阿拉伯语水平测试:分析与评价研究

{"title":"阿拉伯语水平测试:分析与评价研究","authors":"","doi":"10.51405/17.2.8","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"The need for a standardized Arabic proficiency language test for speakers of other\nlanguages and/or even native speakers of Arabic still poses a challenge for specialists in\nArabic applied linguistics and teachers of Arabic to speakers of other languages alike.\nDespite many attempts to produce such a standardized test over the past decades, yet\nthey fall short of being satisfactory to be accepted as international tests like other\ninternational recognized and widely implemented language proficiency tests due to their\nmany short comings. This study is twofold: first, it is an attempt to shed light on some of\nthe Arabic language proficiency tests produced and implemented thus far such as the test produced by the American Association of Teachers of Arabic (AATA), the test produced by the Center for Applied Linguistics (CAL) and the test, with limited implementation,produced by the Arabic Linguistics Institute at King Saud University (ALI). The studypresents a thorough analysis pertaining to content and theoretical framework in light of standards for language proficiency tests. Second, the paper presents an empirical study on the results of 70 students from three language levels in the department of Language and Culture who were studying Arabic as a second Language and sat for the ALI test when experimenting on it. The variables examined were the number of languages they speak, the number of years they spent learning Arabic before joining the program and the level they were placed in according to the department own language test. The goalwas to see the impact of these variables on the four language skills; writing, reading, listening and speaking and whether their results in the proficiency test matches their placement by the department in the different language levels. Statistical results and discussions are based on SSPS. The study concludes with some pedagogical implications and recommendations.\nKeywords: Proficiency, Test, Standards, Standardized tests, Arabic for speakers of other\nlanguages.","PeriodicalId":264644,"journal":{"name":"Journal of the Faculties of Arts","volume":"67 1","pages":"0"},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"2020-10-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":"{\"title\":\"Arabic Proficiency Test: An Analytical and Evaluation Study\",\"authors\":\"\",\"doi\":\"10.51405/17.2.8\",\"DOIUrl\":null,\"url\":null,\"abstract\":\"The need for a standardized Arabic proficiency language test for speakers of other\\nlanguages and/or even native speakers of Arabic still poses a challenge for specialists in\\nArabic applied linguistics and teachers of Arabic to speakers of other languages alike.\\nDespite many attempts to produce such a standardized test over the past decades, yet\\nthey fall short of being satisfactory to be accepted as international tests like other\\ninternational recognized and widely implemented language proficiency tests due to their\\nmany short comings. This study is twofold: first, it is an attempt to shed light on some of\\nthe Arabic language proficiency tests produced and implemented thus far such as the test produced by the American Association of Teachers of Arabic (AATA), the test produced by the Center for Applied Linguistics (CAL) and the test, with limited implementation,produced by the Arabic Linguistics Institute at King Saud University (ALI). The studypresents a thorough analysis pertaining to content and theoretical framework in light of standards for language proficiency tests. Second, the paper presents an empirical study on the results of 70 students from three language levels in the department of Language and Culture who were studying Arabic as a second Language and sat for the ALI test when experimenting on it. The variables examined were the number of languages they speak, the number of years they spent learning Arabic before joining the program and the level they were placed in according to the department own language test. The goalwas to see the impact of these variables on the four language skills; writing, reading, listening and speaking and whether their results in the proficiency test matches their placement by the department in the different language levels. Statistical results and discussions are based on SSPS. The study concludes with some pedagogical implications and recommendations.\\nKeywords: Proficiency, Test, Standards, Standardized tests, Arabic for speakers of other\\nlanguages.\",\"PeriodicalId\":264644,\"journal\":{\"name\":\"Journal of the Faculties of Arts\",\"volume\":\"67 1\",\"pages\":\"0\"},\"PeriodicalIF\":0.0000,\"publicationDate\":\"2020-10-01\",\"publicationTypes\":\"Journal Article\",\"fieldsOfStudy\":null,\"isOpenAccess\":false,\"openAccessPdf\":\"\",\"citationCount\":\"0\",\"resultStr\":null,\"platform\":\"Semanticscholar\",\"paperid\":null,\"PeriodicalName\":\"Journal of the Faculties of Arts\",\"FirstCategoryId\":\"1085\",\"ListUrlMain\":\"https://doi.org/10.51405/17.2.8\",\"RegionNum\":0,\"RegionCategory\":null,\"ArticlePicture\":[],\"TitleCN\":null,\"AbstractTextCN\":null,\"PMCID\":null,\"EPubDate\":\"\",\"PubModel\":\"\",\"JCR\":\"\",\"JCRName\":\"\",\"Score\":null,\"Total\":0}","platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Journal of the Faculties of Arts","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.51405/17.2.8","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"","JCRName":"","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

摘要

对说其他语言的人和/或甚至以阿拉伯语为母语的人进行标准化的阿拉伯语熟练程度考试的需要,仍然对阿拉伯语应用语言学专家和向说其他语言的人教授阿拉伯语的教师构成挑战。尽管在过去的几十年里,人们曾多次尝试制作这样一个标准化的测试,但由于它们的许多缺点,它们不能像其他国际公认和广泛实施的语言能力测试那样被接受为国际测试。本研究具有双重意义:首先,它试图阐明迄今为止制作和实施的一些阿拉伯语能力测试,如由美国阿拉伯语教师协会(AATA)制作的测试,由应用语言学中心(CAL)制作的测试,以及由沙特国王大学阿拉伯语言学研究所(ALI)制作的测试,但实施有限。该研究提出了一个全面的分析有关的内容和理论框架在标准的语言能力测试的光。其次,本文对70名以阿拉伯语为第二语言的语言与文化系三个语言水平的学生进行了实证研究,并在实验时参加了ALI测试。调查的变量包括他们会说的语言的数量,他们在加入该项目之前学习阿拉伯语的年数,以及他们根据系里自己的语言测试所处的水平。目的是观察这些变量对四种语言技能的影响;写作、阅读、听力和口语,以及他们在能力测试中的成绩是否与该系在不同语言水平上的安排相符。统计结果和讨论是基于ssp的。研究最后提出了一些教学启示和建议。关键词:熟练程度,测试,标准,标准化测试,其他语言的阿拉伯语。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
Arabic Proficiency Test: An Analytical and Evaluation Study
The need for a standardized Arabic proficiency language test for speakers of other languages and/or even native speakers of Arabic still poses a challenge for specialists in Arabic applied linguistics and teachers of Arabic to speakers of other languages alike. Despite many attempts to produce such a standardized test over the past decades, yet they fall short of being satisfactory to be accepted as international tests like other international recognized and widely implemented language proficiency tests due to their many short comings. This study is twofold: first, it is an attempt to shed light on some of the Arabic language proficiency tests produced and implemented thus far such as the test produced by the American Association of Teachers of Arabic (AATA), the test produced by the Center for Applied Linguistics (CAL) and the test, with limited implementation,produced by the Arabic Linguistics Institute at King Saud University (ALI). The studypresents a thorough analysis pertaining to content and theoretical framework in light of standards for language proficiency tests. Second, the paper presents an empirical study on the results of 70 students from three language levels in the department of Language and Culture who were studying Arabic as a second Language and sat for the ALI test when experimenting on it. The variables examined were the number of languages they speak, the number of years they spent learning Arabic before joining the program and the level they were placed in according to the department own language test. The goalwas to see the impact of these variables on the four language skills; writing, reading, listening and speaking and whether their results in the proficiency test matches their placement by the department in the different language levels. Statistical results and discussions are based on SSPS. The study concludes with some pedagogical implications and recommendations. Keywords: Proficiency, Test, Standards, Standardized tests, Arabic for speakers of other languages.
求助全文
通过发布文献求助,成功后即可免费获取论文全文。 去求助
来源期刊
自引率
0.00%
发文量
0
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术官方微信