{"title":"明确的意义和明确的标记","authors":"M. Sailer, Assif Am-David","doi":"10.21248/hpsg.2016.33","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"\nWe look at definite marking\nin Esperanto, Papiamentu, and Yiddish considering three semantically\ndefinite contexts: the referential use of proper names and unique\nnouns, as well as anaphoric definites. We argue for a\nthree-dimensional analysis of definiteness: an individual denotation,\nan existence presupposition, and a uniqueness conventional\nimplicature. We present an HPSG encoding of this system and model the\ncentral aspects of the definite marking systems of our three object\nlanguages.","PeriodicalId":388937,"journal":{"name":"Proceedings of the International Conference on Head-Driven Phrase Structure Grammar","volume":"46 1","pages":"0"},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"2016-12-16","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"8","resultStr":"{\"title\":\"Definite meaning and definite marking\",\"authors\":\"M. Sailer, Assif Am-David\",\"doi\":\"10.21248/hpsg.2016.33\",\"DOIUrl\":null,\"url\":null,\"abstract\":\"\\nWe look at definite marking\\nin Esperanto, Papiamentu, and Yiddish considering three semantically\\ndefinite contexts: the referential use of proper names and unique\\nnouns, as well as anaphoric definites. We argue for a\\nthree-dimensional analysis of definiteness: an individual denotation,\\nan existence presupposition, and a uniqueness conventional\\nimplicature. We present an HPSG encoding of this system and model the\\ncentral aspects of the definite marking systems of our three object\\nlanguages.\",\"PeriodicalId\":388937,\"journal\":{\"name\":\"Proceedings of the International Conference on Head-Driven Phrase Structure Grammar\",\"volume\":\"46 1\",\"pages\":\"0\"},\"PeriodicalIF\":0.0000,\"publicationDate\":\"2016-12-16\",\"publicationTypes\":\"Journal Article\",\"fieldsOfStudy\":null,\"isOpenAccess\":false,\"openAccessPdf\":\"\",\"citationCount\":\"8\",\"resultStr\":null,\"platform\":\"Semanticscholar\",\"paperid\":null,\"PeriodicalName\":\"Proceedings of the International Conference on Head-Driven Phrase Structure Grammar\",\"FirstCategoryId\":\"1085\",\"ListUrlMain\":\"https://doi.org/10.21248/hpsg.2016.33\",\"RegionNum\":0,\"RegionCategory\":null,\"ArticlePicture\":[],\"TitleCN\":null,\"AbstractTextCN\":null,\"PMCID\":null,\"EPubDate\":\"\",\"PubModel\":\"\",\"JCR\":\"\",\"JCRName\":\"\",\"Score\":null,\"Total\":0}","platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Proceedings of the International Conference on Head-Driven Phrase Structure Grammar","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.21248/hpsg.2016.33","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"","JCRName":"","Score":null,"Total":0}
We look at definite marking
in Esperanto, Papiamentu, and Yiddish considering three semantically
definite contexts: the referential use of proper names and unique
nouns, as well as anaphoric definites. We argue for a
three-dimensional analysis of definiteness: an individual denotation,
an existence presupposition, and a uniqueness conventional
implicature. We present an HPSG encoding of this system and model the
central aspects of the definite marking systems of our three object
languages.