专家小组确定可预防围产期死亡的效用:来自印度卡纳塔克邦两个地区基于审计的介入研究的结果

Harsha Kumar H N, Shantaram B. Baliga, P. Kushtagi, N. Kamath, S. Rao
{"title":"专家小组确定可预防围产期死亡的效用:来自印度卡纳塔克邦两个地区基于审计的介入研究的结果","authors":"Harsha Kumar H N, Shantaram B. Baliga, P. Kushtagi, N. Kamath, S. Rao","doi":"10.55489/njcm.140820233157","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"Background: India has child death review which misses the information from private hospitals and community. Community based perinatal death auditing is required to identify preventable perinatal deaths. The objectives are to know utility of expert panel in an audit-based approach to identify 1). preventable perinatal deaths, 2) Risk factors in cases of perinatal deaths\nMethodology: Perinatal death auditing was conducted in two districts of Karnataka state. As a part of audit system, an expert panel consisting of paediatricians and obstetricians was formed for each district. The panel met every month and received information about perinatal deaths occurring in the hospitals (government and private) apart from the community in these districts. The panel considered available information about survival chances and care provided to decide if a perinatal death was preventable, possibly preventable or not preventable.\nResults: Proportion Of identified preventable and possibly preventable perinatal deaths in Koppal District (60%, 20%) was higher than Dakshina Kannada district (34.4%, 30.2%). The proportion preventable intranatal and neonatal risks in Koppal District (79%, 66%) was higher than Dakshina Kannada District (47%, 19%).\nConclusion: Expert panel is useful to identify preventable perinatal deaths. The pattern of risk identified has implications for improvements in quality of care provided to high-risk cases.","PeriodicalId":430059,"journal":{"name":"National Journal of Community Medicine","volume":"38 1","pages":"0"},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"2023-08-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":"{\"title\":\"Utility of Expert Panel to Identify Preventable Perinatal Deaths: Results from Audit Based Interventional Study in Two Districts of Karnataka State, India\",\"authors\":\"Harsha Kumar H N, Shantaram B. Baliga, P. Kushtagi, N. Kamath, S. Rao\",\"doi\":\"10.55489/njcm.140820233157\",\"DOIUrl\":null,\"url\":null,\"abstract\":\"Background: India has child death review which misses the information from private hospitals and community. Community based perinatal death auditing is required to identify preventable perinatal deaths. The objectives are to know utility of expert panel in an audit-based approach to identify 1). preventable perinatal deaths, 2) Risk factors in cases of perinatal deaths\\nMethodology: Perinatal death auditing was conducted in two districts of Karnataka state. As a part of audit system, an expert panel consisting of paediatricians and obstetricians was formed for each district. The panel met every month and received information about perinatal deaths occurring in the hospitals (government and private) apart from the community in these districts. The panel considered available information about survival chances and care provided to decide if a perinatal death was preventable, possibly preventable or not preventable.\\nResults: Proportion Of identified preventable and possibly preventable perinatal deaths in Koppal District (60%, 20%) was higher than Dakshina Kannada district (34.4%, 30.2%). The proportion preventable intranatal and neonatal risks in Koppal District (79%, 66%) was higher than Dakshina Kannada District (47%, 19%).\\nConclusion: Expert panel is useful to identify preventable perinatal deaths. The pattern of risk identified has implications for improvements in quality of care provided to high-risk cases.\",\"PeriodicalId\":430059,\"journal\":{\"name\":\"National Journal of Community Medicine\",\"volume\":\"38 1\",\"pages\":\"0\"},\"PeriodicalIF\":0.0000,\"publicationDate\":\"2023-08-01\",\"publicationTypes\":\"Journal Article\",\"fieldsOfStudy\":null,\"isOpenAccess\":false,\"openAccessPdf\":\"\",\"citationCount\":\"0\",\"resultStr\":null,\"platform\":\"Semanticscholar\",\"paperid\":null,\"PeriodicalName\":\"National Journal of Community Medicine\",\"FirstCategoryId\":\"1085\",\"ListUrlMain\":\"https://doi.org/10.55489/njcm.140820233157\",\"RegionNum\":0,\"RegionCategory\":null,\"ArticlePicture\":[],\"TitleCN\":null,\"AbstractTextCN\":null,\"PMCID\":null,\"EPubDate\":\"\",\"PubModel\":\"\",\"JCR\":\"\",\"JCRName\":\"\",\"Score\":null,\"Total\":0}","platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"National Journal of Community Medicine","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.55489/njcm.140820233157","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"","JCRName":"","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

摘要

背景:印度的儿童死亡审查缺少来自私立医院和社区的信息。需要以社区为基础的围产期死亡审计,以确定可预防的围产期死亡。目的是了解专家小组在以审计为基础的方法中的作用,以确定1)可预防的围产期死亡,2)围产期死亡病例中的风险因素。方法:围产期死亡审计在卡纳塔克邦的两个地区进行。作为审计系统的一部分,每个地区都成立了一个由儿科医生和产科医生组成的专家小组。小组每月举行一次会议,并收到关于这些地区社区以外的医院(政府和私立)发生的围产期死亡的信息。小组审议了关于生存机会和所提供护理的现有信息,以决定围产期死亡是否可以预防、可能可以预防或不可预防。结果:Koppal区确定的可预防和可能预防的围产期死亡比例(60%、20%)高于Dakshina Kannada区(34.4%、30.2%)。Koppal区可预防的产前和新生儿风险比例(79%,66%)高于Dakshina Kannada区(47%,19%)。结论:专家小组有助于识别可预防的围产期死亡。确定的风险模式对改善向高风险病例提供的护理质量具有影响。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
Utility of Expert Panel to Identify Preventable Perinatal Deaths: Results from Audit Based Interventional Study in Two Districts of Karnataka State, India
Background: India has child death review which misses the information from private hospitals and community. Community based perinatal death auditing is required to identify preventable perinatal deaths. The objectives are to know utility of expert panel in an audit-based approach to identify 1). preventable perinatal deaths, 2) Risk factors in cases of perinatal deaths Methodology: Perinatal death auditing was conducted in two districts of Karnataka state. As a part of audit system, an expert panel consisting of paediatricians and obstetricians was formed for each district. The panel met every month and received information about perinatal deaths occurring in the hospitals (government and private) apart from the community in these districts. The panel considered available information about survival chances and care provided to decide if a perinatal death was preventable, possibly preventable or not preventable. Results: Proportion Of identified preventable and possibly preventable perinatal deaths in Koppal District (60%, 20%) was higher than Dakshina Kannada district (34.4%, 30.2%). The proportion preventable intranatal and neonatal risks in Koppal District (79%, 66%) was higher than Dakshina Kannada District (47%, 19%). Conclusion: Expert panel is useful to identify preventable perinatal deaths. The pattern of risk identified has implications for improvements in quality of care provided to high-risk cases.
求助全文
通过发布文献求助,成功后即可免费获取论文全文。 去求助
来源期刊
自引率
0.00%
发文量
0
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术官方微信