{"title":"D类医院重复使用透析器对常规血液透析患者充分性的影响及其与成本效益的关系","authors":"Rulita Ayu Kusuma Ningtiyas","doi":"10.22146/ahj.v3i2.66612","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"Background: Hemodialysis (HD) is one of the high cost service unit in the hospital which it implemented the cost effciency policy by the application of reuse dialyzer. According to claim recieved from Jaminan Kesehatan Nasional (JKN) system, the HD procedure for type D hospitals received the smallest claim payment if it compared to type A, B and C hospitals. This policy will be measured its effect on the effectiveness in the form of Ureum Reduction Ratio (URR) and Kt/V values and it associated with cost efficiency in type D hospital settings. Objectives The aims of this study were to 1.) Measure the corellation between the policy of using reuse dialyzer and the HD adequacy value and 2.) Evaluate the cost efficiency policy implemented by type D hospital HD unit in the form of using reuse dialyzer. Methods: This study was conducted with a cross-sectional design study from URR and Kt/V data on routine HD patients at 4 of type D hospital in Yogyakarta and Cantral Java in period Januari-March 2021. HD adequacy values were compared between the groups using the new and reuse dialyser. Cost efficiency was calculated based on the cost difference between cost of the HD procedure using a reuse dialyser and the projected cost if it is carried out with a single-use dialyzer.Result and Discussion: HD adequacy data were obtained from 112 subjects consisting of 22 with a new dialyzer, 32 with a reused (R) dialyzer first and R2, 27 with R3-R4 and 31 with R5-R7.The analysis of the effect of using reuse dializer on URR and Kt/V in the group with the new and reuse dialyser was obtained p = 0,90 and 0,91. The HD adequacy value in using reuse dialyser was not significantly different from using the new dialyser. The result of the cost efficiency analysis was 20.55% with using reuse dialyzer when it is associated with a source of income for HD services in type D hospitals.Conclusion: The application of reuse dialyzer is proved that it did not affect HD adequacy achievement when it compared to the use of a new dialyzer, and saved costs on HD services in type D hospitals. Keywords: Hemodialysis, reuse dialyzer, HD adequacy, efficiency","PeriodicalId":271282,"journal":{"name":"Academic Hospital Journal","volume":"10 1","pages":"0"},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"2023-02-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":"{\"title\":\"The Impact of Reuse Dialyzer Application on Routine Hemodialysis Patients Adequacy and Its Correlation with Cost Efficiency in Type D Hospital\",\"authors\":\"Rulita Ayu Kusuma Ningtiyas\",\"doi\":\"10.22146/ahj.v3i2.66612\",\"DOIUrl\":null,\"url\":null,\"abstract\":\"Background: Hemodialysis (HD) is one of the high cost service unit in the hospital which it implemented the cost effciency policy by the application of reuse dialyzer. According to claim recieved from Jaminan Kesehatan Nasional (JKN) system, the HD procedure for type D hospitals received the smallest claim payment if it compared to type A, B and C hospitals. This policy will be measured its effect on the effectiveness in the form of Ureum Reduction Ratio (URR) and Kt/V values and it associated with cost efficiency in type D hospital settings. Objectives The aims of this study were to 1.) Measure the corellation between the policy of using reuse dialyzer and the HD adequacy value and 2.) Evaluate the cost efficiency policy implemented by type D hospital HD unit in the form of using reuse dialyzer. Methods: This study was conducted with a cross-sectional design study from URR and Kt/V data on routine HD patients at 4 of type D hospital in Yogyakarta and Cantral Java in period Januari-March 2021. HD adequacy values were compared between the groups using the new and reuse dialyser. Cost efficiency was calculated based on the cost difference between cost of the HD procedure using a reuse dialyser and the projected cost if it is carried out with a single-use dialyzer.Result and Discussion: HD adequacy data were obtained from 112 subjects consisting of 22 with a new dialyzer, 32 with a reused (R) dialyzer first and R2, 27 with R3-R4 and 31 with R5-R7.The analysis of the effect of using reuse dializer on URR and Kt/V in the group with the new and reuse dialyser was obtained p = 0,90 and 0,91. The HD adequacy value in using reuse dialyser was not significantly different from using the new dialyser. The result of the cost efficiency analysis was 20.55% with using reuse dialyzer when it is associated with a source of income for HD services in type D hospitals.Conclusion: The application of reuse dialyzer is proved that it did not affect HD adequacy achievement when it compared to the use of a new dialyzer, and saved costs on HD services in type D hospitals. Keywords: Hemodialysis, reuse dialyzer, HD adequacy, efficiency\",\"PeriodicalId\":271282,\"journal\":{\"name\":\"Academic Hospital Journal\",\"volume\":\"10 1\",\"pages\":\"0\"},\"PeriodicalIF\":0.0000,\"publicationDate\":\"2023-02-01\",\"publicationTypes\":\"Journal Article\",\"fieldsOfStudy\":null,\"isOpenAccess\":false,\"openAccessPdf\":\"\",\"citationCount\":\"0\",\"resultStr\":null,\"platform\":\"Semanticscholar\",\"paperid\":null,\"PeriodicalName\":\"Academic Hospital Journal\",\"FirstCategoryId\":\"1085\",\"ListUrlMain\":\"https://doi.org/10.22146/ahj.v3i2.66612\",\"RegionNum\":0,\"RegionCategory\":null,\"ArticlePicture\":[],\"TitleCN\":null,\"AbstractTextCN\":null,\"PMCID\":null,\"EPubDate\":\"\",\"PubModel\":\"\",\"JCR\":\"\",\"JCRName\":\"\",\"Score\":null,\"Total\":0}","platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Academic Hospital Journal","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.22146/ahj.v3i2.66612","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"","JCRName":"","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0
摘要
背景:血液透析是医院高成本服务单位之一,通过重复使用透析器实施成本效益政策。根据从Jaminan Kesehatan national (JKN)系统收到的索赔,与A、B和C类医院相比,D类医院的HD程序收到的索赔付款最少。在D类医院环境中,将以尿样减少率(URR)和Kt/V值的形式衡量该政策对有效性的影响,并将其与成本效率相关联。本研究的目的是:1。2.测量重用透析器使用策略与HD充分性值之间的相关性。评价D型医院HD单位以重复使用透析器的形式实施的成本效益政策。方法:采用横断面设计研究方法,对2021年1 - 3月在日惹和中爪哇4家D类医院的常规HD患者的URR和Kt/V数据进行研究。比较使用新透析器组和重复使用透析器组的HD充分性值。成本效率是根据使用可重复使用的透析器的HD程序成本与使用一次性透析器的预计成本之间的成本差异来计算的。结果与讨论:112例患者获得HD充分性数据,其中22例使用新透析器,32例使用重复使用(R)透析器和R2, 27例使用R3-R4, 31例使用R5-R7。分析使用新透析器组和使用重复透析器组的URR和Kt/V的影响,得到p = 0.90和0.91。重复使用透析器与使用新透析器的HD充分性值无显著差异。在D类医院中,重复使用透析器作为透析服务的收入来源,其成本效益分析结果为20.55%。结论:与使用新型透析器相比,重复使用透析器不影响血液透析充分性的实现,节省了D类医院血液透析服务的成本。关键词:血液透析,再利用透析器,HD充分性,效率
The Impact of Reuse Dialyzer Application on Routine Hemodialysis Patients Adequacy and Its Correlation with Cost Efficiency in Type D Hospital
Background: Hemodialysis (HD) is one of the high cost service unit in the hospital which it implemented the cost effciency policy by the application of reuse dialyzer. According to claim recieved from Jaminan Kesehatan Nasional (JKN) system, the HD procedure for type D hospitals received the smallest claim payment if it compared to type A, B and C hospitals. This policy will be measured its effect on the effectiveness in the form of Ureum Reduction Ratio (URR) and Kt/V values and it associated with cost efficiency in type D hospital settings. Objectives The aims of this study were to 1.) Measure the corellation between the policy of using reuse dialyzer and the HD adequacy value and 2.) Evaluate the cost efficiency policy implemented by type D hospital HD unit in the form of using reuse dialyzer. Methods: This study was conducted with a cross-sectional design study from URR and Kt/V data on routine HD patients at 4 of type D hospital in Yogyakarta and Cantral Java in period Januari-March 2021. HD adequacy values were compared between the groups using the new and reuse dialyser. Cost efficiency was calculated based on the cost difference between cost of the HD procedure using a reuse dialyser and the projected cost if it is carried out with a single-use dialyzer.Result and Discussion: HD adequacy data were obtained from 112 subjects consisting of 22 with a new dialyzer, 32 with a reused (R) dialyzer first and R2, 27 with R3-R4 and 31 with R5-R7.The analysis of the effect of using reuse dializer on URR and Kt/V in the group with the new and reuse dialyser was obtained p = 0,90 and 0,91. The HD adequacy value in using reuse dialyser was not significantly different from using the new dialyser. The result of the cost efficiency analysis was 20.55% with using reuse dialyzer when it is associated with a source of income for HD services in type D hospitals.Conclusion: The application of reuse dialyzer is proved that it did not affect HD adequacy achievement when it compared to the use of a new dialyzer, and saved costs on HD services in type D hospitals. Keywords: Hemodialysis, reuse dialyzer, HD adequacy, efficiency