思想征服的剖析与代价:论二战以来学术的持续窒息

A. Maharatna
{"title":"思想征服的剖析与代价:论二战以来学术的持续窒息","authors":"A. Maharatna","doi":"10.2139/ssrn.3726465","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"The object of the monograph is two-fold: a) to discern directions of ideational changes and policy evolution pertaining to notions, functions, and financing of ‘higher education’ (HE) through a critical evaluation of reports/reviews/books/recommendations of a series of landmark committees/commissions/panels/ideologues especially in UK and USA since WWII; b) to assess the corresponding effects of these ideational (and policy) changes (or conquest) on academic standard/quality as well as overall societal contributions of HE. It is shown that a stark neoliberal policy regime has been established across world both via new theoretical (and ideational) constructs/formulations (mainly) by mainstream (neoclassical) economics profession with an active benefaction of the Bretton Woods institutions and other multilateral agencies. But these pro-market ideas/ideology and reforms in the sphere of HE/university (including privatization) are found to have set off – not surprisingly at all – fairly robust temporal (and global) trends of falling academic standard, rigors, and intellectual contributions/capabilities along with rapid growth of HE both as an industry and prospective propellent of foreign trade and profit. The monograph concludes that it is high time that the global leaders rethink about the future of HE as an academe.","PeriodicalId":253619,"journal":{"name":"History of Economics eJournal","volume":"3 1","pages":"0"},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"2020-11-07","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":"{\"title\":\"The Anatomy and Price of an Ideational Conquest: On Steady Stifling of Academe Since the World War II\",\"authors\":\"A. Maharatna\",\"doi\":\"10.2139/ssrn.3726465\",\"DOIUrl\":null,\"url\":null,\"abstract\":\"The object of the monograph is two-fold: a) to discern directions of ideational changes and policy evolution pertaining to notions, functions, and financing of ‘higher education’ (HE) through a critical evaluation of reports/reviews/books/recommendations of a series of landmark committees/commissions/panels/ideologues especially in UK and USA since WWII; b) to assess the corresponding effects of these ideational (and policy) changes (or conquest) on academic standard/quality as well as overall societal contributions of HE. It is shown that a stark neoliberal policy regime has been established across world both via new theoretical (and ideational) constructs/formulations (mainly) by mainstream (neoclassical) economics profession with an active benefaction of the Bretton Woods institutions and other multilateral agencies. But these pro-market ideas/ideology and reforms in the sphere of HE/university (including privatization) are found to have set off – not surprisingly at all – fairly robust temporal (and global) trends of falling academic standard, rigors, and intellectual contributions/capabilities along with rapid growth of HE both as an industry and prospective propellent of foreign trade and profit. The monograph concludes that it is high time that the global leaders rethink about the future of HE as an academe.\",\"PeriodicalId\":253619,\"journal\":{\"name\":\"History of Economics eJournal\",\"volume\":\"3 1\",\"pages\":\"0\"},\"PeriodicalIF\":0.0000,\"publicationDate\":\"2020-11-07\",\"publicationTypes\":\"Journal Article\",\"fieldsOfStudy\":null,\"isOpenAccess\":false,\"openAccessPdf\":\"\",\"citationCount\":\"0\",\"resultStr\":null,\"platform\":\"Semanticscholar\",\"paperid\":null,\"PeriodicalName\":\"History of Economics eJournal\",\"FirstCategoryId\":\"1085\",\"ListUrlMain\":\"https://doi.org/10.2139/ssrn.3726465\",\"RegionNum\":0,\"RegionCategory\":null,\"ArticlePicture\":[],\"TitleCN\":null,\"AbstractTextCN\":null,\"PMCID\":null,\"EPubDate\":\"\",\"PubModel\":\"\",\"JCR\":\"\",\"JCRName\":\"\",\"Score\":null,\"Total\":0}","platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"History of Economics eJournal","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.2139/ssrn.3726465","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"","JCRName":"","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

摘要

本专著的目的是双重的:a)通过对一系列具有里程碑意义的委员会/委员会/小组/理论家的报告/评论/书籍/建议的批判性评估,特别是在二战以来的英国和美国,来辨别与“高等教育”(HE)的概念、功能和融资有关的观念变化和政策演变的方向;b)评估这些观念(和政策)变化(或征服)对高等教育的学术水平/质量以及整体社会贡献的相应影响。研究表明,在布雷顿森林机构和其他多边机构的积极帮助下,主流(新古典)经济学专业(主要)通过新的理论(和观念)构建/表述,在全球范围内建立了一个鲜明的新自由主义政策制度。但是,这些在高等教育/大学领域的亲市场思想/意识形态和改革(包括私有化)被发现引发了——一点也不奇怪——相当强劲的时间(和全球)趋势,即学术水平、严谨性和智力贡献/能力下降,同时高等教育作为一个产业和潜在的对外贸易和利润的推动力迅速增长。该专著的结论是,现在是全球领导人重新思考高等教育作为一个学术界的未来的时候了。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
The Anatomy and Price of an Ideational Conquest: On Steady Stifling of Academe Since the World War II
The object of the monograph is two-fold: a) to discern directions of ideational changes and policy evolution pertaining to notions, functions, and financing of ‘higher education’ (HE) through a critical evaluation of reports/reviews/books/recommendations of a series of landmark committees/commissions/panels/ideologues especially in UK and USA since WWII; b) to assess the corresponding effects of these ideational (and policy) changes (or conquest) on academic standard/quality as well as overall societal contributions of HE. It is shown that a stark neoliberal policy regime has been established across world both via new theoretical (and ideational) constructs/formulations (mainly) by mainstream (neoclassical) economics profession with an active benefaction of the Bretton Woods institutions and other multilateral agencies. But these pro-market ideas/ideology and reforms in the sphere of HE/university (including privatization) are found to have set off – not surprisingly at all – fairly robust temporal (and global) trends of falling academic standard, rigors, and intellectual contributions/capabilities along with rapid growth of HE both as an industry and prospective propellent of foreign trade and profit. The monograph concludes that it is high time that the global leaders rethink about the future of HE as an academe.
求助全文
通过发布文献求助,成功后即可免费获取论文全文。 去求助
来源期刊
自引率
0.00%
发文量
0
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:604180095
Book学术官方微信