SOME ISSUES OF REFUSAL OR TERMINATION OF THE CASE IN CONNECTION WITH RECONCILIATION AND ACTUAL REPENTANCE FOR WHAT THEY DID

This article examines the procedural problems associated with reconciliation and the release of persons from responsibility in connection with actual repentance for their actions, as well as the refusal or termination of proceedings in a case that is its procedural order, and aspects of the legal regulation of these issues. The article analyzes, from the point of view of legislation and practice, the material and procedural bases of exemption from this responsibility provided for by criminal and criminal procedural law, scientific considerations and recommendations for overcoming existing problematic and conflict situations are developed. Emphasis is also paid to problematic situations encountered in the substantive and procedural norms related to the refusal and termination of proceedings in a conciliation case, which examines the exclusion of war crimes from the list of conciliation crimes and their legal aspects. The study used such methods as analysis, synthesis, induction, deduction, and comparative legal analysis. In the course of the study, advanced foreign experience, scientific and theoretical views, and investigative and judicial practice were studied, as a result of which proposals and recommendations were developed for making appropriate amendments and additions to the Criminal Procedural Code of the Republic of Uzbekistan and other legislative and subordinate acts.