{"title":"论综合(复杂)型法律认识问题","authors":"V. Kozhevnikov","doi":"10.33258/polit.v2i1.594","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"This scientific article analyzes the positions of scientists in relation to the integrative (complex) type of legal understanding. Arguments of its opponents and supporters, advantages, as well as certain interpretations of law from the standpoint of this approach are given. The groundlessness of identifying an integrated approach with a broad understanding of law is emphasized.","PeriodicalId":374904,"journal":{"name":"Polit Journal: Scientific Journal of Politics","volume":"89 1","pages":"0"},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"2022-03-08","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":"{\"title\":\"To the Problem of Integrative (Complex) Type of Understanding Law\",\"authors\":\"V. Kozhevnikov\",\"doi\":\"10.33258/polit.v2i1.594\",\"DOIUrl\":null,\"url\":null,\"abstract\":\"This scientific article analyzes the positions of scientists in relation to the integrative (complex) type of legal understanding. Arguments of its opponents and supporters, advantages, as well as certain interpretations of law from the standpoint of this approach are given. The groundlessness of identifying an integrated approach with a broad understanding of law is emphasized.\",\"PeriodicalId\":374904,\"journal\":{\"name\":\"Polit Journal: Scientific Journal of Politics\",\"volume\":\"89 1\",\"pages\":\"0\"},\"PeriodicalIF\":0.0000,\"publicationDate\":\"2022-03-08\",\"publicationTypes\":\"Journal Article\",\"fieldsOfStudy\":null,\"isOpenAccess\":false,\"openAccessPdf\":\"\",\"citationCount\":\"0\",\"resultStr\":null,\"platform\":\"Semanticscholar\",\"paperid\":null,\"PeriodicalName\":\"Polit Journal: Scientific Journal of Politics\",\"FirstCategoryId\":\"1085\",\"ListUrlMain\":\"https://doi.org/10.33258/polit.v2i1.594\",\"RegionNum\":0,\"RegionCategory\":null,\"ArticlePicture\":[],\"TitleCN\":null,\"AbstractTextCN\":null,\"PMCID\":null,\"EPubDate\":\"\",\"PubModel\":\"\",\"JCR\":\"\",\"JCRName\":\"\",\"Score\":null,\"Total\":0}","platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Polit Journal: Scientific Journal of Politics","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.33258/polit.v2i1.594","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"","JCRName":"","Score":null,"Total":0}
To the Problem of Integrative (Complex) Type of Understanding Law
This scientific article analyzes the positions of scientists in relation to the integrative (complex) type of legal understanding. Arguments of its opponents and supporters, advantages, as well as certain interpretations of law from the standpoint of this approach are given. The groundlessness of identifying an integrated approach with a broad understanding of law is emphasized.
求助内容：
应助结果提醒方式：
京公网安备 11010802042870号
