pages":"0"},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"1993-03-18","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":"{\"title\":\"Comparison of cardiac and skeletal muscle contraction times: relevance to cardiomyoplasty\",\"authors\":\"J. Shea, M.P. Cruz, T. Delosso, S. Binder-Macleod, D. T. George, W. Santamore\",\"doi\":\"10.1109/NEBC.1993.404433\",\"DOIUrl\":null,\"url\":null,\"abstract\":\"A study comparing the timing of myocardial and skeletal muscle contraction is discussed. In 6 normal dogs latissimus dorsi muscle (LDM) contraction times were derived from LDM force and shortening measurements. The LDM was stimulated with a 5 pulse variable frequency pulse train (VFT) and a 6 pulse constant frequency pulse train (CFT). With 6 pulse CFT stimulation, the LDM time to peak shortening and total contraction times were 292.5 /spl plusmn/ 27.9 and 456.0 /spl plusmn/ 18.8 in the fresh muscle. With 5 pulse VFT stimulation, the LDM time to peak shortening and total contraction times were 242.5 /spl plusmn/ 17.6 and 395.5 /spl plusmn/ 8.7. Thus, in normal skeletal muscle (i.e., both slow type I fibers and fast type II fibers) contraction times may exceed left ventricular electromechanical contraction times (420 to 294 ms for heart rates from 60 to 120 beats/minute). This prolonged LDM contraction may impede diastolic filling of the left ventricle. Variable frequency stimulation decreases LDM contraction times and thus might prevent this filling impairment.<<ETX>>\",\"PeriodicalId\":159783,\"journal\":{\"name\":\"1993 IEEE Annual Northeast Bioengineering Conference\",\"volume\":\"64 1\",\"pages\":\"0\"},\"PeriodicalIF\":0.0000,\"publicationDate\":\"1993-03-18\",\"publicationTypes\":\"Journal Article\",\"fieldsOfStudy\":null,\"isOpenAccess\":false,\"openAccessPdf\":\"\",\"citationCount\":\"0\",\"resultStr\":null,\"platform\":\"Semanticscholar\",\"paperid\":null,\"PeriodicalName\":\"1993 IEEE Annual Northeast Bioengineering Conference\",\"FirstCategoryId\":\"1085\",\"ListUrlMain\":\"https://doi.org/10.1109/NEBC.1993.404433\",\"RegionNum\":0,\"RegionCategory\":null,\"ArticlePicture\":[],\"TitleCN\":null,\"AbstractTextCN\":null,\"PMCID\":null,\"EPubDate\":\"\",\"PubModel\":\"\",\"JCR\":\"\",\"JCRName\":\"\",\"Score\":null,\"Total\":0}","platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"1993 IEEE Annual Northeast Bioengineering Conference","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1109/NEBC.1993.404433","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"","JCRName":"","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

摘要

本文讨论了心肌和骨骼肌收缩时间的比较研究。6只正常犬背阔肌(LDM)收缩次数通过LDM力和缩短测量得到。LDM采用5脉冲变频脉冲序列(VFT)和6脉冲恒频脉冲序列(CFT)进行刺激。在6次脉冲CFT刺激下,新鲜肌LDM至峰值缩短时间和总收缩次数分别为292.5 /spl plusmn/ 27.9和456.0 /spl plusmn/ 18.8。在5次脉冲VFT刺激下,LDM至峰值缩短时间和总收缩时间分别为242.5 /spl plusmn/ 17.6和395.5 /spl plusmn/ 8.7。因此,在正常骨骼肌(即,慢速I型纤维和快速II型纤维)中,收缩时间可能超过左心室机电收缩时间(心率从60到120次/分钟420到294毫秒)。这种延长的LDM收缩可能阻碍左心室舒张充盈。变频刺激可减少LDM收缩次数,从而可能防止这种充盈损伤
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
Comparison of cardiac and skeletal muscle contraction times: relevance to cardiomyoplasty
A study comparing the timing of myocardial and skeletal muscle contraction is discussed. In 6 normal dogs latissimus dorsi muscle (LDM) contraction times were derived from LDM force and shortening measurements. The LDM was stimulated with a 5 pulse variable frequency pulse train (VFT) and a 6 pulse constant frequency pulse train (CFT). With 6 pulse CFT stimulation, the LDM time to peak shortening and total contraction times were 292.5 /spl plusmn/ 27.9 and 456.0 /spl plusmn/ 18.8 in the fresh muscle. With 5 pulse VFT stimulation, the LDM time to peak shortening and total contraction times were 242.5 /spl plusmn/ 17.6 and 395.5 /spl plusmn/ 8.7. Thus, in normal skeletal muscle (i.e., both slow type I fibers and fast type II fibers) contraction times may exceed left ventricular electromechanical contraction times (420 to 294 ms for heart rates from 60 to 120 beats/minute). This prolonged LDM contraction may impede diastolic filling of the left ventricle. Variable frequency stimulation decreases LDM contraction times and thus might prevent this filling impairment.<>
求助全文
通过发布文献求助,成功后即可免费获取论文全文。 去求助
来源期刊
自引率
0.00%
发文量
0
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:604180095
Book学术官方微信