{"title":"铀","authors":"T. Greenwood, Alvin Streeter","doi":"10.4324/9780429051340-10","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"Uranium, though generall y mobile in the sexivalent state, can be relatively stabilized by precipitation as arsenate , phosphate , or vanadat e (McKelvey et al, 1 955), but these compounds commonl y prefer arid climates. In dry environments , uranyl silicates, carbonates , and sulfates form by desiccation and are fairly stable at the surface. Uranium reduction and precipitation of \"primary\" uranous silicate or uranous oxide require an external agent , most commonl y organi c material , of which coals of bituminous or lower rank are most efficient (Moore, 1954). Uranium is extracted from seawater most commonl y as a substitution for calcium in phosphorit e (Altschuler et al, 1958), for which some reduction mechanis m is required, and as an adsorption on carbonaceou s matter in black shales (Conant and Swanson, 1961). Uranium in both these environment s is very stable, as indicated by the uniformity in grade along outcrops throughout large areas and even regions. The uranium so fixed is removed from circulation and can reenter the mobilization cycle only by being erosivel y destroyed or fed into the anatecti c root of an orogene. Uranium migrating in continental groundwater has relatively littl e opportunity for fixation. Hven in the arid climate of the Colorado Plateau, the relatively insoluble sexivalent vanadates are never far from carbon trash concentrations , and these obviously have been oxidized from \"primary\" unoxidized pitchblende deposit s at shal low depths. Therefore, the original fixation of uranium on the Colorado Plateau was mostly through reduction by organi c matter. Reduction by iron, sulfur oxidation in limestone, and fixation by adsorption on clay are interpreted generall y to have been of minor importance in forming the presentl y known, \"conventional \" type of sandstone uranium impregnations , but they may have been more influential in other lower grade types of deposits. The exact mechanisms of reduction and fixation by organi c matter have been extensively investigated (Moore, 1954; Breger and Deul, 1956; Schmidt-Collerus , 1969), but still are not well understood. Gruner (1956) exerted maximum influence on the shift of interpretation toward laterogenesi of shallow uranium with his paper on the multiple migration-accretio n mechanism, based on the precipitation of pitchblende in the laboratory with HTS and organi c matter at surface temperatures . Since then, many have visualized unoxidized uranium concentrations in sandstone as being in slow but constant migration downdip, by means of constantl y repeated oxidation and reduction, in favorabl e aquifers and near the top of the saturated zone. The source of H2S was a problem for a while. Jensen (1958) and others have emphasized the role of anaerobi c bacteri a in reducing supergen e sulfate to H2S, the reoxidation of which is believed to reduce the uranium. Schmidt-Collerus (1969) failed to find anaerobi c bacteri a in any of the uranium deposit s he investigated; he believes that reduction by organi c complexing of still uncertai n character is more probabl y responsible for uranium fixation. This alternative is supported by the uranium impregnations in Westwater sandstone in the Grants district. The Westwater lacks abundant carbon trash and pyrite, but does","PeriodicalId":380927,"journal":{"name":"Natural Resources in U.S.-Canadian Relations","volume":"163 1","pages":"0"},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"2019-03-13","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":"{\"title\":\"Uranium\",\"authors\":\"T. Greenwood, Alvin Streeter\",\"doi\":\"10.4324/9780429051340-10\",\"DOIUrl\":null,\"url\":null,\"abstract\":\"Uranium, though generall y mobile in the sexivalent state, can be relatively stabilized by precipitation as arsenate , phosphate , or vanadat e (McKelvey et al, 1 955), but these compounds commonl y prefer arid climates. In dry environments , uranyl silicates, carbonates , and sulfates form by desiccation and are fairly stable at the surface. Uranium reduction and precipitation of \\\"primary\\\" uranous silicate or uranous oxide require an external agent , most commonl y organi c material , of which coals of bituminous or lower rank are most efficient (Moore, 1954). Uranium is extracted from seawater most commonl y as a substitution for calcium in phosphorit e (Altschuler et al, 1958), for which some reduction mechanis m is required, and as an adsorption on carbonaceou s matter in black shales (Conant and Swanson, 1961). Uranium in both these environment s is very stable, as indicated by the uniformity in grade along outcrops throughout large areas and even regions. The uranium so fixed is removed from circulation and can reenter the mobilization cycle only by being erosivel y destroyed or fed into the anatecti c root of an orogene. Uranium migrating in continental groundwater has relatively littl e opportunity for fixation. Hven in the arid climate of the Colorado Plateau, the relatively insoluble sexivalent vanadates are never far from carbon trash concentrations , and these obviously have been oxidized from \\\"primary\\\" unoxidized pitchblende deposit s at shal low depths. Therefore, the original fixation of uranium on the Colorado Plateau was mostly through reduction by organi c matter. Reduction by iron, sulfur oxidation in limestone, and fixation by adsorption on clay are interpreted generall y to have been of minor importance in forming the presentl y known, \\\"conventional \\\" type of sandstone uranium impregnations , but they may have been more influential in other lower grade types of deposits. The exact mechanisms of reduction and fixation by organi c matter have been extensively investigated (Moore, 1954; Breger and Deul, 1956; Schmidt-Collerus , 1969), but still are not well understood. Gruner (1956) exerted maximum influence on the shift of interpretation toward laterogenesi of shallow uranium with his paper on the multiple migration-accretio n mechanism, based on the precipitation of pitchblende in the laboratory with HTS and organi c matter at surface temperatures . Since then, many have visualized unoxidized uranium concentrations in sandstone as being in slow but constant migration downdip, by means of constantl y repeated oxidation and reduction, in favorabl e aquifers and near the top of the saturated zone. The source of H2S was a problem for a while. Jensen (1958) and others have emphasized the role of anaerobi c bacteri a in reducing supergen e sulfate to H2S, the reoxidation of which is believed to reduce the uranium. Schmidt-Collerus (1969) failed to find anaerobi c bacteri a in any of the uranium deposit s he investigated; he believes that reduction by organi c complexing of still uncertai n character is more probabl y responsible for uranium fixation. This alternative is supported by the uranium impregnations in Westwater sandstone in the Grants district. The Westwater lacks abundant carbon trash and pyrite, but does\",\"PeriodicalId\":380927,\"journal\":{\"name\":\"Natural Resources in U.S.-Canadian Relations\",\"volume\":\"163 1\",\"pages\":\"0\"},\"PeriodicalIF\":0.0000,\"publicationDate\":\"2019-03-13\",\"publicationTypes\":\"Journal Article\",\"fieldsOfStudy\":null,\"isOpenAccess\":false,\"openAccessPdf\":\"\",\"citationCount\":\"0\",\"resultStr\":null,\"platform\":\"Semanticscholar\",\"paperid\":null,\"PeriodicalName\":\"Natural Resources in U.S.-Canadian Relations\",\"FirstCategoryId\":\"1085\",\"ListUrlMain\":\"https://doi.org/10.4324/9780429051340-10\",\"RegionNum\":0,\"RegionCategory\":null,\"ArticlePicture\":[],\"TitleCN\":null,\"AbstractTextCN\":null,\"PMCID\":null,\"EPubDate\":\"\",\"PubModel\":\"\",\"JCR\":\"\",\"JCRName\":\"\",\"Score\":null,\"Total\":0}","platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Natural Resources in U.S.-Canadian Relations","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.4324/9780429051340-10","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"","JCRName":"","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0
摘要
铀虽然在六价状态下通常是可移动的,但可以通过沉淀以砷酸盐、磷酸盐或钒的形式相对稳定(McKelvey等人,1955年),但这些化合物通常更喜欢干旱气候。在干燥的环境中,铀酰硅酸盐、碳酸盐和硫酸盐通过干燥形成,在表面相当稳定。铀的还原和“原生”硅酸铀或氧化铀的沉淀需要外部助剂,最常见的是有机物质,其中烟煤或更低等级的煤最有效(Moore, 1954)。从海水中提取铀,最常见的是作为磷中的钙的替代品(Altschuler等人,1958),因为磷需要某种还原机制,以及作为黑色页岩中碳质物质的吸附物(Conant和Swanson, 1961)。这两种环境中的铀都是非常稳定的,这可以从沿露头的品位均匀性看出来。如此固定的铀被从循环中移除,只有被侵蚀破坏或被送入造山带的排泄根,才能重新进入动员循环。在陆相地下水中迁移的铀相对来说很少有固定的机会。即使在科罗拉多高原的干旱气候中,相对不溶的六价钒酸盐也从未远离碳垃圾浓度,它们显然是由浅层低深度的“原生”未氧化沥青铀矿床氧化而来的。因此,科罗拉多高原上铀的原始固定主要是通过有机物的还原。铁的还原作用、石灰石中的硫氧化作用和粘土的吸附固定作用一般被解释为对形成目前已知的“常规”类型砂岩铀浸渍作用不大,但它们在其他低品位类型的矿床中可能影响更大。有机物还原和固定的确切机制已被广泛研究(Moore, 1954;Breger and Deul, 1956;Schmidt-Collerus, 1969),但仍然没有得到很好的理解。Gruner(1956)对浅层铀解释向后期成因的转变影响最大,他的论文基于高温超导和地表温度下有机物在实验室中沉淀沥青铀矿的多重迁移-吸积机制。从那时起,许多人认为砂岩中未氧化的铀浓度通过不断重复的氧化和还原,在有利的含水层和靠近饱和带顶部的地方,处于缓慢但持续的向下倾斜迁移状态。硫化氢的来源一度是个问题。Jensen(1958)等人强调厌氧细菌a在将硫酸氢还原为H2S中的作用,H2S的再氧化被认为可以还原铀。Schmidt-Collerus(1969)没有在他所调查的铀矿床中发现厌氧菌a;他认为,性质尚不确定的有机络合的还原更有可能是铀固定的原因。这一选择得到了格兰特地区西水砂岩中铀浸渍的支持。西水缺乏丰富的碳垃圾和黄铁矿,但确实如此
Uranium, though generall y mobile in the sexivalent state, can be relatively stabilized by precipitation as arsenate , phosphate , or vanadat e (McKelvey et al, 1 955), but these compounds commonl y prefer arid climates. In dry environments , uranyl silicates, carbonates , and sulfates form by desiccation and are fairly stable at the surface. Uranium reduction and precipitation of "primary" uranous silicate or uranous oxide require an external agent , most commonl y organi c material , of which coals of bituminous or lower rank are most efficient (Moore, 1954). Uranium is extracted from seawater most commonl y as a substitution for calcium in phosphorit e (Altschuler et al, 1958), for which some reduction mechanis m is required, and as an adsorption on carbonaceou s matter in black shales (Conant and Swanson, 1961). Uranium in both these environment s is very stable, as indicated by the uniformity in grade along outcrops throughout large areas and even regions. The uranium so fixed is removed from circulation and can reenter the mobilization cycle only by being erosivel y destroyed or fed into the anatecti c root of an orogene. Uranium migrating in continental groundwater has relatively littl e opportunity for fixation. Hven in the arid climate of the Colorado Plateau, the relatively insoluble sexivalent vanadates are never far from carbon trash concentrations , and these obviously have been oxidized from "primary" unoxidized pitchblende deposit s at shal low depths. Therefore, the original fixation of uranium on the Colorado Plateau was mostly through reduction by organi c matter. Reduction by iron, sulfur oxidation in limestone, and fixation by adsorption on clay are interpreted generall y to have been of minor importance in forming the presentl y known, "conventional " type of sandstone uranium impregnations , but they may have been more influential in other lower grade types of deposits. The exact mechanisms of reduction and fixation by organi c matter have been extensively investigated (Moore, 1954; Breger and Deul, 1956; Schmidt-Collerus , 1969), but still are not well understood. Gruner (1956) exerted maximum influence on the shift of interpretation toward laterogenesi of shallow uranium with his paper on the multiple migration-accretio n mechanism, based on the precipitation of pitchblende in the laboratory with HTS and organi c matter at surface temperatures . Since then, many have visualized unoxidized uranium concentrations in sandstone as being in slow but constant migration downdip, by means of constantl y repeated oxidation and reduction, in favorabl e aquifers and near the top of the saturated zone. The source of H2S was a problem for a while. Jensen (1958) and others have emphasized the role of anaerobi c bacteri a in reducing supergen e sulfate to H2S, the reoxidation of which is believed to reduce the uranium. Schmidt-Collerus (1969) failed to find anaerobi c bacteri a in any of the uranium deposit s he investigated; he believes that reduction by organi c complexing of still uncertai n character is more probabl y responsible for uranium fixation. This alternative is supported by the uranium impregnations in Westwater sandstone in the Grants district. The Westwater lacks abundant carbon trash and pyrite, but does