入侵检测系统的半监督方法综述

Sofy Fitriani, Satria Mandala, M. A. Murti
{"title":"入侵检测系统的半监督方法综述","authors":"Sofy Fitriani, Satria Mandala, M. A. Murti","doi":"10.1109/APMEDIACAST.2016.7878168","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"The increasing number of attacks on computer networks has caused network securities were an important issue since the first network security breaches were discovered in 1980. Currently, the pattern of network attacks becomes more sophisticated and lead to difficulty in detecting the attacks. Failure to prevent the attacks makes privacy, data, and other network resources are threatened. There is numerous network intrusion detection system (NIDS) have been proposed to tackle the network security threats in which the detection methods can be grouped into supervised, unsupervised and semi-supervised. Several artificial intelligence-based methods have also been considered in the NIDS to improve detection accuracies, such as fuzzy, machine learning, support vector machine (SVM) and k-means. Unfortunately, a literature study on semi-supervised intrusion detection system IDS (SS-IDS) is difficult to be found. Indeed, most of IDS literature studies are only focused on supervised and unsupervised detection methods. Consequently, the latest developments and issues on SS-IDS are difficult to be traced quickly. On the other hand, many semi-supervised methods and implementation the methods on IDS have been carried out since 2008. This research conducts a literature study on SS-IDS to tackle the issue by reviewing the developments of SS-IDS from 2008 to 2015. A narrative literature review has been chosen as a method to review the SS-IDS literature. A narrative literature review is a method of scientific publications that addresses specific topics of theoretical viewpoints and contextual. The review results show that the accuracy of the proposed SS-IDS is low. In addition false alarms of the IDS tend to be high.","PeriodicalId":177765,"journal":{"name":"2016 Asia Pacific Conference on Multimedia and Broadcasting (APMediaCast)","volume":"1 1","pages":"0"},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"2016-11-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"17","resultStr":"{\"title\":\"Review of semi-supervised method for Intrusion Detection System\",\"authors\":\"Sofy Fitriani, Satria Mandala, M. A. Murti\",\"doi\":\"10.1109/APMEDIACAST.2016.7878168\",\"DOIUrl\":null,\"url\":null,\"abstract\":\"The increasing number of attacks on computer networks has caused network securities were an important issue since the first network security breaches were discovered in 1980. Currently, the pattern of network attacks becomes more sophisticated and lead to difficulty in detecting the attacks. Failure to prevent the attacks makes privacy, data, and other network resources are threatened. There is numerous network intrusion detection system (NIDS) have been proposed to tackle the network security threats in which the detection methods can be grouped into supervised, unsupervised and semi-supervised. Several artificial intelligence-based methods have also been considered in the NIDS to improve detection accuracies, such as fuzzy, machine learning, support vector machine (SVM) and k-means. Unfortunately, a literature study on semi-supervised intrusion detection system IDS (SS-IDS) is difficult to be found. Indeed, most of IDS literature studies are only focused on supervised and unsupervised detection methods. Consequently, the latest developments and issues on SS-IDS are difficult to be traced quickly. On the other hand, many semi-supervised methods and implementation the methods on IDS have been carried out since 2008. This research conducts a literature study on SS-IDS to tackle the issue by reviewing the developments of SS-IDS from 2008 to 2015. A narrative literature review has been chosen as a method to review the SS-IDS literature. A narrative literature review is a method of scientific publications that addresses specific topics of theoretical viewpoints and contextual. The review results show that the accuracy of the proposed SS-IDS is low. In addition false alarms of the IDS tend to be high.\",\"PeriodicalId\":177765,\"journal\":{\"name\":\"2016 Asia Pacific Conference on Multimedia and Broadcasting (APMediaCast)\",\"volume\":\"1 1\",\"pages\":\"0\"},\"PeriodicalIF\":0.0000,\"publicationDate\":\"2016-11-01\",\"publicationTypes\":\"Journal Article\",\"fieldsOfStudy\":null,\"isOpenAccess\":false,\"openAccessPdf\":\"\",\"citationCount\":\"17\",\"resultStr\":null,\"platform\":\"Semanticscholar\",\"paperid\":null,\"PeriodicalName\":\"2016 Asia Pacific Conference on Multimedia and Broadcasting (APMediaCast)\",\"FirstCategoryId\":\"1085\",\"ListUrlMain\":\"https://doi.org/10.1109/APMEDIACAST.2016.7878168\",\"RegionNum\":0,\"RegionCategory\":null,\"ArticlePicture\":[],\"TitleCN\":null,\"AbstractTextCN\":null,\"PMCID\":null,\"EPubDate\":\"\",\"PubModel\":\"\",\"JCR\":\"\",\"JCRName\":\"\",\"Score\":null,\"Total\":0}","platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"2016 Asia Pacific Conference on Multimedia and Broadcasting (APMediaCast)","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1109/APMEDIACAST.2016.7878168","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"","JCRName":"","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 17

摘要

自1980年首次发现网络安全漏洞以来,越来越多的计算机网络攻击使网络安全成为一个重要问题。目前,网络攻击的模式越来越复杂,导致检测攻击的难度越来越大。如果无法阻止攻击,则隐私、数据和其他网络资源将受到威胁。为了解决网络安全威胁,人们提出了许多网络入侵检测系统(NIDS),其中检测方法可分为监督式、无监督式和半监督式。在NIDS中也考虑了几种基于人工智能的方法来提高检测精度,如模糊、机器学习、支持向量机(SVM)和k-means。然而,关于半监督入侵检测系统(SS-IDS)的研究文献很少。事实上,大多数IDS文献研究只关注监督和非监督检测方法。因此,很难迅速追踪SS-IDS的最新发展和问题。另一方面,自2008年以来,在IDS上开展了许多半监督方法和实施方法。本研究通过回顾2008年至2015年SS-IDS的发展,对SS-IDS进行文献研究,以解决这一问题。本文选择叙事性文献综述的方法对SS-IDS文献进行综述。叙述性文献综述是一种科学出版物的方法,它解决了理论观点和上下文的特定主题。综述结果表明,所提出的SS-IDS精度较低。此外,IDS的误报率往往很高。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
Review of semi-supervised method for Intrusion Detection System
The increasing number of attacks on computer networks has caused network securities were an important issue since the first network security breaches were discovered in 1980. Currently, the pattern of network attacks becomes more sophisticated and lead to difficulty in detecting the attacks. Failure to prevent the attacks makes privacy, data, and other network resources are threatened. There is numerous network intrusion detection system (NIDS) have been proposed to tackle the network security threats in which the detection methods can be grouped into supervised, unsupervised and semi-supervised. Several artificial intelligence-based methods have also been considered in the NIDS to improve detection accuracies, such as fuzzy, machine learning, support vector machine (SVM) and k-means. Unfortunately, a literature study on semi-supervised intrusion detection system IDS (SS-IDS) is difficult to be found. Indeed, most of IDS literature studies are only focused on supervised and unsupervised detection methods. Consequently, the latest developments and issues on SS-IDS are difficult to be traced quickly. On the other hand, many semi-supervised methods and implementation the methods on IDS have been carried out since 2008. This research conducts a literature study on SS-IDS to tackle the issue by reviewing the developments of SS-IDS from 2008 to 2015. A narrative literature review has been chosen as a method to review the SS-IDS literature. A narrative literature review is a method of scientific publications that addresses specific topics of theoretical viewpoints and contextual. The review results show that the accuracy of the proposed SS-IDS is low. In addition false alarms of the IDS tend to be high.
求助全文
通过发布文献求助,成功后即可免费获取论文全文。 去求助
来源期刊
自引率
0.00%
发文量
0
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:604180095
Book学术官方微信