PECULIARITIES OF DOMESTIC AND FOREIGN EXPERIENCE IN SOLVING THE PROBLEM OF ARCHITECTURAL MONUMENTS THAT ARE IN THE «RUIN» STAGE

In this article, an attempt is made to consider architectural and architectural-spatial objects that are in a state of ruin as elements of resettlement, which should be offered new principles of ordering the past through the modern future. Examples of foreign approaches to this problem are given and the existing methodology of domestic experience is considered. As a result, to justify the attempt and present the objects not as given buildings, but as elements of the systemic interaction of nature - "ruin" - a settlement system. The object of the ruin must exist as a necessary element of the spatial development of settlement systems of different levels. The article shows the dubiousness of some methods, which predict the completion of restoration processes, and not the provision of new vital functions, which are directly related to the landscape and recreational environment and the development of an important industry for the country - tourism. The approach when the process when the process of reconstruction, conservation, etc. involves providing it with a specific function in the future, which does not yet exist, especially one similar to the past purpose, is questionable. In the opinion of the authors, the use of a monofunction - an onal function in the future, and not a system element of resettlement - is questionable. Therefore, the question "it is impossible to restore can't be destroyed" remains open.