免疫疗法和靶向疗法治疗转移性恶性黑色素瘤的疗效评价

Z. Kalkan
{"title":"免疫疗法和靶向疗法治疗转移性恶性黑色素瘤的疗效评价","authors":"Z. Kalkan","doi":"10.14744/ejmi.2022.79013","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"Objectives: The prognosis of metastatic malignant melanoma is poor. In this study, we aim to evaluate the response rates, PFS and OS times obtained with Nivolumab, Ipilimumab and Dabrafenib plus Trametinib in the treatment of advanced malignant melanoma, as well as the side effect profiles of these three agents. Methods: This study included 58 patients diagnosed with advanced malignant melanoma who received Nivolumab, Ipilimumab or Dabrafenib plus Trametinib therapy between January 2010 - March 2021 and had follow-up at our clin-ic. Response rates, survival times and side effects associated with each of the three treatment arms were evaluated. Nivolumab, Ipilimumab and Dabrafenib plus Trametinib were compared with regard to effectiveness and tolerability. Results: The Nivolumab, Ipilimumab and Dabrafenib plus Trametinib treatment arms, included 34 (58.6%), 13 (22.4%) and 11 (19%) patients, respectively. The comparison of Nivolumab, Ipilimumab and Dabrafenib plus Trametinib yielded, respectively; ORR (53%, 38.5%, 72.8%), mPFS (7 months, 3 months, 9 months) (p=0.57), mOS (12 months, 16 months, 15 months) (p=0.85). Conclusion: In this study that we conducted with real life data, we confirmed that Nivolumab, Ipilimumab and Dabrafenib plus Trametinib have different effectiveness adn manageable side effect profiles in the treatment of advanced malignant melanoma. Abstract","PeriodicalId":310818,"journal":{"name":"Eurasian Journal of Medical Investigation","volume":"1 1","pages":"0"},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"1900-01-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":"{\"title\":\"Evaluation of Immunotherapy and Targeted Therapies in the Treatment of Metastatic Malignant Melanoma\",\"authors\":\"Z. Kalkan\",\"doi\":\"10.14744/ejmi.2022.79013\",\"DOIUrl\":null,\"url\":null,\"abstract\":\"Objectives: The prognosis of metastatic malignant melanoma is poor. In this study, we aim to evaluate the response rates, PFS and OS times obtained with Nivolumab, Ipilimumab and Dabrafenib plus Trametinib in the treatment of advanced malignant melanoma, as well as the side effect profiles of these three agents. Methods: This study included 58 patients diagnosed with advanced malignant melanoma who received Nivolumab, Ipilimumab or Dabrafenib plus Trametinib therapy between January 2010 - March 2021 and had follow-up at our clin-ic. Response rates, survival times and side effects associated with each of the three treatment arms were evaluated. Nivolumab, Ipilimumab and Dabrafenib plus Trametinib were compared with regard to effectiveness and tolerability. Results: The Nivolumab, Ipilimumab and Dabrafenib plus Trametinib treatment arms, included 34 (58.6%), 13 (22.4%) and 11 (19%) patients, respectively. The comparison of Nivolumab, Ipilimumab and Dabrafenib plus Trametinib yielded, respectively; ORR (53%, 38.5%, 72.8%), mPFS (7 months, 3 months, 9 months) (p=0.57), mOS (12 months, 16 months, 15 months) (p=0.85). Conclusion: In this study that we conducted with real life data, we confirmed that Nivolumab, Ipilimumab and Dabrafenib plus Trametinib have different effectiveness adn manageable side effect profiles in the treatment of advanced malignant melanoma. Abstract\",\"PeriodicalId\":310818,\"journal\":{\"name\":\"Eurasian Journal of Medical Investigation\",\"volume\":\"1 1\",\"pages\":\"0\"},\"PeriodicalIF\":0.0000,\"publicationDate\":\"1900-01-01\",\"publicationTypes\":\"Journal Article\",\"fieldsOfStudy\":null,\"isOpenAccess\":false,\"openAccessPdf\":\"\",\"citationCount\":\"0\",\"resultStr\":null,\"platform\":\"Semanticscholar\",\"paperid\":null,\"PeriodicalName\":\"Eurasian Journal of Medical Investigation\",\"FirstCategoryId\":\"1085\",\"ListUrlMain\":\"https://doi.org/10.14744/ejmi.2022.79013\",\"RegionNum\":0,\"RegionCategory\":null,\"ArticlePicture\":[],\"TitleCN\":null,\"AbstractTextCN\":null,\"PMCID\":null,\"EPubDate\":\"\",\"PubModel\":\"\",\"JCR\":\"\",\"JCRName\":\"\",\"Score\":null,\"Total\":0}","platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Eurasian Journal of Medical Investigation","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.14744/ejmi.2022.79013","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"","JCRName":"","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

摘要

目的:转移性恶性黑色素瘤预后较差。在本研究中,我们旨在评估Nivolumab、Ipilimumab和Dabrafenib + Trametinib治疗晚期恶性黑色素瘤的反应率、PFS和OS时间,以及这三种药物的副作用特征。方法:本研究纳入了58例晚期恶性黑色素瘤患者,这些患者在2010年1月至2021年3月期间接受了Nivolumab、Ipilimumab或Dabrafenib + Trametinib治疗,并在我们的诊所进行了随访。评估三个治疗组的反应率、生存时间和副作用。比较了尼武单抗、伊匹单抗和达拉法尼加曲美替尼的有效性和耐受性。结果:Nivolumab、Ipilimumab和Dabrafenib + Trametinib治疗组分别包括34例(58.6%)、13例(22.4%)和11例(19%)患者。Nivolumab、Ipilimumab和Dabrafenib + Trametinib的比较分别获得;ORR (53%, 38.5%, 72.8%), mPFS(7个月,3个月,9个月)(p=0.57), mOS(12个月,16个月,15个月)(p=0.85)。结论:在这项使用真实数据进行的研究中,我们证实了Nivolumab、Ipilimumab和Dabrafenib + Trametinib在治疗晚期恶性黑色素瘤方面具有不同的有效性和可控的副作用。摘要
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
Evaluation of Immunotherapy and Targeted Therapies in the Treatment of Metastatic Malignant Melanoma
Objectives: The prognosis of metastatic malignant melanoma is poor. In this study, we aim to evaluate the response rates, PFS and OS times obtained with Nivolumab, Ipilimumab and Dabrafenib plus Trametinib in the treatment of advanced malignant melanoma, as well as the side effect profiles of these three agents. Methods: This study included 58 patients diagnosed with advanced malignant melanoma who received Nivolumab, Ipilimumab or Dabrafenib plus Trametinib therapy between January 2010 - March 2021 and had follow-up at our clin-ic. Response rates, survival times and side effects associated with each of the three treatment arms were evaluated. Nivolumab, Ipilimumab and Dabrafenib plus Trametinib were compared with regard to effectiveness and tolerability. Results: The Nivolumab, Ipilimumab and Dabrafenib plus Trametinib treatment arms, included 34 (58.6%), 13 (22.4%) and 11 (19%) patients, respectively. The comparison of Nivolumab, Ipilimumab and Dabrafenib plus Trametinib yielded, respectively; ORR (53%, 38.5%, 72.8%), mPFS (7 months, 3 months, 9 months) (p=0.57), mOS (12 months, 16 months, 15 months) (p=0.85). Conclusion: In this study that we conducted with real life data, we confirmed that Nivolumab, Ipilimumab and Dabrafenib plus Trametinib have different effectiveness adn manageable side effect profiles in the treatment of advanced malignant melanoma. Abstract
求助全文
通过发布文献求助,成功后即可免费获取论文全文。 去求助
来源期刊
自引率
0.00%
发文量
0
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术官方微信